Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:01:51.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Incumbency and Electoral Turnover in Latin America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Robert H. Dix*
Affiliation:
Rice University

Extract

In contemporary Latin America whenever there are successive free elections turnover tends to occur at every opportunity. That is, incumbent parties or coalitions seldom win; if they do, they almost invariably show diminished electoral support compared to that of the previous election.

The frequency of incumbent defeat seems especially remarkable in view of the traditionally strong Latin American presidency. The history of some Latin American countries has been replete with continuismo (the perpetuation of a president or regime in office through manipulation of formal constitutional procedures). Even in those polities with a record of frequent adherence to constitutional norms, the president has tended to be “strong,” at least compared to other governmental institutions, such as legislatures, courts, and state or local governments. Unsatisfied with the term “presidential,” in the North American sense, Jacques Lambert calls Latin American governments “regimes of presidential dominance” (Lambert, 1967).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almond, G. and Verba, S. (1963) The Civic Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Berry, R. A., Hellman, R., and Solaun, M. (1980) Politics of Compromise. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Dibacco, T. [ed.] (1977) Presidential Power in Latin American Politics. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Dix, R. (1973) “Latin America: oppositions and development,” pp. 261303 in Dahl, R. (ed.) Regimes and Oppositions. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Fitch, J. (1977) The Military Coup d'Etat as a Political Process: Ecuador, 1948-1966. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Gillespie, J. and Nesvold, B. [eds.] (1971) Macro-Quantitative Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Guide to U.S. Elections (1975) Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Handelman, H. and Sanders, T. [eds.] (1981) Military Government and the Movement Toward Democracy in South America. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Kernell, S. (1977) “Presidential popularity and negative voting: an alternative explanation of the midterm decline of the president's party.” Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev. 71 (March): 4466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, J. (1967) Latin America: Social Structures and Political Institutions. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latin American Political Statistics (1972) Los Angeles: Latin American Center, University of California.Google Scholar
Needler, M. (1977) “The closeness of elections in Latin America.” Latin Amer. Research Rev. 12, 1: 115121.Google Scholar
Pyne, P.(1977) “Presidential caesarism in Latin America: myth or reality? a case study of the Ecuadorian executive during the presidency of José Mariá Velasco Ibarra, 1960-61.” Comparative Politics 9 (April): 281304.Google Scholar
Ritter, A. and Pollack, D. H. [eds.] (1983) Latin American Prospects for the 1980s. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Stepan, A. (1971) The Military in Politics: Changing Patterns in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, P. B. Jr. (1960) Government and Politics in Uruguay. New Orleans: Tulane Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Wiarda, H. and Kline, H. [eds.] (1979) Latin American Politics and Development. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
World Bank (1981) World Development Report 1981. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar