Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T07:56:40.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Democracy and the New Electoral Right in Argentina*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Edward L. Gibson*
Affiliation:
Harvard University Academy for International and Area Studies

Extract

On the evening of 14 May 1989, hours after Argentina had held its first elections for a presidential succession in 60 years, the atmosphere at the Buenos Aires headquarters of the Unión del Centro Democrático(UCEDE) was lugubrious. The electoral news flowing into the computer terminals harbingered a resounding victoiy for Carlos Menem, the Peronist presidential candidate, and a remote third place showing of 6% for Alvaro Alsogaray, the presidential candidate of the young conservative party. Even in the capital city of Buenos Aires, where the UCEDE had led in the polls for congressional elections right up to election day, it trailed in third place. Would-be congressmen wandered the headquarters floor bewildered.

Type
The Argentine Right
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Research for this essay was supported by an Aaron Diamond Dissertation Fellowship from Columbia University's Center for the Study of Human Rights, as well as a fellowship from the Organization of American States, and was conducted while the author was a visiting researcher at the Centra de Investigaciones Europe-Latinoamericanas (EURAL), in Buenos Aires. Useful criticisms on previous versions were received from Judith Swartz, Atilio Boron, Alfred Stepan, Ezequiel Gallo, Robert Kaufman, Hector Schamis, Deborah Norden, Tim Christenfeld, Victoria Murillo, Blanca Heredia, and Douglas Chalmers. Thanks from the author are also due to Oscar Giménez Peña and Lisandro Echenique for patiently explaining some of their party's many intricacies. An earlier version of this paper was published as a working paper by Columbia University's Institute of Latin American and Iberian Studies and was presented at the XVI International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, Miami (FL), 1-3 December 1989.

References

Acuña, C. (1989) “Intereses empresarios, dictadura y democracia en la Argentina actual.” Paper prepared for the XVI International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association (LASA), Miami (FL), 4-6 December.Google Scholar
Alsogaray, A. (1990) Interview with the author, Buenos Aires (Argentina), 5 June.Google Scholar
(1989) Bases liberales para un programa de gobierno (1989- 1995). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Planeta.Google Scholar
Boron, A. (1972) “El estudio de la movilización política en América Latina: la movilización electoral en Argentina y Chile.” Desarrollo Económico 46: 212-243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, A. (1988) El boom liberal. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Ediciones Astro.Google Scholar
Cadorin, A. (1988) “La alternativa de pasar de un dúo a un trio politico.” La Nacion (14 August): 9.Google Scholar
Cardoso, F.H. (1971) Ideologias de la burguesía industrial en sociedades dependientes: Argentina y Brasil. México, México: Siglo XXI Editores.Google Scholar
Centro de Estudios para la Nueva Mayoría (1989) “El Corte de Boleta en los Comicios del 14 de mayo.” Buenos Aires, Argentina: Fundación Centro de Estudios Para la Nueva Mayoria.Google Scholar
Cornblit, O. (1975) “La opción conservadora en la política argentina.” Desarrollo Ecónomico 56: 599-639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Ipola, E. (1985) “La UCD y el desafío de la democracia.” Debates 6: 34-36.Google Scholar
Ditella, T. (1986) “Esperando al mesías.” Punto de Vista 26: 43-44.Google Scholar
Ditella, T. (1971) “La búsqueda de la fórmula politica argentina.” Desarrollo Economico 42/44: 317-325.Google Scholar
Dietl, C. (1987) Interview with the author, Buenos Aires (Argentina). 24 May.Google Scholar
Consortium. [Also published in Atilio Boron, Maria do Carmo Campello de Souza, and Douglas A. Chalmers (eds.) The Right and Democracy in Latin America. Westport, CT: Praeger, forthcoming 1991].Google Scholar
Grondona, M. (1987) Bajo el imperio de las ideas morales: las causas no económicas del desarrollo económico. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Sudamericana.Google Scholar
Grondona, M. (1986) Los pensadores de la libertad: de John Locke a Robert Nozick. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Sudamericana.Google Scholar
Humor (1989) Interview with Adelina Dalesio de Viola. (May): 35.Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estadisticas y Censo (INDEC) (1984) La pobreza en la Argentina. Buenos Aires, Argentina: INDEC.Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estadisticas y Censo (INDEC)(1980) Censo Nacional. Buenos Aires, Argentina: INDEC.Google Scholar
Kvaternik, E. (1972) “¿Fórmula o fórmulas? Algo mas sobre nuestro sistema de partidos.” Desarrollo Económico 47: 613-622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(La) Nación (1988) “Elecciones esrudiantiles en la UBA.” (16 March): 8.Google Scholar
(La) Rázon (1988) “Los liberales y el ‘89.” (27 June): 1.Google Scholar
Maier, C. (1987) Changing Boundaries of the Political: Essays on the Evolving Balance between the State and Society, Public and Private in Europe. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maslaton, C. (1988) Interview with the author, Buenos Aires (Argentina), 3 September.Google Scholar
Mignone, E. (1986) Iglesia y dictadura: el papel de la iglesia a la luz de sus relaciones con el régimen militar. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Puntosur.Google Scholar
Mora Y Araujo, M. (1983) “El Ciclo Politico Argentino.” Desarrollo Economico 86: 203-230.Google Scholar
Mora Y Araujo, M. (1972) “Comentarios sobre la búsqueda de la fórmula política argentina.” Desarrollo Economico 47: 623-629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mora Y Araujo, M. and C. Jackisch (eds.) (1987) La propuesta liberal. (Buenos Aires, Argentina: Unión LiberalGoogle Scholar
Noticias (1990) “Adelina Dalesio de Viola y sus metas: Madre y Presidente.” (28 January): 80-81.Google Scholar
Nun, J. (1987) “Cambios en la estructural social de la Argentina,” pp. 117-137 in José Nun and Juan Carlos Portantiero (eds.) Ensayos sobre la transicion democrática en la Argentina. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Puntosur.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, G. (1982) El Estado Burocrático Autoritario. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Belgrano.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, G. (1979) “Tensions in the Bureaucrátic-Authoritarian State and the Question of Democracy,” pp. 285318 in David Collier (ed.) The New Authoritarianism in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Página/12 (1990a) “Escoba en mano, Alsogaray pondra orden en la UCEDE. (19June): 10.Google Scholar
Página/12 (1990b) “Para gobernar no hay como perder elecciones.” (8July): 16.Google Scholar
Página/12 (1989) “Padre.” (4 April): 1.Google Scholar
Pion-Berlin, D. (1985) “The Fall of Military Rule in Argentina: 1976- 1983” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 27, 2 (Summer): 55-76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, A. (1986) “Some Problems in the Study of the Transition to Democracy,” pp. 4763 in Guillermo O'Donnell, Philippe Schmitter, and Laurence Whitehead (eds.) Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Part Iii, Comparative Perspectives. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. (1985) “Social Democracy as a Historical Phenomenon,” pp. 7-46 in Adam Przeworski (ed.) Capitalism and Social Democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribas, A. (1988a) El retorno de Luz del Dia: liberalismo y desarrollo. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Sudamericana.Google Scholar
Ribas, A. (1988b) “El Milagro Argentino.” La Nación (3 November): 9.Google Scholar
Ribas, A. (1988c) “De buenas intenciones está pavimentado el camino del infierno.” La Nación (29 April): 9.Google Scholar
Rouquie, A. (1983) “Argentina: the Departure of the Military — end of a political cycle or just another episode?” International Affairs (London) 4: 575-586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouquie, A. (1982) “Hegemonia militar, estado y dominacion social,” pp. 11-50 in Alain Rouquie (ed.) Argentina Hoy. Mexico, Mexico: Siglo XXI Editores.Google Scholar
Rouquie, A. (1981) Poder Militar y Sociedad Politica (Vols. I and II). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Eméce Editores.Google Scholar
Sabato, J. and Schvarzer, J. (1988) “Funcionamiento de la economia y poder politico en la Argentina: trabas para la democracia,” pp. 244-279 in Jorge Sábato (ed.) La clase dominante en la Argentina moderna: formación y caracteristicas. Buenos Aires, Argentina: CISEA/Grupo Editor Latinoamericano.Google Scholar
Schvarzer, J. (1981) Expansión económica del estado subsidiario, 1976-1981. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Centro de Investigaciones Sociales sobre el Estado y la Administracion (CISEA), Ensayos y Tesis CISEA.Google Scholar
Sidicaro, R. (1985) “iEs posible la democracia en la Argentina?” pp. 271-304 in Alain Rouquie and Jorge Schvarzer (eds.) ;Como renacen las democracias? Buenos Aires, Argentina: Emece.Google Scholar
Sidicaro, R. (1982) “Poder y Crisis de la Gran Burguesia Agraria Argentina,” pp. 51-104 in Alain Rouquie (ed.) Argentina Hoy. Mexico: Siglo XXI Editores.Google Scholar
Sikkink, K. (forthcoming 1991) Ideas and Institutions: Developmentalism in Brazil and Argentina. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Somos (1989) “Revolucion Liberal y Popular.” (28 June): cover page.Google Scholar
Unión del Centro Democratico (UCEDE) (1982) Orígenes del partido y documentos iniciales relacionados a su fundación. Buenos Aires, Argentina: UCEDE.Google Scholar
Vicens, M. and Gerchunoff, P. (1989) “Gasto público, recursos publicos y financiamiento en una economia en crisis.” Buenos Aires, Argentina: Instituto Torcuato Di Telia.Google Scholar
Zanotti, G. (1986) La UCEDE y la Iglesia Catolica. Buenos Aires, Argentina: UCEDE, Centro Civico Siglo XXI/Cuadernos Liberales.Google Scholar
Zinn, R. (1989) Interview with the author, Buenos Aires (Argentina), 18 April.Google Scholar