Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:28:14.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Road to Southern Cone Economic Integration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Jeffrey Cason
Jeffrey Cason*
Affiliation:
Middlebury College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The integration process as developed in MERCOSUR has been largely a success, albeit led (and often aggravated) by Brazil. Three cases illustrate Brazil’s dominant role: the dispute over the automobile regime that began in 1995, the import-financing conflict of 1997, and the recent negotiations over the Free Trade Area of the Americas. Brazil’s behavior pattern does not threaten MERCOSUR’s stability, however, or the all-but-irreversible progress of regional integration.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , Spring 2000 , pp. 23 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almeida, Paulo Roberto 1993. O Mercosul no contexto regional e internacional. Política Externa 2, 2: 86–103.Google Scholar
APX News (wire service). 1999. Brazil, Argentina to Resume Mercosur Auto Talks Tomorrow. May 10.Google Scholar
Araújo, Júnior, deJosé, Tavares 1990. El programa de integración Argentina-Brasil y las tendencias actuales de la economía mundial. in Hirst 1990.Google Scholar
Bouzas, Roberto. 1990. La crisis de la deuda, la vulnerabilidad externa y el programa de integración y cooperación Argentina-Brazil. in Hirst 1990.Google Scholar
Brasil, Secretaria de Comércio Exterior. 1997. Balança Comercial Brasileira, Julho 1997. http:161.148.1.101bal97aspec07.htm.Google Scholar
Bresser, Pereira, Luiz, Carlos 1990. Presupuestos y obstáculos de la integración Argentina-Brazil. in Hirst 1990.Google Scholar
Business Latin America . 1993. Mercosur Presidents Push Forward. January 11.Google Scholar
Chudnovsky, Daniel, and Fernando, Porta. 1989. On Argentine-Brazilian Economic Integration. CEPAL Review 39: 115–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chudnovsky, Daniel, Andrés, López, and Fernando, Porta. 1994. Intra-Industry Trade and Regional Integration: the Case of the Auto Industry in Argentina. Unpublished ms.Google Scholar
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). 1998. Foreign Direct Investment in the Latin American Automobile Industry: Responses to Global Challenges, http:www.eclac.clenglishPublicationsinvest98fdiautos.htm.Google Scholar
Fernández, Wilson. 1991. El pensamiento brasileño acerca de la integración. Revista de Ciencias Sociales 6: 44–62.Google Scholar
Fernández, Wilson. 1992. MERCOSUR: economía, política y estrategia en la integración. Montevideo : Fundación de Cultura Universitaria.Google Scholar
Fritsch, Winston, and Alexandre, A. Tombini 1994. The MERCOSUL: An Overview. In Economic Integration in the Western Hemisphere, ed. Roberto, Bouzas and Jaime, Ros. Notre Dame : University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Gazeta Mercantil Latinoamericana (São Paulo). 1996. Brasileiros com o pé no freio. August 12–18.Google Scholar
Gazeta Mercantil Latinoamericana (São Paulo). 1997a. Mercosul sai fortalecido do encontro da Alca. May 19–25.Google Scholar
Gazeta Mercantil Latinoamericana (São Paulo). 1997b. Os passos para a criação da Alca. April 7–13.Google Scholar
Grandona, Mariano. 1996. La Argentina, provincia de Brasil. Editorial. La Nación (Buenos Aires). January 28.Google Scholar
Guilhon, Albuquerque, José, A. 1992. Mercosul: integração regional pós-guerra fria. Política Externa 1, 2: 112–21.Google Scholar
Hirst, Mónica. 1984. Política externa: a experiencia brasileira. Dados 27: 377–94.Google Scholar
Hirst, Mónica. 1996. A dimensão política do Mercosul: atores, politização e ideologia. Unpublished ms.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, Mónica, ed. 1990. Argentina-Brazil: perspectivas comparativas y ejes de integración. Buenos Aires : Editorial Tesis.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (IMF). 1992. Direction of Trade Statistics Yearbook. Washington, DC : IMF.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (IMF). 1998. Direction of Trade Statistics Yearbook. Washington, DC : IMF.Google Scholar
International Trade Reporter . 1996. Brazil-Argentina Auto Agreement Seen as Step to Large Car Industry. February 28.Google Scholar
Inter Press Service. 1994. Mercosur: Free Trade to Exclude Sugar, Auto Sectors. December 15.Google Scholar
Inter Press Service. 1997a. Integration: Argentina Toughens up on Brazil. April 21.Google Scholar
Inter Press Service. 1997b. Integration: Mercosur Credibility Bruised by Brazilian Initiative. April 2.Google Scholar
Inter Press Service. 1997c. Mercosur: Brazil Caught between Trade Deficit and Trade Partners. June 17.Google Scholar
Inter Press Service. 1997d. Mercosur: Business Dissatisfied with Temporary Solution to Crisis. April 4.Google Scholar
Inter Press Service. 1998. Mercosur Nations Sign Auto Accord. December 16.Google Scholar
Interview. 1995a. Former government minister, economic area, Brazil. Author interview. Rio de Janeiro, July 6.Google Scholar
Interview. 1995b. Official, Argentine Central Bank. Author interview. Buenos Aires, August 4.Google Scholar
Interview. 1997. Argentine business executive involved in foreign trade. Author interview. Buenos Aires, August 21.Google Scholar
Journal of Commerce . 1999. Argentine Auto Parts Sector Fears Imports from Brazil Will Mean Closures, Job Losses. February 25.Google Scholar
Lee, Naeyoung, and Jeffrey, Cason. 1994. Automobile Commodity Chains in the NICs: A Comparison of South Korea, Mexico, and Brazil. In Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism, ed. Gary, Gereffi and Miguel, Korzeniewicz. Westport : Praeger. 223–43.Google Scholar
Machado, João Bosco M., and Pedro daMotta, Veiga 1997. A Alca e a estratégia negociadora brasileira. Revista Brasileira de Comercio Exterior 51: 33–42.Google Scholar
Manzetti, Luigi. 1990. Argentine-Brazilian Economic Integration: an Early Appraisal. Latin American Research Review 25 (3: 109–40.Google Scholar
Manzetti, Luigi. 1992. Economic Integration in the Southern Cone. North-South Focus (Coral Gables). December.Google Scholar
Manzetti, Luigi. 1994. The Political Economy of Mercosur. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 35, 4 (Winter): 101–41.Google Scholar
Mark, Imogen. 1998. Mercosur Sees Its Star Rising. Financial times ( London ). April 20: 3. Retrieved from LEXIS-NEXIS.Google Scholar
MERCOSUL: Revista de Negocios . 1997. Um passo rumo a economia internacional. April.Google Scholar
Mericle, Kenneth S. 1984. The Political Economy of the Brazilian Motor Vehicle Industry. In The Political Economy of the Latin American Motor Vehicle Industry, eds. Rich, Kronish and Mericle, . Cambridge : MIT Press.Google Scholar
La Nación (Buenos Aires). 1997a. Echale la culpa a Rio. April 6.Google Scholar
La Nación (Buenos Aires). 1997b. La Argentina quiere torcer la decisión del gobierno brasileño. March 29.Google Scholar
La Nación (Buenos Aires). 1997c. Proponen diseñar políticas comunes. April 15.Google Scholar
O’Neal Taylor, Cherie. 1997. Dispute Resolution as a Catalyst for Economic Integration and an Agent for Deepening Integration: Nafta and Mercosur Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business 17, 2–3: 850–99.Google Scholar
Onuki, Janina. 1996. O governo e o empresariado argentino: a percepção política do Mercosul. Master’s, Department of Political Science, Universidade de São Paulo.Google Scholar
Peña, Felix. 1992. Pré-requisitos poléticos e económicos da integração. Política Externa 1, 2: 122–31.Google Scholar
Peña, Felix. 1995. New Approaches to Economic Integration in the Southern Cone. Washington Quarterly 18 (3): 113–22.Google Scholar
Piling, David, and Jonathan, Wheatley. 1996. Argentina and Brazil Clear the Road—Last Week’s Agreement Aims to Help Both Countries Expand their Motor Industries. Financial times ( London ). February 2: 4. Retrieved from LEXISNEXIS.Google Scholar
Reuters World Service. 1995a. Argentina Automakers Bound to Lose Their Edge. June 16.Google Scholar
Reuters World Service. 1995b. Menem Could Cancel Brazil Visit Because of Car Row. June 14.Google Scholar
Reuters World Service. 1995c. Menem Says Auto Trade Spat with Brazil Overcome. June 16.Google Scholar
Sánchez, Enrique P. 1992. The Auto Industry in Latin America: the Challenge of Adjusting to Economic Reform. Business Economics, 2: 25–30.Google Scholar
TELAM Noticias. 1995a. Brasil apunta a captar las inversiones automotrizes. June 14.Google Scholar
TELAM Noticias. 1995b. Brasil y Argentina retoman negociaciones por cupos para autos. June 22.Google Scholar
TELAM Noticias. 1995c. Cavallo confirmó que Brasil suspendió la medida por 30 días. June 15.Google Scholar
Teubal, Miguel. 1996. Mercosur, Argentina, and Regional Integration Processes. International Journal of Political Economy 26, 4: 56–70.Google Scholar
Tomassini, Luciano. 1985. The Disintegration of the Integration Process: Toward New Forms of Regional Cooperation. In Regional Integration: The Latin American Experience, ed. Altaf, Gauhar. Boulder : Westview Press.Google Scholar
Tussie, Diana. 1981. Latin American Integration: from Lafta to Laia. Journal of World Trade Law 15, 5: 399–413.Google Scholar
Washington Post. 1998. Summit Ends with Promises; Hemispheric Leaders Focus on Trade. April 20.Google Scholar
Wionczek, Miguel S. 1970. The Rise and Decline of Latin American Economic Integration. Journal of Common Market Studies 9, 1: 49–66.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1998. World Development Report. New York : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar