Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:00:42.702Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rhetoric and Reality:The Inter-American System's Second Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Extract

In 1989 The Inter-American System will celebrate its centennial anniversary, tracing its lineage to the International Union of the American Republics formed at Secretary of State Blaine's Washington convocation in 1889. Over the years the mantle was passed, first, to the Pan American Union, and then to the system's present incumbent, the Organization of American States (OAS). It has been a century of unprecedented achievement and unremitting frustration, of great triumphs and repeated failures. Given the present state of the system, however, the major question is whether the system can endure, much less match the rhetoric and aspirations of its members, in its second century.

International cooperation is a political decision in search of a framework. The Organization of American States is the attempt to express and enhance that cooperation among the nations of the Western Hemisphere. It is, and can be, no better than the underlying relationships among the nations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Crawford., W (1961) A Century of Latin American Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mecham, J. L. (1961) The US and Inter-American Security. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Padilla, E. (1943) Free Men of America. New York, NY: Ziff-Davis Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Scheman, L. R. (1983) “Regionalism Reconsidered,” pp. 505527 in Vary, Viron (ed) Governance in the Western Hemisphere. New York, NY: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Scheman, L.R. and Ford, J. (1985) “The OAS as Mediator,” pp. 197202 in Saadia Touval and Zartman, William (eds.) International Mediation in Theory and Practice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) (1979) UPI Report of SIPRI study, 16 August. Stockholm, Sweden: SIPRI.Google Scholar
Whitaker, A. (1954) The Western Hemisphere Idea. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar