Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:18:07.538Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Governing the City-State: Notes on the Politics of the Small Latin American Countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Roland H. Ebel*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Newcomb College, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana

Extract

One of the fundamental difficulties in the study of Latin American politics by North American scholars has been the attempt to apply the political experience of the United States (and, to a lesser extent, that of the developed countries of Europe and Asia) to that region. In attempting to interpret Latin America’s political patterns and understand her political difficulties, emphasis has been placed historically on such visible features as the instability of national governments, the lack of adequate party systems, the dysfunctional role of the military, inadequate constitutions, hierarchic social structures and a variety of deficiencies in the region’s political culture. In proceeding along these lines, analysts have been working from the implicit, although I believe unconscious, assumption that the Latin American nation-state constitutes a large, geographically dispersed polity. Until recently there has been very little effort to even study the political processes of the Latin American city, much less attempt to understand national politics in light of the region’s peculiar urban culture.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1972 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anms, R. N. (1970) Crucifixion by Power: Essays on Guatemalan Social Structure, 1944-1966. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, C. (1967) Political and Economic Change in Latin America: The Governing of Restless Nations. Princeton, N.J.: D. Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Beezley, W. H. (1969) “Caudillismo: an interpretive note.” J. of Inter-American Studies (July): 347352.Google Scholar
Bourricaud, F. (1966) “Structure and function of the Peruvian oligarchy.” Studies in Compartive International Development 2: 2325.Google Scholar
Hartz, L. (1964) “The heritage of Latin America,” in The Founding of New Societies. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Leeds, A. (1965) “Brazilian careers and social structure: a case history and model,” pp. 387398 in Heath, D. B. and Adams, R. N. (eds.) Contemporary Cultures and Societies of Latin America. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Macridis, R. C. and Brown, B. E. (1968) Comparative Politics: Notes and Readings. Homewood, 111.: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
Meecham, J. L. (1959) “Latin American constitutions: nominal and real.” J. of Politics 21 (May).Google Scholar
Newton, R. C. (1970 )“On ‘functional groups,’ ‘fragmentation,* and ‘pluralism'in Spanish American political society.” Hispanic Amer. Historical Rev. 1 (February): 129.Google Scholar
Phelan, J. L. (1960-1961) “Authority and flexibility in the Spanish imperial bureaucracy.” Administrative Sci. Q. 5 (June-March).Google Scholar
Scott, R. E. (1967) “Political elites and political modernization: the crisis of transition,” in Lipset, S. M. and Solari, A. (eds.) Elites in Latin America. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Shrawder, C. (1968) “A decision-making study of Quezaltenango.” M.A. thesis. Tulane University.Google Scholar