Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T06:10:08.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Politics, Partisanship, and Social Position in Belize

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

David Hanson*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan 49001

Extract

This paper presents data on the social and political opinions of junior college students in Belize (British Honduras) prior to independence. The data are intended to give a preliminary indication of current patterns of conflict and consensus which can be used as a bench mark against which future development in Belizean political culture can be measured. The organization of the data has been based on theoretical considerations of political development and socialization in transitional societies.

A major influence on political attitudes and partisanship is the impact of social identity. In the United States, a self-identification as a Republican or a Democrat usually carries connotations of a wider range of social characteristics. In fact, people often adopt the partisan identification most appropriate to their social situation. Once acquired, partisan attitudes tend to influence other political attitudes as people react to issues and events in a way that tends to support and justify their party choices (Dawson and Prewitt, 1969).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belize, (1966) Annual Abstract of Statistics. Belize: Central Planning Unit.Google Scholar
Binder, L. (1971) Crises and Sequences in Political Development. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Bustowe, L. and Wright, P. (1888) The Handbook of British Honduras: 1888-1889. Edinburgh: Blackwood.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. et al. (1966) The American Voter. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Census (1960) Census of British Honduras. Kingston: Jamaica Tabulation Centre.Google Scholar
Dawson, R. and Prewitt, K. (1969) Political Socialization: An Analytical Study. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. (1968) Revolution and Counter Revolution. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Melson, R. and Wolpe, H. (1970) “Modernization and the politics of communialism: a theoretical perspective.” Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev. 64 (December): 11121130.Google Scholar
Osgood, C., Suci, G., and Tannenbaum, P. (1957) The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Premdis, R. (1972) “Elections and political campaigns in a racially bifurcated state: the case of Guyana.” J. of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 14 (August): 271296.Google Scholar
Pye, L. (1962) Politics, Personality and Nation-Building: Burma's Search for Identity. New Haven, Conn.: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Pye, L. and Verba, S. (1965) Political Culture and Political Development. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggs, F. (1957) “Agraria and industria,” in Siffin, W. (ed.) Toward the Comparative Study of Public Administration. Bloomington: Univ. of Indiana Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, J., Rusk, J., and Head, K. (1968) Measures of Political Attitudes. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
Stokes, D. (1969) The Study of Political Generations. Harlow: Longmans, Univ. of Essex Press.Google Scholar
Tsurutani, T. (1973) The Politics of National Development: Political Leadership in Transitional Societies. San Francisco: Chandler.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, M. (1967) Revolutionary Politics and the Cuban Working Class. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar