Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:01:30.998Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using defamilisation typologies to study the Confucian welfare regime

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2020

Sam Yu ,
C.M. Chau  and
K.M. Lee
Sam Yu*
Affiliation:
Department of Social Work, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong
C.M. Chau
Affiliation:
Independent Researcher
K.M. Lee
Affiliation:
Division of Social Sciences, Community College of City University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since Esping-Andersen classified the 18 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries into the “three worlds of welfare capitalism” in 1990, the comparative studies of welfare have been dominated by the responses to this study. This paper focuses on two of these responses. The first response is concerned with the gender insensitivity of Esping-Andersen's way of categorizing the welfare regimes. The second response is concerned with the issue that the East Asian countries are under-represented in the 18 OECD countries. To make contributions to these responses, two analytical tasks are conducted. First, we build new defamilisation typologies covering both East Asian countries and OECD countries. Second, we demonstrate that the evidence generated from the typologies suggest that some of the indispensable conditions for the development of a Confucian welfare regime do not exist.

Keywords

East Asiadefamilisation typologiesConfucian ideas
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , February 2015 , pp. 74 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 Taylor & Francis

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamson, P. (2011). The welfare modelling business revisited: The case of East Asian welfare regimes. In Hwang, G-J. (Ed.), New welfare States in East Asia: Global challenges and restructuring (pp. 15–34). UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Aspalter, C. (2006). The East Asian welfare model. International Journal of Social Welfare, 15, 290–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bambra, C. (2004). The worlds of welfare: Illusory and gender blind? Social Policy and Society, 3(3), 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bambra, C. (2007). Defamilisation and welfare state regimes: A cluster analysis. International Journal of Social Welfare, 16, 326–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, R. J., & Lee, J. W. (2013). Educational attainment dataset. Retrieved from http://barrolee.com/Google Scholar
Bonoli, G. (1997). Classifying welfare states: A two-dimension approach. Journal of Social Policy, 26(3), 351–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, S., & Leong, C. W. (1994). Chinese families in transition: Cultural conflicts and adjustment problems. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 3(3), 263–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chau, C. M., & Yu, W. K. (2005). Is welfare unAsian? InWalker, A. & Wong, C. K. (Eds.), East Asian welfare regimes in transition: From Confucianism to globalization (pp. 21–45). Bristol: The Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chau, C. M., & Yu, W. K. (2009). Social quality and the social harmony campaign in Hong Kong. Development and Society, 38(2), 277–295.Google Scholar
Chau, R. C. M., & Yu, S. W. K. (2013). Defamilisation of twenty-two countries: Its implications for the study of East Asian welfare regime. Social Policy and Society, 12(3), 355–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chau, R. C. M., Yu, S. W. K., & Law, C. S. F. (2014). The usefulness of the political economy perspective to the analysis of social welfare in Hong Kong – a case study of the retirement protection measures. Taiwan United Way Review, 3(1), 101–117.Google Scholar
Chiu, W. K., & Wong, K. C. (2009). A literature review of family policy in four East Asian societies. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Council of Labour Affairs Executive Yuan R.O.C. Taiwan. (2010). Labour standards act chapter 50. Retrieved from http://laws.cla.gov.twGoogle Scholar
Council of Labour Affairs Executive Yuan R.O.C. Taiwan. (2012). International statistics by gender. Retrieved from http://www.cla.gov.twGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. London: Polity.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundation of postindustrial economies. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrera, M. (1996). The ‘southern model’ of welfare. Journal of European Social Policy, 6(1), 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, R., White, G., & Kwon, H-J. (Eds.). (1998). The East Asian welfare model: Welfare orientalism and the state. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gough, I. (2001). Globalization and regional welfare regimes. Global Social Policy, 1, 163–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, I., & Wilding, P. (2003). Welfare capitalism in East Asia: Social policy in the tiger economies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ito, K. (2014). Emerging culture wars: Backlash against ‘gender freedom’ (Jenda Furi in Japanese). In Sung, S. & Pascall, G. (Eds.), Gender and welfare State in East Asia: Confucianism or gender equality? (pp. 137–151). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, X. (2009). Confucianism, women and social contexts. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 36(2), 228–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. (Ed.). (1993). New perspectives in the welfare state in Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Karim, S. A., Eikemo, T. A., & Bambra, C. (2010). Welfare state regimes and population health: Integrating the east asian welfare states. Health Policy, 94(1), 45–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, Y. M. (2006). Towards a comprehensive welfare state in South Korea: Institutional features, new social and political pressures, and the possibility of the welfare state. Working Paper No. 14. London: Asia Research Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
Kim, Y. M. (2008). Beyond East Asian welfare productivism in South Korea. Policy and Politics, 36(1), 109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, W. (2000). Faces of inequality: Gender, class and patterns of inequalities in different types of welfare states. Social Politics, 7(2), 127–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, W. (2010). Class and gender inequalities in different types of welfare states: The social citizenship indicator program. International Journal of Social Welfare, 19(S1), S14–S24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovacs, R. (2013). Developmental states and gender-equity: Is the achievement of gender-equity compatible with the logic of the developmental state? E-International Relations. Retrieved from http://www.e-ir.info/2013/04/13/developmental-states-and-gender-equity/Google Scholar
Kroger, T. (2011). Defamilisation, dedomestication and care policy: Comparing childcare service provisions of welfare states. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 31(7/8), 424–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ku, Y. W., & Jones Finer, C. (2007). Developments in East Asian welfare studies. Social Policy & Administration, 41(2), 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, H-J. (2005). An overview of the study: The developmental welfare state and policy reforms in East Asia. In Kwon, H-J. (Ed.), Transforming the developmental welfare state in East Asia (pp. 1–26). New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, M. L., & Kwok, H. L. (2008). Older women and family care in Hong Kong: Differences in filial expectation and practices. Journal of Women and Aging, 17(1–2), 129–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y-J., & Ku, Y-W. (2007). East Asian welfare regimes: Testing the hypothesis of the developmental welfare state. Social Policy and Administration, 41(2), 197–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitner, S. (2003). Varieties of familialism: The caring function of the family in comparative perspective. European Societies, 5(4), 353–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitner, S. (2005). Conservative familialism reconsidered: The case of Belgium. Acta Politica, 40, 419–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, L. C. (2014). Gender mainstreaming childcare policy: Barriers in a Confucian welfare society. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 30(1), 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, L. C., & Chan, K. W. (2012). A family-friendly policy for Hong Kong: Lessons from three international experiences. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 32(1/2), 82–95.Google Scholar
Lister, R. (1994). ‘She has other duties’: Women, citizenship and social security. In Baldwin, S. & Falkingham, J. (Eds.), Social security and social change: New challenges to the Beveridge model (pp. 31–44). New York; London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Lister, R. (1997). Citizenship: Feminist perspectives. Washington Square, NY: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, E., & Glendinning, C. (1994). Paying for care in Europe: Is there a feminist approach? InHantrais, L. & Mangen, S. (Eds.), Family policy and the welfare of women (pp. 52–59). Loughborough: University of Loughborough.Google Scholar
Michon, P. (2008). Familisation and defamilisation policy in 22 European countries. Poznan University of Economics Review, 8(1), 34–54.Google Scholar
National Statistics, R.O.C. Taiwan. (2013). Main statistical indicators by gender, Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics Executive Yuan. Retrieved from http://eng.stat.gov.twGoogle Scholar
Nyberg, A. (2002). Gender, (De)commodification, economic (In)dependence and autonomous households: The case of Sweden. Critical Social Policy, 22(1), 72–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochiai, E., & Johshita, K. (2014). Prime ministers' discourse in Japan's reforms since the 1980s: Traditionalization of modernity rather than Confucianism. In Sung, S. & Pascall, G. (Eds.), Gender and welfare state in East Asia: Confucianism or gender equality? (pp. 152–180). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD. (2012). OECD family database. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/social/soc/oecdfamilydatabase.htmGoogle Scholar
OECD. (2014). OECD employment database. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/els/emp/onlineoecdemploymentdatabase.htmGoogle Scholar
Orloff, A. (1993). Gender and the social rights of citizenship: The comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states. American Sociological Review, 58(3), 303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, M., & Barrientos, A. (2004). Welfare regimes and the welfare mix. European Journal of Political Research, 43(1), 83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rieger, E., & Liebfried, S. (2003). Limits to globalization: Welfare states and the world economy (translation by B. W. Veghte with the assistance of E. Rieger). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Sainsbury, D. (1999). Gender, policy regimes and politics. In Sainsbury, D. (Ed.), Gender and welfare state regimes (pp. 245–277). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sekiguchi, S. (2010). Confucian morals and the making of a ‘good wife and wise mother’: From ‘between husband and wife there is distinction’ to ‘As husbands and wives be harmonious’. Social Science Japan Journal, 13(1), 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shang, X. Y., Fisher, K. R., & Guo, P. (2014). Gender, social policy and older women with disabilities in rural China. In Sung, S. & Pascall, G. (Eds.), Gender and welfare state in East Asia: Confucianism or gender equality? (pp. 90–113). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sin, L. Y. M., & Yau, O. H. M. (2004). Female role orientation of Chinese women: Conceptualization and scale development. Psychology & Marketing, 21(12), 1033–1058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sung, S. (2003). Women reconciling paid and unpaid work in a Confucian welfare state: The case of South Korea. Social Policy and Administration, 37(4), 342–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sung, S. (2014). Work-family balance issues and policies in Korea: Towards an egalitarian regime? InSung, S. & Pascall, G. (Eds.), Gender and welfare state in East Asia: Confucianism or gender equality? (pp. 29–48). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sung, S., & Pascall, G. (Eds.). (2014). Introduction: Gender and welfare states in East Asia. In Sung, S. & Pascall, G. (Eds.), Gender and welfare state in East Asia: Confucianism or gender equality? (pp. 1–28). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations. (2005). The World's Women 2005: Progress in Statistics. Retrieved from http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/products/indwm/wwpub.htmGoogle Scholar
United Nations. (2010). The World's Women 2010: Trends and Statistics. Retrieved from http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/products/Worldswomen/WW2010pub.htmGoogle Scholar
United Nations. (2012). Statistics and indicators on women and men. Retrieved from http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/Google Scholar
Walker, A., & Wong, C. K. (1996). Rethinking the western construction of the welfare state. International Journal of Health Services, 26(1), 67–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, A., & Wong, C. K. (2004). The ethnocentric construction of the welfare state. In Kennett, P. (Ed.), A handbook of comparative social policy (pp. 116–150). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Walker, A., & Wong, C. K. (2005). Introduction: East Asian welfare regimes. In Walker, A. & Wong, C. K. (Eds.), East Asian welfare regimes in transition (pp. 3–20). Hong Kong: The Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, G., & Goodman, R. (1998). Welfare orientalism and the search for an East Asian welfare model. In Goodman, R., White, G., & Kwon, H-J. (Eds.), The East Asian welfare model: Welfare orientalism and the state (pp. 3–24). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Won, S. Y. (2007). Institutionalised powerlessness? The reality of women's policy units and their gendered dynamics in Korea. Journal of Social Policy, 36(part 2), 270–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, S. Y. (2014). Continuity and change: Comparing work and care reconciliation of Two generations of women in Taiwan. In Sung, S. & Pascall, G. (Eds.), Gender and welfare state in East Asia: Confucianism or gender equality? (pp. 1–28). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Yu, W. K. (2012). The contributions of the health decommodification typologies to the study of the East Asian welfare regime. Social Policy and Administration, 46(1), 108–128.Google Scholar