Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:55:37.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender regimes and gender equality measures in Central Eastern European Countries post-accession: the case of Hungary and Poland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2020

Samantha Velluti
Samantha Velluti*
Affiliation:
School of Law, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, LincolnLN6 7TS, UK
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper is set to examine the state of gender equality in Central Eastern European Countries (CEECs) since accession to the European Union (EU) following the two enlargements in 2004 and 2007, which saw 10 CEECs join the EU. In this context, the paper addresses some implications of transformation, which challenge gender regimes across CEECs. The paper looks at the nature of the policies adopted to ensure gender equality in Central Eastern Europe (CEE) and, in particular, using Hungary's and Poland's family policies as a case study, it evaluates whether EU gender equality measures have had an impact on gender equality and justice in CEE and, more generally, whether they have led to new gender equality paradigms.

Keywords

gender equalitygender mainstreaminggender equality paradigmsCentral Eastern EuropeHungaryPoland
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy , Volume 30 , Issue 1: Gender justice and global policy paradigms , February 2014 , pp. 79 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Taylor & Francis

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, K. (2013). The Lisbon Strategy and Europe 2020: From the governance of coordination to the coordination of governance. In Papadimitriou, D. & Copeland, P. (Eds.), The EU's Lisbon Strategy. Evaluating success, understanding failure (pp. 208–228). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Beveridge, F. (2007). Building against the past: The impact of mainstreaming on EU gender law and policy. European Law Review, 32, 193–212.Google Scholar
Beveridge, F., & Nott, S. (2002). Mainstreaming: A case for optimism and cynicism. Feminist Legal Studies, 10(3), 299–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beveridge, F., & Velluti, S. (2008). Introduction. In Beveridge, F. & Velluti, S. (Eds.), Gender and the open method of coordination. Perspectives on law, governance and equality in the EU (pp. 1–9). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Cerami, A. (2008). Central Europe in transition: Emerging models of welfare and social assistance. MPRA Paper 8377. Retrieved from http://www.mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/8377/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Council of the European Union. (1986). Council Directive 86/378/EEC of 24 July 1986 on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in occupational social security schemes OJ [1986] L 225/40 as amended by Directive 96/97/EC OJ [1997] L 46/20.Google Scholar
Council of the European Union. (2011). Council conclusions on the European pact for gender equality for the period 2011–2020, 3073th employment, social policy, health and consumer affairs council meeting Brussels, 7 March 2011. Retrieved from http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/lsa/119628.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ellis, E. (2010). The impact of the Lisbon Treaty on gender equality. European Gender Equality Law Review, 1, 7–13.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1996). Welfare states in transition. Social security in the new global economy. London: Sage.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2010a). Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. COM(2010) 2020 final.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2010b). Enhancing economic policy coordination for stability, growth and jobs – Tools for stronger EU economic governance. COM(2010) 367 final.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2010c). Europe 2020: Integrated guidelines for the economic and employment policies of the member states. COM(2010) 488 final.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2010d). Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the regions of 21 September 2010 – strategy for equality between women and men 2010–2015. COM(2010) 491 final.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2011a). Communication from the Commission, Annual Growth Survey 2012. COM(2011) 815 final, Vol. 1/5.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2011b). Annex, progress report on the Europe 2020 strategy to the communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the regions, Annual Growth Survey 2012. COM(2011) 815 final, Vol. 2/5 Annex 1.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2011c). Concluding the first semester of economic policy coordination: Guidance for national policies in 2011–2012. COM(2011) 400 final.Google Scholar
European Parliament. (2012). Directorate-General for internal policies, policy department C – Citizens’ rights and constitutional affairs, FEMM, gender equality, analysis of five national reform programmes 2012 regarding the pursuit of the union's gender equality objectives – Study. PE 462.510, 2012.Google Scholar
European Parliament and Council of the European Union. (2003). Directive 2003/41/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 June 2003 on the activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision. O.J. 2003, L235/10.Google Scholar
European Parliament and Council of the European Union. (2006). Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (recast). OJ [2006] L204/23.Google Scholar
European Women's Lobby. (2000). EWL position on the charter of fundamental rights of the EU. 21/11/2000. Retrieved from www.womenlobby.org/Document.asp?DocID+208&tod+17211Google Scholar
Fenger, H. (2007). Welfare regimes in Central and Eastern Europe: Incorporating post-communist countries in a welfare regime typology. Contemporary Issues and Ideas in Social Sciences, 3(2), 1–30.Google Scholar
Fredman, S. (2006). Transformation or dilution: Fundamental rights in the EU social space. European Law Journal, 12(1), 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glass, C., & Fodor, E. (2007). From public to private maternalism? Gender and welfare in Poland and Hungary after 1989. Social Politics, 14(3), 323–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González, E., & Sansonetti, S. (2012). Data for the evaluation of the European semester process from a gender equality perspective. Report for the European Parliament's Committee on Gender Equality. Directorate-General for Internal Policies, Policy Department C – Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs.Google Scholar
Guerrina, R. (2003). Gender, mainstreaming and the EU charter of fundamental rights. Policy and Society, 22(1), 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, B., & Fahlén, S., Takács, J. (2011). Agency and capabilities to achieve a work–life balance: A comparison of Sweden and Hungary. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 18(2), 168–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koldinská, K. (2011). Case law of the European court of justice on sex discrimination. Common Market Law Review, 48, 1599–1638.Google Scholar
Kollonay Lehoczky, C. (2005). The significance of existing EU sex equality law for women in the new member states. The case of Hungaryj. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 12(4), 467–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koukoulis-Spiliotopoulos, S. (2008). The Lisbon Treaty and the charter of fundamental rights: Maintaining and developing the acquis in gender equality. European Gender Equality Law Review, 1, 15–24.Google Scholar
Lombardo, E., & Meier, P. (2007). European Union gender policy since Beijing: Shifting concepts and agendas. In Verloo, M. (Ed.), Multiple meanings of gender equality: A critical frame analysis of gender politics in Europe (pp. 51–75). Budapest: CPS Books.Google Scholar
Marlier, E., & Natali, D. (Eds.), with Van Dam, R. (2010). Europe 2020. Towards a More Social EU? Brussels: PIE, Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Naldini, M., & Saraceno, C. (2008). Social and family policies in Italy: Not totally frozen but far from structural reforms. Social Policy and Administration, 42(7), 733–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pascall, G., & Lewis, J. (2004). Emerging gender regimes and policies for gender equality in wider Europe. Journal of Social Policy, 33(3), 373–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Praesidium of the Convention. (2007). Explanations relating to the charter of fundamental rights. (2007/C303/02) OJ [2007] C 303/17.Google Scholar
Rees, T. (1998). Mainstreaming equality in the European Union, education, training and labour market policies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rubery, J. (2002). Gender equality and gender mainstreaming in the EU: The impact of the EU employment strategy. Industrial Relations Journal, 33, 500–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubery, J. (2005). Gender mainstreaming and the OMC: Is the open method too open for gender equality policy? InZeitlin, J. & Pochet, P. (Eds.), The open method of coordination in action (pp. 391–416). Brussels: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Rubery, J., & Fagan, C. (2000). Gender impact assessment and European employment strategy. Manchester: EWERC.Google Scholar
Rubery, J., Grimshaw, D., Fagan, C., Figueiredo, H., & Smith, M. (2003). Gender equality still on the European Agenda – but for how long? Industrial Relations Journal, 34(5), 477–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schütze, R. (2011). Three “bills of rights” for the European Union. Yearbook of European Law, 30(1), 131–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloat, A. (2004). Legislating for equality: The implementation of the EU equality acquis in central and Eastern Europe. Jean Monnet WP 08/04.Google Scholar
Squires, J. (2005). Is mainstreaming transformative? Theorizing mainstreaming in the context of diversity and deliberation. Social Politics, 12(3), 344–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szelewa, D. (2012). Childcare policies and gender relations in Eastern Europe: Hungary and Poland compared. Harriet Taylor Mill-Institut für Ökonomie und Geschlechterforschung Discussion Paper 17, 03/2012. Retrieved from www.harriet-taylor-mill.deGoogle Scholar
Szelewa, D., & Polakowski, M. P. (2008). Who cares? Changing patterns of childcare in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 18(2), 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. (2010a). National mechanisms for gender equality in South-East and Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia, regional study on strengthening national mechanisms for gender equality and the empowerment of women, United Nations. Retrieved from www.unece.org/index.php?id=1474Google Scholar
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. (2010b). National mechanisms for gender equality in EU member states and candidate countries and other developed economies of the UNECE region: Regional study. Retrieved from www.unece.org/index.php?id=1475Google Scholar
Velluti, S. (2004). The European employment strategy and the challenges of enlargement. In Tridimas, T. & Nebbia, P. (Eds.), European Union law for the twenty-first century – rethinking the new legal order (pp. 415–436). Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Velluti, S. (2005). Implementing gender equality and mainstreaming in an enlarged European Union – some thoughts on prospects and challenges for Central Eastern Europe. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 27(2), 221–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velluti, S. (2010). New governance and the European employment strategy. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velluti, S. (2013). Employment and the Lisbon Strategy. In Papadimitriou, D. & Copeland, P. (Eds.), The EU's Lisbon Strategy. Evaluating success, understanding failure (pp. 88–110). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Verloo, M. (2005). Displacement and empowerment: Reflections on the concept and practice of the council of Europe approach to gender mainstreaming and gender equality. Social Politics, 12(3), 344–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villa, P., & Smith, M. (2009). The national reform programme 2008 and the gender aspects of the European employment strategy. The coordinators’ synthesis report prepared for the equality unit, European Commission, final report. EU Expert Group on Gender and Employment (EGGE), The National Experts. Retrieved March, 2009, from www.fondazionebrodolini.itGoogle Scholar
Villa, P., & Smith, M. (2010). Gender equality, employment policies and the crisis in EU member states. Synthesis report 2009, EU Expert Group on Gender and Employment (EGGE), The National Experts. Retrieved March, 2010, from www.fondazionebrodolini.itGoogle Scholar
Walby, S. (2005). Gender mainstreaming: Productive tensions in theory and practice. Social Politics, 12(3), 321–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar