da Cruz, J.de A. (1993) “Democratic Consolidation and the Socio-Economic Crisis of Latin America” (review essay). Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 35, 1 (Spring): 145–152.Google Scholar

Dahl, R. (1971) Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dahl, R. (1982) Dilemmas of Pluralist Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

de Lima, V. A. (1993) “Brazilian Television in the 1989 Presidential Election Campaign: Constructing a President,” in Skidmore, Thomas E. (ed.) Television, Politics, and the Transition to Democracy in Latin America. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Lins da Silva, C. (1993) “The Brazilian Case: Manipulation by the Media?” in Skidmore, Thomas E. (ed.) Television, Politics, and the Transition to Democracy in Latin America. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Mainwaring, S. (1990) “Brazil: Weak Parties, Feckless Democracy” Paper presented at the 1990 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association (APSA), San Francisco (CA), 30 August-2 September.Google Scholar

Mainwaring, S., O'Donnell, G., and Valenzuela, J.S. (1992) Issues in Democratic Consolidation: The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Petras, J. and Morley, M. (1992) Latin America in the Time of Cholera: Electoral Politics, Market Economics, and Permanent Crisis. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, J. (1950) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York, NY: Harper & Row, Publishers.Google Scholar

Straubhaar, J., Elsen, O., and Cavaliari Nunes, M. (1993) “The Brazilian Case: Influencing the Voter,” in Skidmore, Thomas E. (ed.) Television, Politics, and the Transition to Democracy in Latin America. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Weffort, F. (1992) Quâl Democracia? [Which Democracy?]. São Paulo, Brazil: Companhia Das Letras.Google Scholar