Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:04:35.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Federalism and the politics of the Canada and Quebec Pension Plans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2020

Daniel Béland  and
R. Kent Weaver
Daniel Béland*
Affiliation:
Johnson-Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy, Saskatoon, Canada
R. Kent Weaver
Affiliation:
Johnson-Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy, Saskatoon, Canada
*
CONTACT Daniel Béland [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Drawing on the literature on federalism and public policy, the present article explores the recent politics of two highly-similar and closely integrated Canadian public pension programs created in the mid-1960s: the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) and the Quebec Pension Plan (QPP). This article argues that the parallel evolution of CPP/QPP can be understood by examining how the unique jurisdictional arrangements for the CPP/QPP interacted with other factors to generate by these linked programs have led to the emergence of specific federalism policy dynamics, while muting or foreclosing other potential policy dynamics. As shown, governments have engaged in a process of ‘collusive benchmarking’ that has limited the scope of the available policy options. Differing demographic trends in Quebec and the ‘Rest of Canada’ have strained but also reinforced this policymaking dynamic in recent years. Simultaneously, intergovernmental race to the top dynamics have facilitated the recent push for both CPP and, later, QPP expansion.

Keywords

Federalismpension reformCanada Pension PlanQuebec Pension PlanCanadaQuebec
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy , Volume 35 , Issue 1: SI: Recent Social Policy in Canada and the United States , February 2019 , pp. 25 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberta/British Columbia Joint Expert Panel on Pension Standards. (2008). Getting our acts together: Pension reform in Alberta and British Columbia. Edmonton and Victoria (November). http://www.fin.gov.bc.ca/tbs/tp/JEPPS_Final_Report_Dec1-08.pdfGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, B. (2009). Research study on the Canadian retirement income system. Toronto: Prepared for the Ministry of Finance, Government of Ontario. http://www.fin.gov.on.ca/en/consultations/pension/dec09report.pdfGoogle Scholar
Banting, K. (2005). Canada: Nation-Building in a Federal Welfare State. In Obinger, H., Leibfried, S., & Castles, F. G. (Eds.), Federalism and the Welfare State: New World and European Experiences (pp. 89–137). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banting, K. G. (1985). Institutional conservatism: Federalism and pension reform. In Ismael, J. (Ed.), Canadian social welfare policy: Federal and provincial dimensions (pp. 48–74). Kingston: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
Banting, K. G. (1987). The welfare state and Canadian federalism. Montréal: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
Béland, D. (2006). The politics of social learning: Finance, institutions, and pension reform in the United States and Canada. Governance, 19(4), 559–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béland, D. (2010). Reconsidering policy feedback. Administration & Society, 42, 568–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béland, D. (2013). The politics of the Canada pension plan: Private pensions and federal-provincial parallelism. In Stoney, C. & Doern, G. B. (Eds.), How Ottawa spends, 2013-2014. The harper government: Mid-term blues and long-term plans (pp. 76–87). Montréal and Kingston: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
Béland, D., & Lecours, A. (2006). Sub-state nationalism and the welfare state: Québec and Canadian federalism. Nations and Nationalism, 12, 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béland, D., & Myles, J. (2005). Stasis amidst change: Canadian pension reform in an age of retrenchment. In Bonoli, G. & Shinkawa, T. (Eds.), Ageing and pension reform around the world (pp. 252–272). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Béland, D., & Myles, J. (2012). Varieties of federalism, institutional legacies, and social policy: Comparing old-age and unemployment insurance reform in Canada. International Journal of Social Welfare, 21(S1), S75–S87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boychuk, G. W., & Banting, K. G. (2008). The Canada paradox: The public-private divide in health insurance and pensions. In Béland, D. & Gran, B. (Eds.), Public and private social policy: Health and pension policies in a new era (pp. 92–122). Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryden, K. A. (1974). Old Age pensions and policy-making in Canada. Kingston: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
Canadian Press. (2016, December 18). Un retraité du Québec aura moins qu'un retraité de l'Alberta, se plaint la FTQ. Radio-Canada. Retrieved from http://beta.radio-canada.ca/nouvelle/1006644/retraite-quebec-retraite-reforme-contestation-ftq-csn-csq-finance-carlos-leitaoGoogle Scholar
Canadian Press. (2016, July 7). Manitoba jumps aboard Canada Pension Plan reform: Morneau, Maclean's. Retrieved from http://www.macleans.ca/news/canada/manitoba-jumps-aboard-canada-pension-plan-reform-morneau/Google Scholar
Cloutier-Villeneuve, L. (2015). Les régimes de pension agréés au Québec: Importance, caractéristiques et évolution. Québec City: Institut de la statistique du Québec. Retrieved from http://www.stat.gouv.qc.ca/statistiques/travail-remuneration/avantages-sociaux/rpa.pdfGoogle Scholar
Csanady, A. (2015, August 11). Harper not the only one eager to criticize Wynne and Ontario's pension plan as a ‘payroll tax hike’, National Post.Google Scholar
Department of Finance. (2016). Backgrounder: Canada pension plan (CPP) enhancement. Ottawa: Author. Retrieved from http://www.fin.gc.ca/n16/data/16-113_3-eng.aspGoogle Scholar
Drolet, M. & Morissette, R. (2014, December 18). New facts on pension coverage in Canada. Ottawa: Statistics Canada. Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/75-006-x/2014001/article/14120-eng.pdfGoogle Scholar
Federal/Provincial/Territorial CPP Consultations Secretariat. (1996). An information paper for consultations on the Canada pension plan. Ottawa: the Federal, Provincial and Territorial governments of Canada.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. S. (2004). Privatizing risk without privatizing the welfare state: The hidden politics of social policy retrenchment in the United States. American Political Science Review, 98(2), 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, K. (2006). Provincial interdependence: Concepts and theories. In Harrison, K. (Ed.), Racing to the bottom? Provincial interdependence in the Canadian federation (pp. 1–24). Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Immergut, E. M. (1992). Health politics: Interests and institutions in Western Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, A. M. (2011). Governing for the long term: Democracy and the politics of investment. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, A. M., & Weaver, R. K. (2015). When policies undo themselves: Self-undermining feedback as a source of policy change. Governance, 28, 441–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, B. (2008). Fixing the future: How Canada's usually fractious governments worked together to rescue the Canada pension plan. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marier, P. (Ed.). (2012). Le vieillissement de la population et les politiques publiques: Enjeux d'ici et d'ailleurs. Québec City: Presse de L'Université Laval.Google Scholar
Montgomery, A. (2017, November 2). Quebecers to pay more, get more from QPP, starting in 2019, CBC News. Retrieved from http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/pension-plan-enhancement-quebec-province-1.4384699Google Scholar
Myles, J. (2013). Income Security for Seniors: System Maintenance and Policy Drift. In Banting, K. & Myles, J. (Eds.), Inequality and the Fading of Redistributive Politics (pp. 312–334). Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Obinger, H., Castles, F. G., & Leibfried, S. (2005). Introduction: Federalism and the welfare state. In Obinger, H., Castles, F. G., & Leibfried, S. (Eds.), Federalism and the welfare state (pp. 1–4). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perreaux, L. (2014, July 10). Premier Couillard under fire for Quebec budget's austerity measures. Globe and Mail. Retrieved from https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/couillard-under-fire-for-tight-quebec-budget/article19687590/Google Scholar
Prince, M. J. (2012). A hobbesian prime minister and the night watchman state: Social policy under the Harper conservatives. In Doern, G. B. & Stoney, C. (Eds.), How Ottawa spends, 2012-2013: The Harper majority, budget cuts, and the new opposition (pp. 53–70). Montréal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Prince, M. J. (2013). Blue rinse: Harper's treatment of Old Age security and other elderly benefits. In Doern, G. B. & Stoney, C. (Eds.), How Ottawa spends, 2013-2014. The harper government: Mid-term blues and long-term plans (pp. 64–75). Montréal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Quebec. (2016). Consolider le régime pour renforcer l’équité intergénérationnelle: Document de consultation. Quebec City: Government of Quebec.Google Scholar
Québec, R. (2016). Observations on retirement in quebec: Support document. Québec City: Government of Québec. Retrieved from http://nationalpost.com/news/politics/harper-not-the-only-one-eager-to-criticize-wynne-and-ontarios-pension-plan-as-a-payroll-tax-hikeGoogle Scholar
Régie des rentes du Québec. (1996). For you and your children: Guaranteeing the future of the Quebec pension plan. Québec City: Government of Quebec.Google Scholar
Salvet, J.-M. (2017, May 9). Québec arrime ses pensions avec Ottawa. Le Soleil. Retrieved from http://www.lapresse.ca/le-soleil/actualites/politique/201705/09/01-5096415-quebec-arrime-ses-pensions-avec-ottawa.phpGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, F. (1988). The joint-decision trap: Lessons from west German federalism and European integration. Public Administration, 66, 239–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, F. W. (2006). The joint-decision trap revisited. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 44, 845–864.Google Scholar
Simeon, R. (1972). Federal-provincial diplomacy: The making of recent policy in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Taber, J. (2016, June 21). Keeping ORPP going while awaiting CPP news was ‘worth the cost,’ Wynne says. Globe and Mail.Google Scholar
Tamagno, E. (2008). A tale of two pension plans: The differing fortunes of the Canada and Quebec pension plans. Ottawa: Caledon Institute of Social Policy. Retrieved from http://www.caledoninst.org/Publications/PDF/667ENG.pdfGoogle Scholar
Weaver, R. K. (2004a). Whose money Is It anyway? Governance and social investment in collective 6 investment funds. In Rein, M. & Schmähl, W. (Eds.), Rethinking the welfare state: The political economy of pension reform (pp. 294–316). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Weaver, R. K. (2004b). Pension reform in Canada: Lessons for the United States. Ohio State Law Journal, 65(1), 45–74.Google Scholar
Weaver, R. K. (2010). Paths and forks or chutes and ladders? Negative feedbacks and policy regime change. Journal of Public Policy, 30(2), 137–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, R. K. (Forthcoming). Federalism and the welfare state in Canada and the United States. In Goodyear-Grant, E., Johnston, R., Kymlicka, W., & Myles, J. (Eds.), Federalism and the welfare state in a multicultural world. Montréal: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar