Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:30:53.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nuclear Power in Latin America: An Overview of Its Present Status

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Margarete K. Luddemann*
Affiliation:
Interdevelopment, Inc., Arlington, Virginia

Extract

The pivotal role energy plays in national economics not only converts the access to sources of supply into a vivid issue of foreign policy concern, but also causes an understandable preoccupation with investment capabilities and self-sufficiency. A report prepared by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in 1974 predicted a bright future for nuclear energy in the i developing countries and encouraged use of this form of energy after numerous field studies.

A nation that commits itself to nuclear energy by purchasing nuclear power-generating technology but not fuel cycle facilities incurs the risk of becoming dependent upon the supplier country because a quick switch to alternative sources of supply is difficult in cases of curtailment of fuel.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez, R., Castillo, H., Costa, D., Galán, I., and Martinez, M. (1981) “Energía nuclear en un pais petrolero.” Revista Mexicana de Fisica 27, 3: 281326.Google Scholar
Atominformationen [Bonn, FRG] (1980) “Kurzmeldungen.” (February): 79.Google Scholar
Atomwitschaft [Duesseldorf, FRG] (1981) “Brasilienabkommen—quo vadis?” (May): 314315.Google Scholar
Castro, A. B. de and Gomes, F. M. (1981) “La crisis energética: una perspectiva Brasileña.” Comercio Exterior [México, D.F.] (November): 12771286.Google Scholar
CEP AL [Comisión Económica para América Latina] (1982) “Cuba: evolución reciente de su economía.” Comercio Exterior (January): 2535.Google Scholar
Energy Detente (1982) “Mexico swapping crude for atoms?” June 24: 9.Google Scholar
Espiell, H. G. (1981) “El tradado de Tlatelolco para la proscripción de las armas nucleares en América Latina.” Interciencia (March-April): 8185.Google Scholar
Fahl, G. (1980) “Ein neues kooperatives nonproliferationskonzept? Zum Argentinisch- Brasilianischen kernergieabkommen von 1980.” Atomwitschaft (December): 623 624.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. (1982) “Fueling nuke plants.” R & D México [México, D.F.] (April): 1719.Google Scholar
González DE LEÓN, A. (1978) “Las relaciones México-Estados Unidos: el caso de la energía nuclear.” Foro Internacional [México, D.F.] (October-December): 326-341. Interciencia (1982) “Colombia construirá planta atómica.” (July-August): 242. Interdevelopment (1981) World Atomic Power and Its Fuel Cycle After Three Mile Island: A Guide for Marketing and Strategic Planning. Arlington, Virginia. (November)Google Scholar
Jornal do Brasil (1982a) “Pesquisa nuclear do Brasil nao tern finalidade militar.” July 9. (1982b) “Pesquisa nuclear com fim militar tem US$ 2 bilhóes.” July 12.Google Scholar
La Opinión [Buenos Aires] (1977) “'Opinión’ columnist summarizes nuclear policy.” October 23.Google Scholar
Lanl News Bulletin (1982) “Lab signs pact with Mexico's ININ.” April 2: 1-2. Los Alamos, NM: Los Alamos National Laboratory.Google Scholar
Latin America Economic Report (1979) “Venezuelan energy squeeze boosts nuclear option.” February 16: 54.Google Scholar
Latin American Markets (1981) Mexico. April 27: 11.Google Scholar
Latin America Regional Reports (1980) Brazil. “Alternative programmes still in first gear.” May 30: 7.Google Scholar
Latin America Weekly Report (1980a) “Brazil wages war on imported oil.” November 28: 9-10.Google Scholar
Latin America Weekly Report (1981b) Argentina/Uruguay. March 27: 3.Google Scholar
Latin America Weekly Report (1981c) Brazil. January 23: 3.Google Scholar
Luddemann, M. (1978) “Nuclear technology from West Germany: a case of disharmony in U.S.-Brazilian relations.” Georgetown University LASP Occasional Paper 1 (April): 5-6; 1820.Google Scholar
Marwah, O. and Schulz, A. (1975) Nuclear Proliferation and the Near-Nuclear Countries. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
Nuclear Engineering International [London] (1981) “Progress in selected developing countries.” (February): 3233.Google Scholar
Nuclear Engineering International [London] (1980) “Argentina nears nuclear self-sufficiency.” July: 5.Google Scholar
Nuclear News (1979) “Latin America: emerging nuclear market.” (September): 5964.Google Scholar
Nucleonics Week (1982a) “Brazil Senate probe may push nuclear program into election spotlight.” September 9: 12.Google Scholar
Nucleonics Week (1982b) “Argentina is getting nuclear export business to help balance its domestic slowdown.” August 12: 7.Google Scholar
Nucleonics Week (1982c) “Economic woes plus Falkland crisis cloud Argentine nuclear program.” June 24: 34.Google Scholar
Nucleonics Week (1982d) “Argentina has formally protested Britain's use of a nuclear submarine.” May 13: 5.Google Scholar
Nucleonics Week (1982e) “The USSR has completed the design of a nuclear plant for Cuba.” May 13:8.Google Scholar
Nucleonics Week (1981 a) “Brazil is negotiating for breeder technology and training with Italy.” May 21:6.Google Scholar
Nucleonics Week (1981b) “Possibilities for Canada remain as Argentina advances nuclear program.” May 7: 78.Google Scholar
Nucleonics Week (1981c) “High stakes for suppliers if Mexico can realize huge nuclear goals.” February 19: 23.Google Scholar
Nucleonics Week (198Id) ‘Argentina's right to conduct peaceful nuclear explosions remains central.” February 5: 6.Google Scholar
Nucleonics Week (1980a) “Near-term prospects for smaller reactors in Latin America virtually nil.” June 5: 1516.Google Scholar
Nucleonics Week (1980b) “Brazil and Argentina signed several nuclear cooperation accords.” May 22: 12.Google Scholar
Nucleonics Week (1980c) “Argentina wraps up German deal, hopes to open U.S. supply line.” May 15: 45.Google Scholar
Nucleonics Week (1980d) “Spain's junta de energía nuclear (JEN) has signed with Mexico.” April 24: 10.Google Scholar
Nucleonics Week (1980e) “The Chilean nuclear commission (Cochen) has postponed until 1985.” February 21: 8.Google Scholar
Nucleonics Week (1980f) “Mexico has signed with Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd.” January 10:12.Google Scholar
Nucleonics Week (1979a) “Mexico has selected Sweden's ASEA-atom to do a BWR feasibility study.” November 22: 5.Google Scholar
Nucleonics Week (1979b) “Mexican government has chosen France's Sofratome.” September 13:11.Google Scholar
Perez-Lopez, J. F. (1979) “The Cuban nuclear program.” Cuban Studies (January): 142.Google Scholar
República Federativa do Brasil (1977) O Programa Nuclear Brasileiro. Brasilia. (March): 15.Google Scholar
Roche, M. (1981) “Reactor, radioisótopos y energia nuclear: sus avateres en Venezuela.” Interciencia (March-April): 8692.Google Scholar
Sabato, J. A. (1972) “Energia atómica en Argentina.” Estudios Internacionales 2: 332356.Google Scholar
Sabato, J. A. and Frydman, R. J. (1976) “La energia nuclear en America Latina.” Estrategia (September-October): 5469.Google Scholar
Scanlan, T. (1982) “Outlook for Soviet oil.” Science (July 23): 325330.Google Scholar
Secretaria de Patrimonio y Fomento Industrial (1980) Programade Energia: Metas a 1990 y Proyecciones al Ano 2000 (Resumen y Conclusiones). Mexico, D.F.: Secretaria de Patrimonio y Fomento Industrial.Google Scholar
Simnad, M. (1981) “Progress in the developing countries.” Nuclear Engineering International (February): 2934.Google Scholar
Silva, L. da (n.d.) “Latin American oil requirements to 1985.” Technical Information Center, Interamerican Development Bank, Washington, D.C. (mimeo)Google Scholar
U.S. Congress (1982) “Cuba faces the economic realities of the 1980s.” Joint Economic Committee, March 22. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of State (1977) Airgram, “Argentina's nuclear policy.” A-140, November 2: 1. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Senate (1982) Statement of Undersecretary of State Richard T. Kennedy before the Subcommittee on Energy, Nuclear Proliferation and Governmental Processes, pp. 121 (May 13). Committee on Governmental Affairs. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Walsh, J. (1982) “New technologies for nonprohferation. Recover system is one of the technical aids for verification under development.” Science (July 16): 230231.Google Scholar
World Business Weekly [Financial Times of London] Energy Briefs. (1979) November 26: 19.Google Scholar