Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T13:37:45.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

US-Mexico Free Trade: Implications for the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Sidney Weintraub
Sidney Weintraub*
Affiliation:
Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs, the University of Texas at Austin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Moment of Truth has come for the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The US Congress will have to stop talking and vote to accept or reject the agreement negotiated among Canada, Mexico, and the United States. The disagreement on NAFTA in the United States is about free trade with Mexico, not with Canada. A US-Canada free trade agreement (FTA) already exists.

This controversy over NAFTA has been fierce in the United States, much more so than in Mexico. This comparison speaks volumes about changing attitudes. It was almost unthinkable a decade ago that Mexico would so drastically alter its traditional position of maintaining economic and political distance from the United States. This change would not have been possible but for la decena trágica, the years of the 1980s. Beyond that, Mexico has more at stake in a free trade agreement. It has the smaller economy (about 1/27th that of the United States) so that changes, for better or worse, are magnified.

Type
Two Views of the NAFTA
Information
Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , Summer 1992 , pp. 29 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almon, C., Ruiz-Moncayo, A., and Sangines, L. (1991) “Indus-trial Effects of a Mexico-US Free Trade Agreement.” Paper prepared under contract with the US Department of Labor, at the Center for International Business Education and Research, University of Maryland, College Park (MD).Google Scholar
Faux, J. and Rothstein, R. (1991) “Fast Track, Fast Shuffle: The Economic Consequences of the Administration's Proposed Trade Agreement with Mexico.” Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.Google Scholar
Hufbauer, G., and Schott, J. (1992) North American Free Trade. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics (HE).Google Scholar
Levy, S., and Van Wijnbergen, S. (1992) “Mexican Agriculture in the Free Trade Agreement: Transition Problems in Economic Reform.” Paris, France: OECD Development Centre.Google Scholar
Unger, K. (1991) “Mexican Manufactured Exports and US Transnational Corporations,” pp. 225–254 in Díaz-Briquets, S. and Weintraub, S. (eds.) Migration Impacts of Trade and Foreign Investment: Mexico and Caribbean Basin Countries. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
US Embassy, Mexico (1992) Economic Trends Report, February 1992. Mexico (DF), Mexico: US Embassy.Google Scholar
US International Trade Commission (US-ITC) (1992) Economy-Wide Modeling of the Economic Implications of a FTA with Mexico and a NAFTA with Canada and Mexico (publication 2508). Washington, DC: US-ITC.Google Scholar
US International Trade Commission (US-ITC) (1991) The Likely Impact of a Free Trade Agreement with Mexico (publication 2353). Washington, DC: US-ITC.Google Scholar
Weintraub, S., and Baer, M. (1992) “The Interplay between Economic and Political Opening.” Washington Quarterly 15, 2 (Spring): 187–201.Google Scholar
Womack, J., Jones, D., and Ross, D. (1990) The Machine that Changed the World: The Story of Lean Production. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
(The) World Bank (1991) World Development Report. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar