Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:14:11.939Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing Democracy in Puebla: The Opposition Takes Charge of Municipal Government

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Walt Vanderbush
Walt Vanderbush*
Affiliation:
Miami University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Debates about democratization in developing countries have generally emphasized competitive elections, broad participation, and the protection of civil and political liberties. A survey of the first two years of PAN administration in the city of Puebla, Mexico, assesses government capacities and policy responses to social and economic demands. It suggests that excitement over the election of opposition party officials should be tempered pending evidence of the accommodation of such demands.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , Summer 1999 , pp. 1 - 27
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarado, Mendoza, Arturo. 1987. Introduction. In Electoral Patterns and Perspectives in Mexico, ed. Alvarado, Mendoza. San Diego : Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California. 1–16.Google Scholar
Bruhn, Kathleen, and Keith, Yanner. 1995. Governing under the Enemy: the Prd in Michoacán. in Rodríguez and Ward 1995 113–31.Google Scholar
Camp, Roderic Ai. 1995. The Pan's Social Bases: Implications for Leadership. in Rodríguez and Ward 1995 65–80.Google Scholar
Castillo Palma, Jaime. 1986. Los movimientos sociales en Puebla. 2 Puebla : DIAU-ICUAP.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne. 1996. Politics in Mexico. In Comparative Politics Today: A World View, 6th ed., ed. Gabriel, A. Almond and Powell, G. Bingham New York : Harper-Collins. 492–555.Google Scholar
Crespo, José Antonio. Governments of the Opposition: the Official Response. in Rodríguez and Ward 1995 17–32.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven : Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Diane E., and Viviane, Brachet-Márquez. 1997. Rethinking Democracy: Mexico in Historical Perspective. Comparative Studies of Society and History 39, 1: 86–119.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry, Juan, J. Linz, and Seymour, Martin Lipset. 1995. Introduction: What Makes for Democracy Politics in Developing Countries: Comparing Experiences with Democracy, ed. Diamond, Linz, and Lipset, Boulder : Lynne Rienner. 1–66.Google Scholar
Díaz Amador, Carmen. 1996. Puebla: política y ciudadanía. Ciudades (45–52.Google Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge I., and James, A. McCann 1996. Democratizing Mexico: Public Opinion and Electoral Choices Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Dresser, Denise. 1996: Mexico: The Decline of Dominant Party Rule. In Constructing Democratic Governance: Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean in the 1990s, ed. Jorge, I. Domínguez and Abraham, E. Lowenthal Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press. 159–84.Google Scholar
Excelsior (Mexico City). 1998. La ley estatal de federalismo hacendario, sin tintes perversos, dice Bartlett a panistas. September 4. http:www.excelsior.com.mx.Google Scholar
El Financiero (Mexico City). 1997. Reorientar el gasto en favor de municipios, exige el Pan. January 2: 14.Google Scholar
Fox, Jonathan, and Julio, Moguel. 1995. Pluralism and Anti-Poverty Policy: Mexico's National Solidarity Program and Left Opposition Municipal Governments. in Rodríguez and Ward 1995 189–204.Google Scholar
Gamarra, Eduardo A. 1996. Bolivia: Managing Democracy in the 1990s. In Constructing Democratic Governance: South America in the 1990s, ed. Jorge, I. Domínguez and Abraham, E. Lowenthal Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press. 72–98.Google Scholar
Gross, George M. 1996. Review of El federalismo mexicano (elementos para su estudio y análisis) by the Centro de Informática Legislativa del Senado de la República. Publius 26, 2 (Spring): 151–54.Google Scholar
Guevara Forsyth, Elisa. 1998. Director of Investments, State of Jalisco. Author interview. Guadalajara, June 12.Google Scholar
Hiernaux, Daniel. 1995. Globalizing Economies and Cities: A View from Mexico. In North American Cities and the Global Economy: Challenges and Opportunities, ed. Peter, Karl Kresl and Gary, Gappert. Urban Affairs Annual Review. Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage.. 112–29.Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, Dietrich, Rueschemeyer, and John, D. Stephens 1997. The Paradoxes of Contemporary Democracy: Formal, Participatory, and Social Dimensions. Comparative Politics 29, 3 (April): 323–42.Google Scholar
Jones, Gareth, and Ann, Varley. 1994. The Contest for the City Centre: Street Traders versus Buildings. Bulletin of Latin American Research 13, 1: 27–44.Google Scholar
Knight, Alan. 1990. Historical Continuities in Social Movements. In Popular Movements and Political Change in Mexico, ed. Joe, Foweraker and Ann, Craig. Boulder : Lynne Rienner. 78–102.Google Scholar
Lama Amador, Ignacio. 1996. Regidor responsible for economic development and employment. Author interview. Puebla, July 30.Google Scholar
Lama Amador, Ignacio. 1997. Author interview. Puebla, June 30.Google Scholar
Latin American Regional Reports (Andean group). 1995. Just a Local Storm in a Teacup. London : Latin American Newsletters Ltd. 7.Google Scholar
Levy, Daniel C., and Kathleen, Bruhn. 1995. Mexico: Sustained Civilian Rule Without Democracy. In Politics in Developing Countries: Comparing Experiences with Democracy, ed. Larry, Diamond, Juan, J. Linz, Boulder : Lynne Rienner 171–217.Google Scholar
Macias, González, María, Cristina 1998. Regidor, economic development, City of Guadalajara. Author interview. Guadalajara, June 10.Google Scholar
Manjarrez, Alejandro C. 1991. Puebla: el rostro olvidado. Cholula , Puebla : Imagen Pública y Corporativa.Google Scholar
Merino, Mauricio. 1992. Fuera del centro. Veracruz : Universidad Veracruzana.Google Scholar
Merino, Mauricio, ed. 1994. En busca de la democracia municipal: la partcipación ciudadana en el gobierno local mexicano. Mexico City : El Colegio de México.. 283–300.Google Scholar
Middlebrook, Kevin. 1986. Political Liberalization in an Authoritarian Regime: The Case of Mexico. In Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Latin America, ed. Guillermo, O'Donnell, Philippe, C. Schmitter, and Laurence, Whitehead. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press. 123–47.Google Scholar
Mizrahi, Yemile. 1998a. Dilemmas of the Opposition in Government: Chihuahua and Baja California. Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos 14, 1 (Winter): 151–89.Google Scholar
Mizrahi, Yemile. 1998b. Costs of Electoral Success: The Partido Acción Nacional in Mexico. In Governing Mexico: Political Parties and Elections, ed. Mónica, Serrano. London : Institute of Latin American Studies. 95–113.Google Scholar
Nickson, R. Andrew. 1995. Local Government in Latin America. Boulder : Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Nuńez, Gerardo. 1998. General Manager, Economic Promotion Bureau, City of Guadalajara. Author interview. Guadalajara, June 11.Google Scholar
Otero, Gerardo. 1996. Neoliberal Reform and Politics in Mexico: An Overview. In Neoliberalism Revisited: Economic Restructuring and Mexico's Political Future, ed. Otero., Boulder: Westview Press. 1–26.Google Scholar
Pansters, Wil. 1990. Politics and Power in Puebla: The Political History of a Mexican State, 1937–1987. Amsterdam : CEDLA.Google Scholar
Poder Ciudadano (Puebla). 1996a. En cambio avanza, a pesar de los “malosos”: Ghr [Gabriel Hinojosa Rivero, mayor of Puebla]. No. 9 (July 22–29): 1.Google Scholar
Poder Ciudadano (Puebla). 1996b. Dignificación a los ambulantes. No. 10 (August 7–14): 1, 6, 7.Google Scholar
Poder Ciudadano (Puebla). 1996c. Honestidad y eficiencia en los gobiernos de cambio. No. 12 (September 12–20): 1–2.Google Scholar
Reding, Andrew. 1996. The next Mexican Revolution. World Policy Journal 13, 3 (Fall): 61–70.Google Scholar
Regidor, Guadalajara. 1998. Confidential background interview. June 15.Google Scholar
Regidores, Puebla. 1996. Confidential background interviews. August 2, 8.Google Scholar
Regidores, Puebla. 1997. June 26.Google Scholar
Regidores, Puebla. 1998. June 18, 23.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Victoria. 1992. Mexico's Decentralization in the 1980s: Promises, Promises, Promises. In Decentralization in Latin America: An Evaluation, ed. Arthur, Morris and Stella, Lowder. Westport : Praeger. 127–43.Google Scholar
Reding, Andrew. 1995. Municipal Autonomy and the Politics of Intergovernmental Finance: Is It Different for the Opposition? in Rodríguez and Ward 1995 153–72.Google Scholar
Reding, Andrew. 1997. Decentralization in Mexico: From Reforma Municipal to Solidaridad to Nuevo Federalismo. Boulder : Westview Press.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Victoria, and Peter, Ward, eds. 1995. Opposition Government in Mexico. Albuquerque : University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Victoria 1996. The New PRI: Recasting Its Identity. In Dismantling the Mexican State ed. Rob, Aitken, Nikki, Craske, Gareth, Jones, and David, Stansfield. New York : St. Martin's Press. 92–112.Google Scholar
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, Evelyne, Huber Stephens, and John, D. Stephens 1992. Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
El Sol de Puebla . 1996a. Ambulantes poseen una vez mas los calles del centro. July 17: 1, 6.Google Scholar
El Sol de Puebla . 1996b. Hinojosa miente, su gobierno no es de puertas abiertas, acuse comerciantes. July 22: 1.Google Scholar
Tarres, María Luisa. 1990. Middle-Class Associations and Electoral Opposition. In Popular Movements and Political Change in Mexico, ed. Joe, Foweraker and Ann, Craig. Boulder : Lynne Rienner. 137–49.Google Scholar
Thomson, Guy P. C. 1989. Puebla de los Angeles: Industry and Society in a Mexican City, 1700–1850. Boulder : Westview Press.Google Scholar
El Universal (Puebla). 1997a. Ambulantes, talón de aquiles de Ghr. January 4: B-3.Google Scholar
El Universal (Puebla). 1997b. El ambulantaje no es insoluble. November 14. http:www.aguila.el-universal.com.mxpuebla.Google Scholar
El Universal (Puebla). 1998. Los panistas, “enemigos de la justicia social,” dice Bartlett. January 28. http:www.aguila.el-universal.com.mxpuebla.Google Scholar
Valdiva Romero, Eugenia. 1998. Official, State of Jalisco. Author interview. Guadalajara, June 12.Google Scholar
Vanderbush, Walt. 1997. Local Workplace Organizing in the Wake of Globalisation: Street Vendors and Autoworkers in Puebla, Mexico. Space and Polity 1, 1: 61–81.Google Scholar
Vanderbush, Walt. 1998. An Uphill Struggle to Resist Downward Harmonization in Puebla, Mexico: the Case of Volkswagen Workers. Economic Development Quarterly 12, 3 (August): 248–65.Google Scholar
Vanderbush, Walt, and Thomas, Klak. 1996. “Covering” Latin America: the Exclusive Discourses of the Summit of the Americas as Viewed through the New York Times. Third World Quarterly 17, 3: 537–56.Google Scholar
Ward, Peter M. 1995. Policy Making and Policy Implementation among Non-Pri Governments: the Pan in Ciudad Juárez and in Chihuahua. in Rodríguez and Ward 1995 135–51.Google Scholar
State of Yucatán. 1998. Yucatán: the New Business Frontier. Advertisement. In Latin Trade (Miami) September: 73.Google Scholar
Zurita García, Jaime. 1996. Secretaria de Gobernación, Puebla. Author interview. Puebla, July 31.Google Scholar