Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:41:53.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Operation Condor: Mexico's Antidrug Campaign Enters a New Era

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Richard Craig*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio

Extract

In recent years Mexico has demonstrated the capacity to cultivate, process, ship, and transship vast quantities of illegal narcotic drugs. Such activity has traditionally been geared to the realities of domestic poverty, enormous profit, and American demand. Mexican marijuana dominated the U.S. market until quite recently. More importantly from the American viewpoint were the tons of Mexican heroin which saturated U.S. cities in the mid-1970s. Furthermore, Mexico is still the source of vast quantities of psychotropics and an increasingly popular conduit for South American cocaine.

According to Craig (1978), U.S. officials long sought to convince their Mexican counterparts that the key to any effective antidrug program lay in eliminating the illicit product at the source. Until such time that herbicides were applied on a massive scale against marijuana and opium poppies, they argued, the annual Mexican campaign would prove an exercise in futility.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Christian Science Monitor (1976) March 31.Google Scholar
Craig, R. B. (1979) “Human rights and Mexico's antidrug campaign.” Presented to the Rocky Mountain Council on Latin American Studies, May.Google Scholar
Craig, R. B. (1978) “La Campaña permanente: Mexico's antidrug campaign.” J. of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 20 (May): 107131.Google Scholar
Dowdy, J. [pseudonym] (1979) “Spice Valley U.S.A.: marijuana moonshiners.” Atlantic Monthly 243 (January): 6ff.Google Scholar
Drug Enforcement (1975-1976) “Mexico.” Volume 1 (Fall): 913.Google Scholar
Excelsior (1980) January 22.Google Scholar
Excelsior (1978) February 15.Google Scholar
Excelsior (1977) January 16.Google Scholar
Excelsior (1976a) February 4.Google Scholar
Excelsior (1976b) January 8.Google Scholar
Interview (1980) Jalapa, Veracruz: University of Veracruz (January 12).Google Scholar
Interview (1979) Mexico, D.F.: U.S. Embassy (February 19).Google Scholar
Interview (1978a) Mexico, D.F.: U.S. Embassy (February 14).Google Scholar
Interview (1978b) Mexico, D.F.: U.S. Embassy (February 13).Google Scholar
Interview (1977) Mexico, D.F.: U.S. Embassy (January 10).Google Scholar
Interview (1976a) Mexico, D.F.: Procuraduría General de la República Mexicana (February 13).Google Scholar
Interview, (1976b) Mexico, D.F.: U.S. Embassy (January 16). *Google Scholar
McConahay, M. J. (1976) “Mexico's war on poppies—and peasants.” New Times 7 (September 3): 3338.Google Scholar
Miami Herald (1977) August 28.Google Scholar
New York Times (1976) January 2.Google Scholar
Procuraduría [Mexico, D.F.] (1979) February 16. (mimeo)Google Scholar
Pyes, C. (1977) “The war of the flowers.” Oui (October 10): 94ff.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Justice (1976) Press Release, June 8. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Wright, L. (1976) “Mainlining the Mexican revolution.” New Times 7 (September 3): 2132.Google Scholar