Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T05:54:43.745Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Current Dynamics and Future Prospects of Brazil's Relations with Latin America: Toward a Pattern of Bilateral Cooperation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Wayne A. Selcher*
Affiliation:
Elizabethtown College (Pennsylvania)

Extract

Socio-Economic or General Cultural Similarities between Brazil and the rest of Latin America would seem sufficient to support similarities of interests and close cooperative relationships. Yet Brazil's Lusophone culture, the immensity of the country, the geographical distance of much of its population from Spanish American population centers, and middle and upper class fascination for things American or European led instead to a sense of separateness and distinctness which impeded serious Brazilian selfidentification, beyond rhetoric, as a Latin American nation despite its geographical location. Thus the question of how Brazil should relate to the rest of Latin America has been a topic of domestic and continental debate, with increasingly practical consequences as the South American development process continues. The recent shift toward more intense, collaborative relations, in particular, invites analysis of current trends and speculation on possible outcomes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Associãçao Brasileira de Engenharia Industrial (1982) Exportãcao de Serviços de Engenharia-Levantamento Preliminar (mimeographed). Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: Associação Brasiliera de Engenharia Industrial, May.Google Scholar
Barros, A. de S.C. (1985) “The Future of United States Brazilian Relations: Political and Security Issues and Opportunities.” Paper presented at the Seminar on the Future of United States-Brazilian Relations, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, 26 September.Google Scholar
Barros, A. de S.C. (1984) “Brazil,” pp. 7387 in J. Katz (ed.) Arms Production in Developing Countries: An Analysis of Decision Making. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Bond, R. (1981) “Brazil's Relations with the Northern Tier Countries of South America,” pp. 123141 in W Selcher (ed.) Brazil in the International System: The Rise of a Middle Power. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Cavagnari Filho, Col. G. (1984) “Brasil: Introducán ao estudo de urna potencia media.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 2713-20.Google Scholar
Fleischer, D. (1985) “Relacoes Brasil-Cuba: Urna reaproximacao delicada.” Política e Estrategia III, 3 (July-September): 513521.Google Scholar
Hirst, M. (1984a) “Democratic Transition and Foreign Policy: The Experience of Brazil,” pp. 216229 in H. Muñoz and J. Tulchin (eds.) Latin American Nations in World Politics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Hirst, M. (1984b) “Brasil-Balance y perspectivas de la política exterior brasileña.” America Latina/Internacional 1,1 (July-September): 11-16. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales (FLACSO), Programa Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Hirst, M. and Lengyel, M. (1985) “Brasil-Las relaciones con Argentina: Primeros síntomas de un acercamiento estable.” América Latina/ Internacional 2,6 (October-December): 119-122. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales (FLACSO), Programa Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Interamerian Development Bank (IDB) (1984) Economic and Social Progress in Latin America: Economic Integration. Washington, DC: IDB.Google Scholar
Interamerian Development Bank (1982) Economic and Social Progress in Latin America: The External Sector. Washington, DC: IDB.Google Scholar
Interamerian Development Bank (1975) Annual Report. Washington, DC: IDB. International Monetary Fund (IMF) (1985) Direction of Trade Statistics Yearbook. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
Moneta, C. (1983) “Las fuerzas armadasyel conflicto de las Islas Malvinas: Su importancia en la política argentina y en el marco regional.” Foro Internacional 91, Vol. 23, 3 (enero-marzo): 266286.Google Scholar
Moura, G. (1985) “Brasil: Uma nova política latinoamericana?Brasil - Perspectivas Intemacionais 7 (May-September): 25.Google Scholar
Myers, D. (1985) “Threat Perception and Strategic Response of the Regional Hegemons: A Conceptual Overview.” Paper prepared for presentation at the Northeast Political Science Association Conference, Philadelphia, PA, 1416 November.Google Scholar
O Estado de Sao Paulo (1985) 11 December: 7.Google Scholar
Payro, A. (1973) “Brasil: Otra vez gendarme de América Latina.” Cuadernos Americanos 188, 3 (May-June): 724.Google Scholar
Selcher, W. (1985) “Brazilian-Argentine Relations in the 1980s: From Wary Rivalry to Friendly Competition.” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 27, 2 (Summer): 2553.Google Scholar
Selcher, W. (1984) “Brazil's Foreign Policy: More Actors and Expanding Agendas,” pp. 101123 in J. Lincoln and E. Ferris (eds.) The Dynamics of Latin American Foreign Policies: Challenges for the 1980s. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Selcher, W. (1981) “Brazil in the World: Multipolarity as Seen by a Peripheral ADC Middle Power,” pp. 81101 in E. Ferris and J. Lincoln (eds.) Latin American Foreign Policies: Global and Regional Dimensions. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Soares De Lima, M. (1983) “As relacoes económicas e políticas do Brasil com a América Latina: Balanco de urna década.” Paper presented at the seminar entitled Oportunidades e Limites da Sociedade Periférica: O Caso do Brasil, sponsored by the Stanford-Berkeley Joint Center for Latin American Studies and trie Instituto Universitario de Pesquisas do Rio de Janeiro, Nova Friburgo, RJ, 1820 July.Google Scholar
United States Information Agency (USÍA) (1981) Gallup Sud (Montevideo) Survey Section 5. Commissioned by the USÍA and partially reported in USIA Foreign Opinion Note, 26 June.Google Scholar