Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:36:27.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nation-state global city tensions in social policy: the case of Mexico City's rising social city-zenship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2020

John Hudson  and
Anahely Medrano
John Hudson*
Affiliation:
Department of Social Policy & Social Work, University of York, York, UK
Anahely Medrano
Affiliation:
El Colegio Mexiquense, Mexico City, Mexico
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Comparative analyses of welfare systems have largely proceeded on the basis that coherent nation-states exist. This assumption was always problematic – as many theorists have acknowledged – but globalisation processes have added a further dimension to this debate, not least because of the increasing power of global cities that act as coordinating hubs for the global economy. Although residing in nation-states, these cities have a special status flowing from their central role in the global economy with often rather different economic, demographic and social contexts. While there is growing literature on global cities, what the rise of these cities means for social policy and for welfare states remains an underexplored issue. Here we outline some key issues the rise of global cities presents for welfare states before proceeding to illustrate both theoretical and practical issues we highlight through a case study of Mexico City.

Keywords

global citieswelfareMexico City
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , February 2013 , pp. 1 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 Taylor & Francis

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamson, P. (1999). The Welfare Modelling Business, Social Policy & Administration, 33(4), 394–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrahamson, P. (2011). The Welfare Modelling Business Revisited: The Case of East Asian Welfare Regimes. In Hwang, G.-J., New Welfare States in East Asia (pp. 15–34). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Babb, S. 2002. Managing Mexico: Economists from nationalism to Neoliberalism, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barba, C. 2004. Los enfoques latinoamericanos sobre la política social: más allá del consenso de Washington. Espiral, 31: 85–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batres, M. (2006). Política social del DF: paradigma para el país. La Jornada, December 28, p. 14.Google Scholar
Beaverstock, J. 1994. Re-thinking skilled international labour migration: World cities and banking organisations. Geoforum, 25: 323–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boltvinik, J. 2004. “Las políticas focalizadas de combate a la pobreza en México. El progresa/oportunidades”. In La pobreza en México y el mundo. Realidades y desafíos, Edited by: Boltvinik, J. and Damián, A.315–347. México: Siglo XX y Gobierno del Estado de Tamaulipas.Google Scholar
Brachet-Márquez, V. 2004. “El estado benefactor mexicano: nacimiento, auge y declive (1822-2002)”. In La pobreza en México y el mundo. Realidades y desafíos, Edited by: Boltvinik, J. and Damián, A.240–272. México: Siglo XX y Gobierno del Estado de Tamaulipas.Google Scholar
Camp, R. A. 2003. Informal and formal networking among Elite Mexican capitalists and politicians. Comparative Sociology, 2: 135–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. L. 2004. Institutional change and globalization, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Canto, M. (2013). La gestión de la política social. In Canto, M. & Martínez, A. (Eds.). Quince años de política social en el Distrito Federal, Balance y propuestas para su fortalecimiento (pp. 143–150). México, D.F.: Consejo de Evaluación del Desarrollo Social del Distrito Federal.Google Scholar
Canto, M. & Martínez, A. (Eds.) (2013). Quince años de política social en el Distrito Federal, Balance y propuestas para su fortalecimiento. México, D.F.: Consejo de Evaluación del Desarrollo Social del Distrito Federal.Google Scholar
Carroll, W. 2007. Global cities in the global corporate network. Environment and Planning A, 39: 2297–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castells, M. 2000. The rise of the network society, 2, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Castells, M. 2010. The rise of the network society, Second Edition with Revised Preface, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Castillo, J. 2008. “After the explosion”. In The endless city, Edited by: Burdett, Ricky and Sudjic, Deyan. 174–185. London: Phaidon.Google Scholar
Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social, CONEVAL. (2011). Pobreza en México y en las entidades federativas 2008-2010. Retrieved September 29, 2011, from http://web.coneval.gob.mx/Informes/Interactivo/Medicion_pobreza_2010.pdfGoogle Scholar
Damián, A. (2003). La pobreza de tiempo. Una revisión metodológica. Estudios Demográficos y urbanos, 18(1), 127–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmerich, G. E. 2010. The state of democracy in Mexico. Norteamérica, 5: 247–285.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The three worlds of welfare capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Graham, S. 1999. Global grids of glass: On global cities, telecommunications, and planetary urban networks. Urban Studies, 36: 929–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, J. 2012. Welfare regimes and global cities: A missing link in the comparative analysis of welfare states?. Journal of Social Policy, 41: 455–473.Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Geografía y Estadística, INEGI. (2011). México en cifras. Información nacional, por entidad federativa y municipios. Retrieved June 24, 2011, from http://www.inegi.org.mx/Google Scholar
Jessop, B. 2000. “From the KWNS to the SWPR”. In Rethinking social policy, Edited by: Lewis, G., Gewirtz, S. and Clarke, J.171–184. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Kazepov, Y. 2010a. “Rescaling social policies towards multilevel governance in Europe: Some reflections on processes at stake and actors involved”. In Rescaling social policies: Towards mutlilevel governance in Europe, Edited by: Kazepov, Y.35–72. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Kazepov, Y. 2010b. Rescaling social policies: Towards mutlilevel governance in Europe, Edited by: Kazepov, Y.Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Lajous-Loaeza, A. (2009). Universal pensions in Mexico City: changing dynamics of citizenship and state formation in a global city (Unpublished MA Thesis). Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Laurell, A. C. 2003. “The transformation of social policy in Mexico”. In Confronting development: Assesing Mexico's economic and political challenges, Edited by: Middlebrook, K. J. and Zepeda, E.320–349. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press and Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
López-Arellano, O. and Blanco Gil, J. 2008. Caminos divergentes para la protección social en salud en México. Salud colectiva, 4: 319–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez, D. (2010). Notas distintivas del paradigma de política social del DF. Ejes problemáticos para un análisis comparativo en los mesogobiernos.Google Scholar
Marván Laborde, I. 2001. La cuestión del gobierno representativo en el Distrito Federal Mexicano. Cuestiones Constitucionales, 4: 49–83.Google Scholar
Medrano-Buenrostro, A. 2011. Change and social policy in Mexico: Insights from ideational institutionalism. Economía Informa, 369: 41–62.Google Scholar
OECD. (2012). OECD Factbook 2011–2012: Economic, Environmental and Social Statistics. OECD: Paris. doi: 10.1787/factbook-2011-enGoogle Scholar
Ramírez, B. (2007). Una visión crítica de la Seguridad Social en México: En dónde estamos y hacia dónde vamos. In LX Legislatura de la Cámara de Diputados del Congreso de la Unión. Taller de Actualización en Seguridad Social. México. Retrieved from http://www.humanindex.unam.mx/humanindex/fichas_pdf/detalle_capitulo.php?id=12330Google Scholar
Sassen, S. 1991. The global city: New York, London, Tokyo, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sassen, S. 1998. Global financial centers. Financial Affairs, 78: 75–87.Google Scholar
Sassen, S. 2001. The global city: New York, London, Tokyo, 2, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sassen, S. 2005. The global city: Introducing a concept. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 11: 27–43.Google Scholar
Schneider, B. R. 2002. Why is Mexican business so organized?. Latin American Research Review, 37: 77–118.Google Scholar
Smith, D. and Timberlake, M. 2001. World city networks and hierarchies, 1977–1997: An empirical analysis of global air travel links. American Behavioral Scientist, 44: 1656–1678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surel, Y. 2000. The role of cognitive and normative frames in policy-making. Journal of European Public Policy, 7: 495–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, P. 2005. Leading world cities: Empirical evaluations of urban nodes in multiple networks. Urban Studies, 42: 1593–1608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thacker, S. C. 1999. NAFTA coalitions and the political viability of neoliberalism in Mexico. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 41: 57–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valencia Lomelí, E. 2010. Los debates sobre los regímenes de bienestar en América Latina y el Este del Asia. Los casos de México y Corea del Sur. Espiral, 16: 65–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, R. and Knapp, B v d. 2011. Sectoral differentiation and network structure within contemporary worldwide corporate networks. Economic Geography, 87: 267–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. H. (2006). Decentralization and Intergovernmental Relations In Social Policy: A Comparative Perspective of Brazil, Mexico and the US. Paper presented at the Interregional Conference on Social Policy and Welfare Reform University of Texas at Austin April 20-21, 2006.Google Scholar
Yeates, N. 2008. “The idea of global social policy”. In Understanding global social policy, Edited by: Yeates, N.1–24. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar