Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:57:18.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Democracy in Brazil and the Southern Cone: Achievements and Problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Scott Mainwaring
Scott Mainwaring*
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper analyzes the achievements and failures of the new democratic governments in Argentina (1983-), Uruguay (1985-), Brazil (1985-), and Chile (1990-). My comparisons focus on four fundamental issues: economic performance, the ability of governments to address the pressing problems of poverty and inequality, the quality of democratic practice, and the degree to which these governments and the democratic regimes have won popular support and legitimacy. Focusing on these questions is not to deny the significance of others, nor to suggest that citizens of these countries would see these four as the most pressing. The focus here will be on government; civil society will not be discussed in any detail.

This article develops four principal arguments. First, it argues that the performance of democracy has varied considerably in the four countries under discussion. Democracy in Chile, at least in its early phases, has been a success both politically and economically.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , Spring 1995 , pp. 113 - 180
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acuña, C. (1994) “Politics and Economics in the Argentina of the Nineties (or Why the Future No Longer Is What It Used to Be),” pp. 31–73 in Smith, William C., Acuña, Carlos H., and Gamara, Eduardo (eds.) Democracy, Markets, and Structural Reform in Latin America. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Angell, A. (n.d.) “What Remains of Pinochet's Chile?” (Occasional Paper 3). London, England: University of London, Institute of Latin American Studies.Google Scholar
Arriagada, G. and Graham, C. (1994) “Chile: Sustaining Adjustment during Democratic Transition,” pp. 242–289 in Haggard, Stephan and Webb, Steven B. (eds.) Voting for Reform: Democracy, Political Liberalization, and Economic Adjustment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press/World Bank.Google Scholar
Barbieto, A. (1991) “Distributión de ingresos, pobreza y estado de bienestar” (Documentos de Trabajo 3). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Centra Interdisciplinary para el Estudio de Políticas Públicas (CIEPP).Google Scholar
Cavarozzi, M. and Grossi, M. (1992) “Argentine Parties under Alfonsín: From Democratic Reinvention to Political Decline and Hyperinflation,” pp. 173–202 in Epstein, Edward C. (ed.) The New Argentine Democracy: The Search for a Successful Formula. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Centra de Estudios Públicos (1993) “Estudio social y de opinión pública” (19, March). Santiago, Chile: Centra de Estudios Públicas.Google Scholar
Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL) (1993) “Balance preliminar de la economía de América Latina y el Caribe 1993.” (17 December). Santiago de Chile: Naciones Unidas, CEPAL.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. (1971) Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Campello, de Souza, Do Carmo, M. (1989) “The Brazilian ‘New Republic:’ Under the ‘Sword of Damocles,’” pp. 351–394 in Stepan, A. (ed.) Democratizing Brazil. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
DaMatta, R. (1987) “The Quest for Citizenship in a Relational Universe,” pp. 307–335 in Wirth, John D., Oliveira Nunes, Edson de, and Bogenschild, Thomas E. (eds.) State and Society in Brazil: Continuity and Change. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
De Ipola, E. (1987) “La difícil apuesta del peronismo democrática,” pp. 333–374 in Nun, José and Portantiero, Juan Carlos (eds.) Ensayos sobre la transición democrática. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Puntosur.Google Scholar
Díaz, A. (1993) “Restructuring and the New Working Classes in Chile: Trends in Waged Employment, Informality and Poverty, 1973-1990.” (Discussion Paper 47; October). New York, NY: United Nations, Research Instiaite for Social Development.Google Scholar
Epstein, E. (ed.) (1992) The New Argentine Democracy: The Search for a Successful Formula. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Evans, P. (1992) “The State as Problem and Solution: Predation, Embedded Autonomy, and Structural Change,” pp. 139–181 in Haggard, Stephan and Kaufman, Robert R. (eds.) The Politics of Economic Adjustment: International Constraints, Distributive Conflicts, and the State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estudio Sociológico y Político (1993) “Síntesis de Junio de 1993: Análisis sociopolítico de la coyuntura argentina.” Buenos Aires, Argentina: Mora y Araujo, Noguera y Asociados.Google Scholar
Fanelli, J., Frenkel, R. and Rozenwurcel, G. (1992) “Transformación estructural, estabilización y reforma del estado en la Argentina” (Documento 82; August). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Centro de Estudios para una Democracia Social (CEDES).Google Scholar
Faria, V. (1994) “The Current Social Situation in Brazil: Dilemmas and Perspectives” (Kellogg Institute Working Paper, Democracy and Social Policy Series 1; Spring). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame, Kellogg Institute.Google Scholar
Ffrench-Davis, R. (1991) “Desarrollo económico y equidad en Chile: herencias y desafíos en el retorno a la democracia.” Estudios CIEPLAN 31 (March): 31-51.Google Scholar
Filgueira, C. (1994) “Heterogeneity and Incidence of Urban Poverty in Uruguay” (Kellogg Institute Working Paper, Democracy and Social Policy Series 9). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame, Kellogg Institute.Google Scholar
Fishlow, A. (199D) “Some Reflections on Comparative Latin American Economic Performance and Policy,” pp. 148–170 in Banuri, Tariq (ed.) Economic Liberalization: No Panacea. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fishlow, A. (1990) “The Latin American State.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 4, 3 (Summer): 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerchunoff, P. (ed.) (1992) Las privatizaciones en la Argentina: Primera etapa. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Instituto Torcuato De Tella.Google Scholar
Golbert, L. and Tenti Fanfani, E. (1993) “Estructura social y pobreza en la Argentina: escenario de los ‘90” (Documentos de Trabajo 8; January). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Centre Interdisciplinary para el Estudio de Políticas Públicas. (CIEPP).Google Scholar
Graham, C. (1991) “From Emergency Employment to Social Investment: Alleviating Poverty in Chile” (Brookings Occasional Paper). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Hagopian, F. (forthcoming) Traditional Political Elites and Regime Changes. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
ISTOÉ Senhor (1991) “Rumo ao Quarto Mundo.” No. 1121 (20 March): 16.Google Scholar
Ippolito, G. (1994) “Political Orientations of Argentina's Urban Poor: Democracy, Capitalism, and the State.” MA paper prepared for the University of Notre Dame (IN).Google Scholar
Lamounier, B. (1989) “Brazil: Inequality Against Democracy,” pp. 111–157 in Diamond, Larry, Linz, Juan J., and Lipset, Seymour Martin (eds.) Democracy in Developing Countries: Latin America, Vol. 4. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, S. and Scully, T. (1995) “Party Systems in Latin America,” pp. 1–34 and 477-482 in Mainwaring, Scott and Scully, Timothy (eds.) Building Democratic Instiaitions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
McCoy, J. (forthcoming) “The Collective Dilemma of Economic Reform: Uruguay in Comparative Perspective.” Unpublished mss.Google Scholar
Meller, P. (1990) “Adjustment and Social Costs in Chile During the 1980s.” World Development 19, 11: 1545–1561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mieres, P. (1991) “Elecciones de 1989 en Uruguay: una interpretación del cambio del sistema de partidos.” Sintesis 13 (April-June): 205–228.Google Scholar
Moisés, J. (1993) “Elections, Political Parties and Political Culture in Brazil: Changes and Continuities.” Journal of Latin American Studies 25, 3 (October): 575–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mora Y Araujo, M. (1991) Ensayo y error. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Planeta.Google Scholar
Muñoz, O. (ed.) (1993) Después de las privatizaciones: Hacia el estado regulador. Santiago de Chile: Corporación de Investigaciones Económicas para América Latina (CIEPLAN).Google Scholar
Muñoz, O. and Schamis, H. (1992) “Las transformaciones del estado en Chile y la privatización,” pp. 279–301 in Vial, Joaquín (ed.) ¿Adónde va América Latina?: balance de las reformas económicas. Santiago, Chile: Corporación de Investigaciones Económicas para América Latina (CIEPLAN).Google Scholar
Nun, J. (1987) “Cambios en la estructura social de la Argentina,” pp. 117–137 in Nun, José and Portantiero, Juan Carlos (eds.) Ensayos sobre la transición democrática. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Puntosur.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, G. (1994) “Delegative Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 5, 1 Qanuary): 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, G. (1993) “On the State, Democratization, and Some Conceptual Problems: A Latin American View with Glances at Some Postcommunist Countries.” World Development 21, 8 (October): 1355–1369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, G. (1992) “Transitions, Continuities, and Paradoxes,” pp. 17–56 in Mainwaring, Scott, O'Donnell, Guillermo, and Valenzuela, J. Samuel (eds.) Issues in Democratic Consolidation: The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, G. (1991) “Argentina, de nuevo.” (Kellogg Institute Working Paper 152; February). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, G. (1973) Modernization and Bureaucratic Authoritarianism. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Institute of International Studies.Google Scholar
Packenham, R. (1994) “The Politics of Economic Liberalization: Argentina and Brazil in Comparative Perspective” (Kellogg Institute Working Paper 206; April). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Palermo, V. (forthcoming) “Menemismo: Will it Last?” in James Brennan (ed.) Peronism. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Palermo, V. and Torre, J. (forthcoming) “A la sombra de la hiperinflacion: la politica de reformas estructurales en Argentina.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Pereira L., Bresser (1993) “Economic Reforms and Cycles of State Intervention.” World Development 21,8 (October): 1337–1353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, L. Bresser J., Maravall and Przeworski, A. (1993) Economic Reforms in New Democracies. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perelli, C. and Rial, J. (1992) “Las elecciones uruguayas de noviembre de 1989,” pp. 601–645 in Cerdas-Caiz, Rodolfo, Rial, Juan, and Zovatto, Daniel (eds.) Elecciones y democracia en América Latina, 1988-1991: Una tarea inconclusa. San José, Costa Rica: Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos.Google Scholar
Power, T. (1994) “The Pen is Mightier that the Congress: Presidential Decree Power in Brazil.” Paper prepared for the XVIII Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, Atlanta (GA), 10-12 March.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. (1991) Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rial, J. (1990) “Transición hacia la democracia y restauración en el Uruguay: 1985-1989,” pp. 247–292 in Alfonsín, Raúl et al. Agenda para la consolidación de la democracia en América Latina. San José, Costa Rica: Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos, Centro de Asesoría y Promotion Electoral.Google Scholar
Rius, A. and González, L. (1988) “La opinión pública montevideana a cuatro años de la restauración democrática.” Revista Umguaya de Ciencia Política 2: 61–80.Google Scholar
Romāo, M. (1991) “Distribuiãào de renda, pobreza e desigüaldades regionais no Brasil,” in Camargo, J.M. and Giambiagi, F. (eds.) Distribuiãào de renda no Brasil. São Paulo, Brazil: Paz e Terra.Google Scholar
Sáez, R. (1993) “Las privatizaciones de empresas en Chile,” pp. 75-109 in Oscar Muñoz (ed.) Después de las privatizaciones: Hacia el estado regulador. Santiago de Chile: Corporatión de Investigaciones Económicas para América Latina (CIEPLAN).Google Scholar
Dos Santos, W. (1985) “A Pós-'Revolução’ Brasileira,” pp. 223–335 in Jaguaribe, Hélio etal. Brasil, Sociedade Democratica. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: José Olympio.Google Scholar
Scully, T. (1994) “The Political Underpinnings of Economic Liberalization in Chile” (Kellogg Institute Working Paper 211; July). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame, Kellogg Institute.Google Scholar
Scully, T. and Ferreiro, A. Y (1992) “Chile Recovers its Democratic Past: Democratization by Installment.” Journal of Legislation 18, 2: 317–329.Google Scholar
Singh, A. (1994) “Asian Economic Successes and Latin American Failure in the 1980s: New Analyses and Future Policy Implications” (Kellogg Institute Working Paper 204; March). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame, Kellogg Institute.Google Scholar
Sola, L. (1994) “The State, Structural Refonn, and Democratization in Brazil,” pp. 151–181 in Smith, William C., Acuna, Carlos H., and Gamara, Eduardo (eds.) Democracy, Markets, and Structural Reform in Latin America: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, and Mexico. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.Google Scholar
Smith, W. (1992) “Hyperinflation, Macroeconomic Instability, and Neoliberal Restructuring in Democratic Argentina,” pp. 20–60 in Epstein, Edward C. (ed.) The New Argentine Democracy: The Search for a Successful Formula. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Tironi, E. (1990) Autoritarismo, modernizatión y marginalidad. Santiago de Chile: Sur.Google Scholar
Tironi, E. (1988) Los silencios de la revolutión. Santiago de Chile: Editorial La Puerta Abierta.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, J. (forthcoming) “Hacia una recuperación de la democracia en Chile.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, J. (1992) “Democratic Consolidation in Post-Transitional Settings: Notion, Process, and Facilitating Conditions,” pp. 57–104 in Mainwaring, Scott, O'Donnell, Guillermo, and Samuel Valenzuela, J. (eds.) Issues in Democratic Consolidation: The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Veja (1994) “Pesquisa do IBGE derruba vários mitos.” No. 1331 (16 March): 97; [IGBE=Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística].Google Scholar
Vergara, P. (1986) “Changes in the Economic Functions of the Chilean State under the Military Regime,” pp. 85–116 in Samuel Valenzuela, J. and Valenzuela, Arturo (eds.) Military Rule in Chile: Dictatorship and Oppositions. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Waisman, C. (1992) “Argentina's Revolution from Above: State Economic Transformation and Political Realignment,” pp. 228–243 in Epstein, Edward C. (ed.) The New Argentine Democracy: The Search for a Successful Fonnula. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Waisman, C. (1989) “Argentina: Autarkic Industrialization and Illegitimacy,” pp. 59–109 in Diamond, Larry, Linz, Juan J., and Lipset, Seymour Martin (eds.) Democracy in Developing Countries: Latin America (Vol. 4). Boulder, CO: Lynne Riener.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waisman, C. (1987) Reversal of Development in Argentina. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (1993a) Poverty and Income Distiibution: The Story of the 1980s (31 March). Washington, DC: The World Bank, Technical Department for Latin America and the Caribbean.Google Scholar
World Bank (1993b) World Development Report. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar