Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T07:22:15.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Capitalism and Democracy: The Importance of Social Class in Historical Comparative Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Gerardo L. Munck
Gerardo L. Munck*
Affiliation:
Center for Latin American and Caribbean Studies of the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essays
Information
Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , Winter 1992 , pp. 225 - 244
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bruszt, L. and Stark, D. (1991). “Remaking the polítical Field in Hungary: From the Politics of Confrontation to the Politics of Competition.” Journal of International Affairs 45, 1: 201-45.Google Scholar
Cardoso, F.R and Faletto, E. (1979). Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Collier, R.B. and Collier, D. (1991). Shaping the polítical Arena: Critical Junctures, die Labor Movement, and tlie Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, L.; Linz, J., and Lipset, S.M. (1990). “Introduction: Comparing Experiences with Democracy,” in Linz, Diamond, and Lipset, (eds.) Politics in Developing Countries: Comparing Experiences with Democracy. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[eds] (1989). Democracy in Developing Countries (4 Vols.). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. [ed.], (1992). Parliamentary versus Presidential Government. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Linz, J. and Stepan, A. (forthcoming). “Democratic Transition and Consolidation in Southern Europe (with Reflections on Latin America and Eastern Europe),” in Diamandouros, N., Gunther, R., and Puhle, H-J. (eds.) The Politics of Democratic Consolidation in Southern Europe.Google Scholar
Lipset, S.M. (1960). polítical Man: The Social Bases of Politics. New York, NY: Doubleday/Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, S., O'Donnell, G. and Valenzuela, J.S. [eds.] (1992). Issues and Prospects of Democratic Consolidation: The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective. South Bend, IN.: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Moore, B. (1966). Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, G. and Schmitter, P. (1986). Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. (1991). Democracy and the Market: polítical and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ragin, C. (1987). The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P. (1988). The Consolidation of polítical Democracy in Southern Europe (3rd revised version). Stanford, CA: Stanford University and European University Institute.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. (1979). States and Social Revolution: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stephens, J.D. (1989). “Democratic Transition and Breakdown in Europe, 1870- 1939: A Test of the Moore Thesis.” American Journal of Sociology 94, 5: 1019-77.Google Scholar