Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:23:09.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Politics of Sustainable Development Environmental Policy Making in Four Brazilian States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Barry Ames  and
Margaret E. Keck
Barry Ames
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Margaret E. Keck
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The term sustainable development has become a catch phrase of the 1990s, a handy slogan for politicians, bureaucrats, environmental activists, multinational aid officials, and even business leaders. Implementing sustainable development policy, however, is no mere technical problem. Indeed, environmental policy making is classically political: a competition among multiple interests with differing goals, resources, tactics, information, and time horizons. Who “sustains” what, for whom, why, and how? These questions underpin any analysis of the politics of environmental policy.

Scholars have paid little attention to the political side of environmental policy making in developing countries. Although environmental policy making is often understood as a case of “diffusion,” in which ideas flowed from Western Europe and the United States to the developing world, the acceptance of new ideas is always mediated by local institutions and cultures (Sikkink, 1991). Furthermore, as international linkages have come to involve more and more actors outside foreign ministries, the form of diffusion differs from classic examples like social security policy (Collier and Messick, 1975).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs , Volume 39 , Issue 4 , Winter 1997 , pp. 1 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

For research contributing to this article, Margaret E. Keck received financial assistance from the Howard Heinz Endowment (Center for Latin American Studies, University of Pittsburgh, Research Grant on Current Latin American Issues), the Joint Committee on Latin American Studies of the Social Science Research Council, the American Council of Learned Societies (with funds provided by the Ford Foundation), and the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. Barry Ames received financial assistance from Washington University, St. Louis; and the University of Pittsburgh. This research began as a consulting project for the World Bank, which naturally bears no responsibility for any statements in this article.

References

Acselrad, Henri (1996). “Política ambiental e discurso democrático—o caso do Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente.” Paper presented to the Working Group Ecología e Sociedade, 20th Annual Meeting of ANPOCS, Caxambú, Minas Gerais, 22-26 October.Google Scholar
Almeida, Maria Hermeinia Tavares de (1994). “O corporativismo em declinio?” pp. 51–58 in Dagnino, Evelina (ed.), Anos 90: Política e Sociedade no Brasil. São Paulo: Brasiliense.Google Scholar
Ames, Barry (1995). “Electoral Strategy Under Open-List Proportional Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 39, 2 (May): 406–433.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D. (1991). “Agenda Dynamics and Policy Subsystems.” Journal of Politics 53, 4: 1044-74.Google Scholar
Brazil. Paraná State Legislature (1991). Law of Ecological Royalties (“Lei Beraldin“). Complementary law no. 59.Google Scholar
Cavalcanti, Cleóvis (1995). Desenvolvimento e natureza: estudos para uma sociedade sustentável. São Paulo: Cortez.Google Scholar
Collier, David and Messick, Richard (1975). “Prerequisites Versus Diffusion: Testing Alternative Explanations of Social Security Adoption.” American Political Science Review 69, 4: 1299–1315.Google Scholar
Fuks, Mario (1996). “Do discurso ao recurso: uma análise da proteção judicial ao meio ambiente do Rio de Janeiro,” pp. 189–216 in Leila da Costa Ferreira and Eduardo Viola (eds.), Incertezas de sustentabilidade na globalização. Campinas: Editora Unicamp.Google Scholar
Guimarães, Roberto Pereira (1991). The Ecopolitics of Development in the Third World: Politics and Environment in Brazil. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Guimaráes Neto, Leonardo (1995). “Desigualdades regionais e federalismo,” pp. 13–59 in de Bruto Alvares Alfonso, Rui and Silva, Pedro Linz Barros (eds.), Desigualdades regionais e desenvolvimento. São Paulo: FUNDAP/Editora da Universidade Estadual Paulista.Google Scholar
Hagoplan, Frances (1996). Traditional Politics and Regime Change in Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hochstetler, Kathryn (1998). “The Evolution of the Brazilian Environmental Movement and Its Political Roles,” pp. 192–216 in Chalmers, Douglas, Vilas, Carlos M., Hite, Katherine R., Martin, Scott B., Piester, Kerianne, and Segarra, Monique (eds.), The New Politics of Inequality in Latin America: Rethinking Participation and Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keck, Margarete. (forthcoming). “Brazil's Planafloro: The Limits of Leverage,” in Fox, Jonathan and David Brown, L. (eds.), The Struggle for Accountability: The World Bank, NGOs, and Grassroots Movements. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E. and Sikkink, Kathryn (forthcoming). Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Lamounier, Bolivar and Nohlen, Dieter (1993). Presidencialismo ou parlamentarismo. São Paulo: IDESP.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott (1995). “Brazil: Weak Parties, Feckless Democracy,” pp. 354–398 in Mainwaring, and Scully, Timothy (eds.), Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Scott (1998). “Beyond Corporatism: New Patterns of Representation in the Brazilian Auto Industry,” pp. 45–71 in Chalmers, Douglas et al. (eds.), The New Politics of Inequality in Latin America: Rethinking Participation and Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martine, George (1995). “A evolução espacial da população brasileira,” pp. 61–91 in de Britto Alvares Affonso, Rui and Silva, Pedro Linz Barros (eds.), Desigualdades regionais e desenvolvimento. São Paulo: FUNDAP/Editora da Universidade Estadual Paulista.Google Scholar
Minc, Carlos (1985). Como fazer movimento ecológico e defender a natureza e as liberdades. Petrópolis: Vozes.Google Scholar
Neves, Maria Manuela Renha de Novis (1988). Elites políticas: competicáo e dinámica partidário-eleitoral: o caso de Mato Grosso. Rio de Janeiro: IUPERJ/Vertice.Google Scholar
Rondônia NGO Forum (1994). “Letter from the Forum of Non-Governmental Organizations of Rondônia to the President and Executive Directors of the World Bank.” Porto Velho, Rondónia. 15 June.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe (1971). Interest Conflict and Political Change in Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn (1991). Ideas and Institutions: Developmentalism in Brazil and Argentina. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Tapia, Jorge Rubem Biton (1994) “Corporativismo societal no Brasil: urna transição incompleta?” pp. 65–80 in Dagnino, Evelina (ed.), Anos 90: política e sociedade no Brasil. São Paulo: Brasiliense.Google Scholar
Tauk-Tornisielo, Sâmia Maria, Gobbi, Ntvar, and Fowler, Harold Gordon (eds.) (1991). Análise ambiental: urna visáo multidisciplinar. São Paulo: UNESP.Google Scholar
Viola, Eduardo (1996). “Amultidimensionalidade da globalização, as novas forças sociais transnacionais e seu impacto na política ambiental do Brasil, 1989-1995,” pp. 15–66 in Ferreira, Leila da Costa and Viola, Eduardo (eds.), Incertezas de sustentabilidade na globalização. Campinas: Editora Unicamp.Google Scholar
Viola, Eduardo (1992). “OmovimentoambientalistanoBrasil(1971-1991): dadenúncia e conscientização pública para a institucionalização e o desenvolvimento sustentável,” pp. 49–76 in Goldemberg, Miriam (ed.), Ecología, ciência e política. Rio de Janeiro: Revan.Google Scholar
Vogel, David (1993). “Representing Diffuse Interests in Environmental Policy Making,” pp. 237–271 in Rockman, Bert and Kent Weaver, R. (eds.), Do Institutions Matter: Government Capabilities in the U.S. and Abroad. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar