Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T11:48:58.245Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interest Groups in the Colombian Congress: Group Behavior in a Centralized, Patrimonial Political System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Harvey F. Kline*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01002

Extract

The use of “group” as a unit of analysis has a long tradition in political science. Some proponents of this approach (Bentley, 1908; Hagan, 1966) define group in such a broad way as to simplify the study of politics little if any. An empirically more useful approach to the study of groups is that pursued by David Truman (1955), who concentrates his attention on interest groups. Although he never states that all of the politics of the United States can be understood through the study of interest groups, it is clear that Truman considers the study of such groups to be a central aspect and, in effect, hypothesizes that such would be the case in any political system. Whether this is in fact the case can be tested by cross-national studies. In one such study, Joseph La Palombara (1960) concluded that the important aspects of Italian politics are not explained satisfactorily by studying organized interest groups. This is in direct contradiction to Truman's implicit hypothesis, which would be refuted if numerous studies in other political systems concluded as La Palombara's did.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R. N. (1970) “Political power and social structure,” pp. 1542 in C. Veliz (ed.) The Politics of Conformity in Latin America. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Acor, W. H. (1971) “The functional and dysfunctional consequences of national legislative systems for Latin America's political development.” Presented at the Sixty-Seventh Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M. S. (1962) “Two faces of power.” Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev. 56 (December): 947952.Google Scholar
Bauer, R. A., de Sola Pool, I., and Dexter, L. A. (1968) American Business and Public Policy. New York: Atherton.Google Scholar
Bentley, A. (1908) The Process of Government. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Burnett, B. G. (1970) “Chile,” pp. 435474 in B. G. Burnett and K. F. Johnson (eds.) Political Forces in Latin America. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. (1956) A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dix, R. H. (1967) Colombia: The Political Dimensions of Change. New Haven, Conn.: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Fals Borda, O. (1968) Suversión y Cambio Social. Bogotá: Ediciones Tercer Mundo.Google Scholar
Gil, F. (1966) The Political System of Chile. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Goldrich, D., Pratt, R. B., and Schuller, C. R. (1970) “The political integration of lower-class urban settlements in Chile and Peru,” pp. 175214 in I. L. Horowitz (ed.) Masses in Latin America. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Hagan, C. B. (1966) “The group in a poütical science,” pp. 3851 in R. Young (ed.) Approaches to the Study of Politics. Evanston, III.: Northwestern Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Hoskin, G., Leal, F., de Leal, M. Leon, and Kline, H. F. (forthcoming) Partidos Políticos en Colombia.Google Scholar
Hoskin, G., Leal, F., Rothlisberger, D., and Kline, H. F. (1974) El Comportamiento Legislativo en Colombia. Bogotá: Editorial Universidad de los Andes.Google Scholar
Landsberger, H. A. (1967) “The labor elite: is it revolutionary? ” pp. 256300 in S. M. Lipset and A. Solari (eds.) Elites in Latin America. London: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
la Palombara, J. (1960) “The utility and limitations of interest group theory in non-American field situations.” J. of Politics 22 (February): 2949.Google Scholar
Leal, F. (1973) Estudio del Comportamiento Legislativo en Colombia: Análisis Histórico del Desarrollo Político Nacional, 1930-1970. Bogotá: Ediciones Tercer Mundo.Google Scholar
Martz, J. D. (1962) Colombia: A Contemporary Political Survey. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Payne, J. L. (1968) Patterns of Conflict in Colombia. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Polit, G. (1968) “The Argentine industrialists,” pp. 399430 in J. Petras and M. Zeitlin (eds.) Latin America: Reform or Revolution. Greenwich, Conn.: Fawcett.Google Scholar
Powell, J. D. (1970) “Peasant society and clientelist politics.” Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev. 64 (June): 411425.Google Scholar
Ratinoff, L. (1967) “The new urban groups: the middle classes,” pp. 6193 in S. M. Lipset and A. Solari (eds.) Elites in Latin America. London: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Roett, R. (1972) Brazil: Politics in a Patrimonial Society. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Santa, E. (1964) Sociología Política de Colombia. Bogotá: Ediciones Tercer Mundo.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. (1960) The Semi-Sovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Scott, R. (1958) “Legislatures and legislation,” pp. 290332 in H. E. David (ed.) Government and Politics in Latin America. New York: Ronald.Google Scholar
Truman, D. B. (1955) The Governmental Process. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
Urrutia, M. (1969) Historia del Sindicalismo en Colombia. Bogotá: Editorial Universidad de los Andes.Google Scholar
Wiarda, H. J. (1973) “Toward a framework for the study of political change in the Iberic-Latin tradition: the corporative model.” World Politics 25 (January): 206235.Google Scholar