Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:19:36.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unprecedented Disparities, Unparalled Adjustment Needs: Winners and Losers on the NAFTA 'Fast Track'

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Michael E. Conroy  and
Amy K. Glasmeier
Michael E. Conroy
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Texas, Austin
Amy K. Glasmeier
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

History will record the almost-frenzied pace with which negotiators from Mexico, the United States, and Canada have proceeded to draft a treaty that will change drastically the nature of economic relations among the three nations. Three nations with severe social and economic problems, declining competitiveness in the global economy, and virtually no plans for remedying their domestic shortcomings have rushed to drop their borders. Ironically, this act will further reduce their ability to provide domestic remedies for their current problems. It casts these three economies into the unpredictable winds of free trade precisely at a time when a truly-conservative policy would have dictated economic reform at home and efforts to resolve, first, the major domestic crises in each.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , Winter 1992 , pp. 1 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bachrach, C. and Mizrahi, L. (1992) The Economic Impact of a Free Trade Area Agreement between the United States and Mexico: A CGE Analysis, Addendum Paper #2 in US International Trade Commission (ed.) Economy-Wide Modeling of the Economic Implications of a FTA with Mexico and a NAFTA with Canada and Mexico (USITC públication # 2516, May). Washington, DC: US International Trade Commission.Google Scholar
Bliss, C. (1990) “Adjustment, Compensation, and Factor Mobility in Integrated Markets,” pp. 18–52 in Bliss, Christopher and de Macedo, Jorge Braga (eds.) Unity with Diversity in the European Economy. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Braga, DE Macedo, J. (1990) “External Liberalization with Ambiguous Public Response: The Experience of Portugal,” pp. 310–355 in Bliss, Christopher and de Macedo, Jorge Braga (eds.) Unity with Diversity in the European Economy. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, B. (1992) “Canada under Siege: Three Years into the Free Trade Era” (January). Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.Google Scholar
Cogan, J. (1992) Author telephone interview with Jerry Cogan, President of Milliken Research Corporation, Washington (DC), June.Google Scholar
Collins, D. (1983) The Operations of the European Social Fund. London, England: Croom, Helm Publishers.Google Scholar
Conroy, M. (1993) “The Nero Syndrome: Strategic Imperatives and the North American Free Trade Agreement,” forthcoming in Bagley, Bruce and Aguayo, Sergio (eds.) The United States and Mexico: Economic Growth and Security in a Changing World Order. Miami, FL: North-South Center.Google Scholar
Freeman, N. (1992) Author interview with Naomi Freeman, negotiator, Textile and Apparel Office, US Department of Commerce, Washington (DC), July.Google Scholar
(The) Globe and Mail (Toronto) (1992) “Trend to Foreign-Made Ads a Severe Blow to Canadian Firms.” (6 January): Bl.Google Scholar
(The) Globe and Mail (Toronto) (1991a) “Recession Erodes Support for Canada-US Pact.” (25 November): B-1 and B-12.Google Scholar
(The) Globe and Mail (Toronto) (1991b) “A Coddled Industry Faces Bare Facts.” (26 November): B-l and B-22.Google Scholar
Gomez Fuentes, A. (1986) Así cambiará España: la batalla del mercado común. Madrid, Spain: Plaza y Janes Editores.Google Scholar
Herzenberg, S. (1992) Unpublished staff memo. Washington, DC: US Department of Labor.Google Scholar
Hufbauer, G. and Schott, J. (1992) North American Free Trade: Issues and Recommendations. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics (HE).Google Scholar
Hunter, L., Markusen, J. and Rutherford, T. (1992) “Trade Liberalization in a Multinational-Dominated Industry: A Theoretical and Applied General Equilibrium Analysis,” Addendum Paper #5 in US International Trade Commission (ed.) Economy-Wide Modeling of the Economic Implications of a FTA with Mexico and a NAFTA with Canada and Mexico (USITC públication 2516, May). Washington, DC: US International Trade Commission.Google Scholar
Levy, S. and Van Wijnbergen, S. (1992) “ Transition Problems in Economic Reform: Agriculture in the Mexico-US Free Trade Agreement,” Addendum Paper #1 in US International Trade Commission (ed.) Economy-Wide Modeling of the Economic Implications of a FTA with Mexico and a NAFTA with Canada and Mexico (USITC públication 2516, May). Washington, DC: US International Trade Commission.Google Scholar
Lucas, R. (1992) Autlior interview with Ron Lucas, Manager of branch plant for Levi's, Warsaw (VA), July.Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, J. (1992) Author telephone interview with Judah Mandelbaum, export-import representative for apparel and textile producers, Washington (DC), July.Google Scholar
McGranahan, D. (1992) Oral presentation given by DavidMcGranahan at Brown Bag Lunch Series, Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Washington (DC), June.Google Scholar
Molle, W. (1990) The Economics of European Integration: Theory, Practice, Policy. Brookfield, MA: Dartmouth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Newquist, D. (1992) “The Trade Pact—Plus a Tax.” The New York Times (12 August): A–15.Google Scholar
Off, J. (1992) Author interview with Joseph Off, Director of the Apparel and Textile Technology Institute, Raleigh (NC), May.Google Scholar
Redmund, J. (1992) “Implications of the NAFTA on Rural America” (unpublished manuscript). Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Ritchie, G. (1992) “Trade Tempered.” Hemisfile 3,4 (July): 1-2 and 12.Google Scholar
Robinson, S., Burfisher, M., Hinojosa-Ojeda, R., and Thierfelder, K. (1992) “Agricultural Policies and Migration in a US-Mexico Free Trade Area: A Computible General Equilibrium Analysis,” Addendum Paper #9 in US International Trade Commission (ed.) Economy-Wide Modeling of the Economic Implications of a FTA with Mexico and a NAFTA with Canada and Mexico (US-ITC públication 2516, May). Washington, DC: US International Trade Commission.Google Scholar
Roland-Holst, D., Reinert, K., and Smells, C. (1992) “North American Trade Liberalization,” in US-ITC (ed.) Economy-Wide Modeling of the Economic Implications of a FTA with Mexico and a NAFTA with Canada and Mexico (US-ITC públication 2516, May). Washington, DC: US International Trade Commission.Google Scholar
Rudy, D. (1992) Author interview with Dennis Rudy, Director of Office of Textiles and Apparel Research, International Trade Commission, Washington (DC), May.Google Scholar
Salinas, DE Gortari, C. (1991) Response of President of Mexico to questions regarding proposed North American Free Trade Treaty, University of Texas-Austin, 26 October.Google Scholar
Shiells, C. and Shelburne, R. (1992) “A Summary of Industrial Effects of a Free Trade Agreement between Mexico and the USA,” in US-ITC (ed.) Economy-Wide Modeling of the Economic Implications of a FTA with Mexico and a NAFTA with Canada and Mexico (US-ITC públication 2516, May). Washington, DC: US International Trade Commission.Google Scholar
Sobarzo, H. (1992) “A General Equilibrium Analysis of the Gains from Trade for the Mexican Economy of a North American Free Trade Agreement,” Addendum Paper #11 in US International Trade Commission (ed.) Economy-Wide Modeling of the Economic Implications of a FTA with Mexico and a NAFTA with Canada and Mexico (USITC públication 2516, May). Washington, DC: US International Trade Commission.Google Scholar
Summers, R. and Heston, A. (1991) “The Penn World Table (Mark 5): An Expanded Set of International Comparisons, 1950-1988.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 22 (May): 327–368.Google Scholar
Texas. State Office of the Comptroller (1991) Special Financial Report: “The US-Mexico Free Trade Pact: Payoffs and Tradeoffs” (November). Austin, TX: Texas Office of the Comptroller.Google Scholar
Texiera, R. (1992) Author interview with Rudy Texiera, US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Wasliington (DC), July.Google Scholar
US Council of the Mexico-US Business Committee (1991) “Analysis of the Economic Effects of a Free Trade Area between the United States and Mexico.” (27 February). Washington, DC: US Council of the Mexico-US Business Committee.Google Scholar
United States. Government Accounting Office (US-GAO) (1991a) “US-Mexico Trade: Impact of Liberalization in the Agricultural Sector.” (GAO/NSTAD-91-155: 39-50). Washington, DC: GAO Google Scholar
United States. Government Accounting Office (US-GAO) (1991b) “US-Mexico Trade: Extent to which Mexican Horticultural Exports Complement US Production” (GAO/ NSIAD-91-94BR, March). Washington, DC: GAO.Google Scholar
United States. International Trade Commission (US-ITC) (1992) Economy-Wide Modeling of the Economic Implications of a FTA with Mexico and a NAFTA with Canada and Mexico (USITC públication 2516, May). Washington, DC: US International Trade Commission.Google Scholar
Viñals, J., Andres, J., García, J., Gonzalez-Paramo, J.M., Gual, J., Manas, L., Martin, C., Torres, A., and Vives, X.. (1990) “Spain and the ‘EC cum 1992’ Shock,” pp. 145–234 in Bliss, Christopher and de Macedo, Jorge Braga (eels.) Unity with Diversity in the European Economy. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Warneco, (1992) Author interview with Manager of Warneco branch plant, Millen (GA), May.Google Scholar
Wino, G. (1992) Author interview with George Wino, Senior Economist, the American Textile Manufacturers Institute, Washington (DC), April.Google Scholar
World Bank (1992) World Tables 1991. Wellington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar