Article contents
The Regionalist Expression of Populism: Guayaquil and the CFP, 1948-1960
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2018
Extract
In any general discussion of populism, Latin America is the odd man out [Hennessy, 1969: 28].
Even a cursory review of recent writings on Latin American politics suggests an inclination by many to have done once and for all with the concept of populism. Either it is defined so broadly as to be useless or is relegated to a historical era presumably never again to be seen in the region. Yet the term shows a vitality and stubborn resilience in refusing to disappear, notwithstanding periodic revisions and redefinitions. This is scarcely unique to Latin Americanists. As a pair of European authorities contended more generally:
There can, at present, be no doubt about the importance of populism. But no one is quite clear just what it is. As a doctrine or as a movement, it is elusive and protean. It bobs up everywhere, but in many and contradictory shapes. Does it have any underlying unity, or does one name cover a multitude of unconnected tendencies? [Ionescu and Gellner, 1969: 1].
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , August 1980 , pp. 289 - 314
- Copyright
- Copyright © University of Miami 1980
References
- 19
- Cited by