Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T05:08:22.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dependency and Cliency in Latin America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Mark J. Gasiorowski*
Affiliation:
Louisiana State University

Extract

Dependency Theory has become a major paradigm for understanding Latin American politics. Based on the premises that the study of politics must begin with analysis of underlying socio-economic structures, and that these structures cannot be understood without considering a country's role in the world economy, dependency theory provides a cogent analytical framework that has been upheld in numerous empirical studies. The model of politics presented by dependency theorists is a bleak one: because economic dependence polarizes society between a small class of wealthy elites and a large mass of impoverished workers and peasants, politics in dependent societies is reduced, essentially, to class struggle between these highly mismatched forces. Except under unusual circumstances, authoritarianism is the inevitable result.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agee, P. (1975) Inside the Company: CIA Diary. New York, NY: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Banks, A. (1971) Cross-Polity Time-Series Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Black, J. (1977) United States Penetration of Brazil. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Blasier, C. (1976) The Hovering Giant: US Responses to Revolutionary Change in Latin America. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Bodenheimer, S. (1971) “Dependency and Imperialism: The Roots of Latin American Underdevelopment,” pp. 155182 in Fann, K.T. and Hodges, D.C. (eds.) Readings in US Imperialism. Boston, MA: Porter Sargent Publishers, Inc. Google Scholar
Bollen, K. (1983) “World System Position, Dependency, and Democracy: The Cross-National Evidence.” American Sociological Review 48 (August): 468479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, F. and Faletto, E. (1979) Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilcote, R. (1984) Theories of Development and Underdevelopment. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Chirot, D. (1977) Social Change in the Twentieth Century. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich Inc. Google Scholar
Deutsch, K. (1961) “Social Mobilization and Political Development.” American Political Science Review 54 (September): 493507 Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. and Lemarchand, R. (eds) (1981) Political Clientelism, Patronage, and Development. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
Gunder Frank, A. (1969) Latin America: Underdevelopment or Revolution? New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Gunder Frank, A. (1967) Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (1985) International Financial Statistics. Washington, DC: IMF, October.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (1981) International Financial Statistics. Washington, DC: IMF Google Scholar
Keohane, R. (1971) “The Big Influence of Small Allies.” Foreign Policy 2 (Spring): 161182.Google Scholar
Knorr, K. (1975) The Power of Nations. New York, NY: Basic Books Inc. Google Scholar
Krasner, S. (1978) Defending the National Interest: Raw Materials, Investments, and US Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, S. (1977) “Domestic Constraints on International Economic Leverage,” pp. 160481 in Knorr, K. and Trager, E.N. (eds.) Economic Issues and National Security. Lawrence, KS: Regents Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
McKinley, R. and Little, R. (1977) “A Foreign Policy Model of US Bilateral Aid Allocation.” World Politics 30 (October): 5886.Google Scholar
Nelson, J. (1968) Aid, Influence and Foreign Policy. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Co. Inc. Google Scholar
Nettl, J. (1968) “The State as a Conceptual Variable.” World Politics 20 (July): 559592.Google Scholar
Nordlinger, E. (1981) On the Autonomy of the Democratic State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, G. (1973) Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Institute of International Studies.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (1974) Development Cooperation, 1974 Review. Paris, France: OECD.Google Scholar
Schoultz, L. (1981) Human Rights and United States Policy Toward Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, C. and Spanier, J. (1984) Patron-Client Relationships: Multilateral Crises in the Nuclear Age. New York, NY: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Skidmore, T. (1967) Politics in Brazil, 1930-1964: An Experiment in Democracy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. (1985) “Bringing the State Back in: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research,” pp. 343 in Evans, RB., Rueschemeyer, D., and Skocpol, T. (eds.) Bringing the State Back In. New York, NY: Cambridge University press.Google Scholar
Szymanski, A. (1981) The Logic Of Imperialism. New York, NY: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Thomas, C. (1984) The Rise of the Authoritarian State in Peripheral Societies. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
United Nations (UN) (1976) Statistical Yearbook 1975. New York, NY: UN.Google Scholar
United Nations (UN) (1974) Yearbook of International Trade Statistics, 1972-1973. New York, NY: UN.Google Scholar
United Nations (UN)(various years, a) Handbook of International Trade and Development Statistics. New York, NY: UN.Google Scholar
United States. Agency for International Development. (USAID) (1985) US Overseas Loans and Grants, Series of Yearly Data (Volume II): Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: US Department of State, USAID.Google Scholar