Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T18:35:54.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Rio Group: Decline or Consolidation of the Latin American Concertación Policy*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Extract

At the end of 1986, when Contadora and its Support Group reduced their presence in Central America, their member countries decided to create a permanent organism for consultation and agreement, thus re-orienting and extending their working agenda, which had originally been limited to the issues of Central American policy and, in the economic area (through the Cartagena Group), to the problem of external debt. Several factors prompted them to take this course. First, all had found the experiment in concertación policymaking to be valuable and were reluctant to lose the experience and momentum acquired over the years. Second, it was apparent that changing circumstances had altered their position in resolving the Central America crisis, so that the Contadora and Support Groups found themselves playing only a secondary role in the negotiations and becoming increasingly marginalized. Furthermore, some countries felt that the excessive emphasis on the Central American problem had circumscribed the ability of the Group to focus on other issues which, as tensions eased in Central America, were gaining priority on the foreign policy agendas of their respective governments.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This article first appeared in Spanish in the 1990-91 Anuario de Políticas Exteriores Latinoamericanas: ¿Hacia unas relaciones internacionales de mercado? edited by Jorge Heine and published by Nueva Sociedad in Caracas (Venezuela) for PROSPEL. English translation is by Jane Marchi.

References

Caputo, D. (1991) “Grupo de los ocho: entre Alaska y tierra de fuego.” Nueva Sociedad 111 (January-February): 4-8.Google Scholar
Caputo, D. (1989) “Interview.” America Latina/Internacional 4 (September).Google Scholar
(El) Día (international edition) (1991) “Cruce de posiciones.” No. 38 (11 February): 3.Google Scholar
(El) Diario de Caracas (1990a) “Crisis energética será analizada por grupo de Río.” (10 October).Google Scholar
(El) Diario de Caracas (1990b) (6 October): 3.Google Scholar
Economía Hoy (Caracas) (1990) “Hacia dónde conduce el río.” (11 October): 4.Google Scholar
(La) Epoca (Santiago) (1990a) (12 October): 2.Google Scholar
(La) Epoca (Santiago) (1990b) “Por primera vez Europa del Este y América Latina plantean cooperación política y económica.” (13 April): 3.Google Scholar
Frohmann, A. (1990) Puentes sobre la turbulencia: la concertación política latinoamericana en los ochenta. Santiago, Chile: Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales (FLACSO).Google Scholar
Grupo de los Ocho (1989) “Declaración sobre la situación en Panamá” (10 May). Bogotá, Colombia.Google Scholar
Grupo de Río (1990a) Declaración de Roma sobre las relaciones entre el Grupo de Río y la Comunidad Europea (20 December). Rome, Italy: Grupo de Rio.Google Scholar
Grupo de Rio (1990b) Comunicado conjunto de los presidentes que conforman el Grupo de Río sobre la lucha contra el tráfico ilicito de estupefacientes y sustancias psicotrópicas (12 October). Caracas, Venezuela.Google Scholar
Grupo de Rio (1990c) Declaración de Caracas, IV cumbre del mecanismo permanente de consulta y concertación política, Caracas, Venezuela, (11-12 October).Google Scholar
Instituto de Relaciones Europeo Latinoamericana (IRELA) (1989) “El Grupo de los ocho: ¿un nuevo interlocutor regional en America Latina?” No. 17 (May). Madrid, Spain: IRELA.Google Scholar
Journal do Brasil (Rio de Janeiro) (1986) 18 December.Google Scholar
Luna, R. (1989) Interview with author (July). Santiago de Chile.Google Scholar
(El) Mercurio (Santiago) (1990) “Unificaran criterios para enfrentar iniciativa Bush.” (13 October): A-l.Google Scholar
Mols, M. (1988) “Regionalism in Latin America and South-East Asia.” Aussenpolitik 39, 3: 278-293.Google Scholar
(El) Nacional (Caracas) (1990a) “Grupo de Río analizó recesión en EE.UU.” (14 October).Google Scholar
(El) Nacional (Caracas) (1990b) “Fondo de materias primas para dar poder negociador a América Latina.” (13 October).Google Scholar
Perez, C. (1990a) “Declaraciones de Carlos Andrés P´rez.” El Universal (Caracas) (14 October).Google Scholar
Perez, C. (1990b) “Declaraciones.” La Jornada (Mexico) (13 October): 1.Google Scholar
(La) Prensa (Buenos Aires) (1990) “El Plan Bush fortalece la integratión latinoamericana.” (11 October).Google Scholar
Programa de Seguimiento de las Políticas Exteriores Latinoamericanos (PROSPEL) (1989) Anuario de Políticas Exteriores Latinoamericanos. Caracas, Venezuela: PROSPEL.Google Scholar
Programa de Seguimiento de las Politicas Exteriores Latinoamericanos (PROSPEL) (1988) Anuarios de Políticas Exteriores Latinoamericanos. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Grupo Editor Latinoamericano.Google Scholar
Programa de Seguimiento de las Politicas Exteriores Latinoamericanos (PROSPEL) (1987) Anuarios de Políticos Exteriores Latinoamericanos. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Grupo Editor Latinoamericano.Google Scholar
Programa de Seguimiento de las Politicas Exteriores Latinoamericanos (PROSPEL) (1986) Anuarios de Políticos Exteriores Latinoamericanos. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Grupo Editor Latinoamericano.Google Scholar
Revista Mexicana de Política Exterior (1990) “Comunicado emitido al término de la VII reunion ordinaria del mecanismo de consulta y concertación política.” No. 27 (Summer): 103-105.Google Scholar
Solana, F. (1990) “El Grupo es útil para América Latina.” El Nacional (Caracas) (11 October).Google Scholar
(El) Universal (Caracas) (1990) “La cumbre de Caracas ha sido la más fructífica de todos.” (14 October).Google Scholar
Uruguay (1990) “Declaraciones del Presidente.” El Universal (Caracas) (12 October).Google Scholar
Yopo H., B. (1991) “Crisis y concertación política en los ochenta: la experiencia de Contadora y el Grupo de Río,” in Heraldo Muñoz and Joseph Tulchin (eds.) Latin American Nations in World Politics. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar