Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:29:11.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Political Ascent of Bolivia's Peasant Coca Leaf Producers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Kevin Healy*
Affiliation:
School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS)

Extract

During the Past Decade, Bolivia's peasant coca-leaf growers have made impressive strides in political development. This development is demonstrated by their almost mercurial ascent within the national political system, a climb which parallels the upward economic mobility of many growers. Organized through a network of unions (sindicatos), and determined to resist state policies and programs which threaten their local economies, Bolivia's peasant coca-leaf producers have learned to improve their political skills, including the building of alliances with other key political actors.

The thesis advanced here holds that not only has the peasant sindicato movement blocked attempts of the state to both reduce coca production and control coca-leaf marketing, but that those same state policies have actually strengthened the Left-of-Center labor unions and opposition political parties. Moreover, while the international war on drugs has thus far proved only minimally effective in curbing the flow of drugs from the Andean region, it has succeeded in antagonizing the sindicato organization of cocaleaf growers to the point that anti-US sentiment is widespread throughout the Bolivian countryside.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1991 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albo, X. (1984) (1987) “De MNR is a Kataristas a Katari,” pp. 379420 in Stern, Steve (ed.) Resistance, Rebellion, and Consciousness in the Andean Peasant World, 18th to 20th Centuries. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Canedo Ovellana, A. and Canelas, J. Zannieb (1983) Bolivia: Coca, Cocaine. La Paz, Bolivia: Los Amigos del Libro.Google Scholar
Centro de Documentacion e Informacion (Cedoin) (1988) El tercer congreso de la CSUTCB: Un congreso inconcluso. La Paz, Bolivia: Cedoin.Google Scholar
Centro de Documentacion, Informacion y Biblioteca (CEDIB) (1989) Realidad Nacional, Todo sobre la Coca-Cocaina-1. Cochabamba, Bolivia: CEDIB.Google Scholar
Centro de Investigacion y Desarrollo Regional (CIDRE) (1989) Unpublished figures on election data.Google Scholar
Comision de la Coca (1989) Working document of the 8th Congress of the Central Obrero Boliviano (COB), 24 September, Oruro (Bolivia).Google Scholar
Craig, R. (1987) “Illicit Drug Traffic: Implications for South American Source Countries.Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 29, 2 (Summer): 134.Google Scholar
Eje de Convergencia (1989) “21060, Las elecciones generales; perspectivas del movimiento campesino; congreso Csutcb y COB; la coca y los cocaleros; tareas.Oruro, Bolivia.Google Scholar
Healy, K. (1989) Sindicalismo, campesino y desarrollo rural. La Paz, Bolivia: Institute de Historia Social de Bolivia (HISBOL).Google Scholar
Healy, K. (1988) “Coca, the State, and the Peasantry in Bolivia, 1982-88.Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 30, 2-3 (Summer- Fall): 105126.Google Scholar
Healy, K. (1986) “The Boom within the Crisis: Some Recent Effects of Foreign Cocaine Markets on Bolivian Rural Society and Economy,” pp. 101-145 in Pacini, D. and Franquemont, C. (eds.) Coca and Cocaine, Effects on People and Policy in Latin America. Cambridge, MA: Cultural Survival, Inc.Google Scholar
Henkel, R. (1989) “The Cocaine Problem,” in Center for Latin American Studies (ed.) Bolivia after Hyperinflation, The Restructuring of the Bolivian Economy (forthcoming). Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University.Google Scholar
Hoy (1988) (June 8).Google Scholar
Iriarte, G. (1989) Analisis critico de la realidad, esquemas de interpretacion. La Paz, Bolivia: Servicio Nacional Pastoral Social/ Comision Episcopal Boliviano (SENPAS-CEB).Google Scholar
Izquierda Unida, (IU) (n.d.) “La unidad para avanzar hacia la victoria” (unpublished political declaration, mimeo). Tarija, Bolivia: IU.Google Scholar
LEE, R. (1989) The White Labyrinth: Cocaine and Political Power. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Nash, J. (1979) We Eat the Mines and the Mines Eat Us: Dependency and Exploitation in Bolivian Tin Mines. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rivera, S. (1983) Oprimidos pero no vencidos: luchas del campesinado aymara y quechua 1900-1980. La Paz, Bolivia: Instituto de Historia Social Boliviana/Confederacion Sindical Unica de Trabajadores Campesinos de Bolivia (HISBOL-CSUTCB).Google Scholar
Rodriguez, G. (1989a) “La COB, mas preguntas que respuestas.” Cuarto Intermedio 11 (May): 33-47.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, G. (1989b) “Las elecciones en el tropico Cochabamba.” Presencia (May 21): 2.Google Scholar
Tropical Research and Development, Inc. (1986) “Evaluation of Chapare Regional Development Project.Gainesville, FL: Tropical Research and Development, Inc.Google Scholar
Unidad de Analisis de Politicas Economicas (UDAPE) (1990) Estrategia Nacional del Desarrollo Alternativo (February). La Paz, Bolivia: UDAPE (Bolivian government planning unit).Google Scholar
United States. Agency for International Development (US-AID) (1986) A Review of AID's Narcotics Control Development Assistance Program. Washington, DC: AIDGoogle Scholar
World Bank (1990a) Bolivia Poverty Report (No. 86430-BO). Washington, DC- World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank (1990b) “Bolivia, Updating Economic Memorandum” (unpublished document for internal use). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar