Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-10T07:45:11.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Convergence from below? The reform of minimum income protection in France and the UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2020

Daniel Clegg
Daniel Clegg*
Affiliation:
School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, 15a George Square, EdinburghEH8 9LD, UK
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Through a systematic comparison of major reforms to minimum income benefits for people of working age in France and the UK, this paper assesses the scope for cross-national convergence in this growing sector of European welfare states. It shows that while differing institutional legacies have shaped the precise design of the new minimum income systems that have been put in place on each side of the Channel in recent years, there is also evidence of an increasingly common conceptualisation of the function of the last safety net and its articulation with the labour market, despite the two countries' still very different political economies. This suggests the potential across welfare states for convergence “from below” on broader understandings of the role of social security provisions in regulating economic life.

Keywords

minimum incomeFranceUKsimplificationactivationmake work payconvergence
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , June 2014 , pp. 147 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Taylor & Francis

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allègre, G. (2011). Le RSA: redistribution vers les travailleurs pauvres et offre de travail. Revue de l'OFCE, 3(118), 33–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assemblée Nationale. (2008). Journal Officiel de la République Française, 2e Session Extraordinaire 2007–2008, Compte Rendu Intégral, 2e séance de jeudi 25 septembre 2008, Paris: Journaux Officiels.Google Scholar
Bahle, T., Hubl, V., & Pfeifer, M. (2011). The last safety net: A handbook of minimum income protection in Europe. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Bonoli, G. (2012). Blame avoidance and credit claiming revisited. In Bonoli, G. & Natali, D. (Eds.), The politics of the new welfare state (pp. 93–110). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, M., Browne, J., & Jinn, W. (2011). Universal credit: A preliminary analysis. IFS Briefing Note 116. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.Google Scholar
Brewer, M., Clark, T., & Myck, M. (2001). Credit where it’s due? An assessment of the new tax credits. IFS Commentary no. 86. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahuc, P., & Zylberberg, A. (2009). Les réformes ratées du président Sarkozy. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Caune, H., Jacquot, S., & Palier, B. (2011). Boasting the national model: The EU and welfare reforms in France. In Graziano, P., Jacquot, S., & Palier, B. (Eds.), The EU and the domestic politics of welfare state reforms: Europa, Europae (pp. 48–72). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centre for Social Justice. (2009). Dynamic benefits: Towards welfare that works. London: Centre for Social Justice.Google Scholar
CERC. (2004). Les enfants pauvres en France (Rapport du CERC no. 4). Paris: La documentation Française.Google Scholar
Clasen, J. (2011). The United Kingdom: Towards a single working-age benefit system. In Clasen, J. & Clegg, D. (Eds.), Regulating the risk of unemployment: National adaptations to post-industrial labour markets in Europe (pp. 15–33). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clegg, D., & Palier, B. (forthcoming). Implementing a myth: The evolution of conditionality in French minimum income protection. In Lødemel, I. & Moreira, A. (Eds.), Activation or workfare? Governance and neo-liberal convergence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cm 6730. (2006). A new deal for welfare: Empowering people to work. London: Department for Work and Pensions.Google Scholar
Cm 7913. (2010). 21st century welfare. London: Department for Work and Pensions.Google Scholar
Cm 7971. (2010). Consultation responses to 21st century welfare. London: Department for Work and Pensions.Google Scholar
Cm 7957. (2010). Universal credit: Welfare that works. London: Department for Work and Pensions.Google Scholar
Colomb, F. (2012). Le succès des incitations: Construction d'une nouvelle orientation des politiques de l'emploi en France. Gouvernement et action publique, 3/2012, 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Concialidi, P. (2009). Controversy over new return-to-work measure. EIROonline, FR0811029I. Retrieved February 24, 2014, from http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/eiro/2008/11/articles/fr0811029i.htmGoogle Scholar
Connell, A. (2011). Welfare policy under New Labour: The politics of social security reform. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
Conseil d'Orientation pour l'Emploi. (2008). Avis du COE sur les conditions de la réussite du RSA pour l'emploi. Paris: Conseil d'Orientation pour l'Emploi.Google Scholar
Cour des Comptes. (2006). L'efficacité et gestion de la prime pour l'emploi. Rapport Public Annuel 2006. Paris: Cour des Comptes, 283–307.Google Scholar
Daguerre, A. (2007). Active labour market policies and welfare reform: Europe and the US in comparative perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damon, J. (2005). Le rapport ‘Hisrch’: filiation, contenu et enjeux. Revue de Droit Sanitaire et Social, 4, 610–619.Google Scholar
DREES. (2012). Définitions et barèmes relatifs aux minimas sociaux, Ministère des affaires sociales et de la santé, published 24th February 2012. Retrieved May 15, 2014, from http://www.drees.sante.gouv.fr/definitions-et-baremes-relatifs-aux-minimas-sociaux,10483.htmlGoogle Scholar
Department for Work and Pensions. (2013). Universal credit works for employers. London: DWP.Google Scholar
Emmanuelli, H. (2001, February 19). Non au libéralisme new look. In Fondation Jean Jaurès (Ed.), Plein emploi: Les orientations du rapport de Jean Pisani-Ferry (pp. 61–70). Paris: Notes de la fondation Jean Jaurès.Google Scholar
Erhel, C., & Zajdela, H. (2004). The dynamics of social and labour market policies in France and the United Kingdom: Between path dependence and convergence. Journal of European Social Policy, 14(2), 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Eydoux, A., & Tuchszirer, C. (2011). Du RMI au RSA: La difficile mise en place d'une gouvernance décentralisée des politiques d'insertion. La Revue Française des Affaires Sociales, 4, 90–113.Google Scholar
Frazer, H., & Marlier, E. (2009). Minimum income across EU member states: Synthesis report, EU Network of Independent Experts on Social Exclusion, Brussels: European Commission DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities.Google Scholar
Freud, D. (2007). Reducing dependency, increasing opportunity: Options for the future of welfare to work an independent report to the Department for Work and Pensions. London: Department for Work and Pensions.Google Scholar
Goerne, A. (2011). A comparative analysis of in-work poverty in the European Union. In Fraser, N., Gutierrez, R., & Pena-Casas, R. (Eds.), Working poverty in Europe: A comparative approach (pp. 15–45). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griggs, J., Hammond, A., & Walker, R. (forthcoming). Activation for all: Welfare reform in the UK 1995 to 2009. In Lødemel, I. & Moreira, A. (Eds.), Activation or workfare? Governance and neo-liberal convergence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grover, C., & Stewart, J. (2001). The work connection: The role of social security in British economic regulation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Haddon, C. (2012). Making policy in opposition: The development of Universal Credit, 2005–10. London: Institute for Government.Google Scholar
Hall, P., & Soskice, D. (Eds.). (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemerijck, A. (2013). Changing welfare states. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hirsch, M. (2005). “Au possible nous sommes tenus”: rapport de la Commission Familles, vulnérabilité, pauvreté. Paris: La documentation Française.Google Scholar
Hirsch, M. (2008). Livre vert vers un revenu de solidarité active. Paris: La documentation Française.Google Scholar
House of Commons. (2011a). Welfare Reform Bill Committee, 3rd Sitting, 24 March 2011.Google Scholar
House of Commons. (2011b). Welfare Reform Bill Committee, 5th Sitting, 29 March 2011.Google Scholar
House of Commons. (2011c). Hansard, House of Commons Debates, 9 March 2011.Google Scholar
Immervoll, H. (2010). Minimum income benefits in OECD countries: Policy design, effectiveness and challenges. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, 100.Google Scholar
Inland Revenue. (2001). The new tax credits: Supporting families, making work pay and tackling poverty. London: Inland Revenue.Google Scholar
Kahl, S. (2009). Religious doctrines and poor relief: A different causal pathway. In van Kersbergen, K. & Manow, P. (Eds.), Religion, class coalitions and welfare states (pp. 267–296). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafore, R. (2004). La décentralisation du revenu minimum d'insertion. Revue de Droit Sanitaire et Social, 1/2004, 14–29.Google Scholar
Le Duigou, J.-C. (2001, February 19). Une rupture non-accomplie. In Fondation Jean Jaurès (Ed.), Plein emploi: Les orientations du rapport de Jean Pisani-Ferry (pp. 71–86). Paris: Notes de la fondation Jean Jaurès.Google Scholar
Lødemel, I. (1997). The welfare paradox: Income maintenance and the personal social services in Norway and Britain, 1946–1966. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
Marx, I., & Nelson, K. (2013). A new dawn for minimum income protection? InMarx, I. & Nelson, K. (Eds.), Minimum income protection in flux (pp. 1–27). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, S. (2012). Fixing France's broken social model? An assessment of employment and labour market policy under the Sarkozy presidency. French Politics, 10(3), 290–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palier, B. (2005). Gouverner la sécurité sociale (2nd éd.). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, M., & Whittaker, M. (2012). Conditions uncertain: Assessing the impact of Universal Credit in-work conditionality. London: The Resolution Foundation.Google Scholar
Sainsbury, R., & Stanley, K. (2007). One for all: Active welfare and the single working-age benefit. London: IPPR.Google Scholar
Sirugue, C. (2013). Réforme des dispositifs de soutien aux revenus d'activité modestes: Rapport au M. le Premier Ministre, Paris, July 2013.Google Scholar
Trade Union Confederation. (2010). Welfare reform will be undermined by squeeze on middle-income families, TUC press release, 1 October 2010. Retrieved February 24, 2014, from http://www.tuc.org.uk/social-issues/welfare-and-benefits/tax-credits/welfare-reform-will-be-undermined-squeeze-middleGoogle Scholar
Vlandas, T. (2013). The politics of in-work benefits: The case of the ‘active income of solidarity’ in France. French Politics, 11(2), 117–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteside, N. (2014). Constructing unemployment: Britain and France in historical perspective. Social Policy & Administration, 48(1), 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar