Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:25:44.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Revolution and Mexican Foreign Policy*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

James F. Engel
James F. Engel*
Affiliation:
Department of Government, University of South Dakota
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In recent years the foreign policy of Mexico has often been criticized in the United States. The reaction of Mexico to steps taken by the United States in Latin America—in Cuba, the Dominican Republic, and elsewhere—has led to statements about Mexican foreign policy that indicate little understanding of Mexican mentality, history, and approach to international problems. Of primary concern in any attempt to shed light on the foreign policy of Mexico is the place of the Mexican Revolution in shaping the nation's approach to international problems.

The Mexican Revolution has had profound effects on the development of the country. Since the beginning of the Revolution in 1910, Mexico has followed a path to political stability unique in Latin America. The Revolution and its effects on subsequent Mexican attitudes have been studied by many scholars in attempts to learn lessons for the other developing nations of the hemisphere.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Inter-American Studies , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , October 1969 , pp. 518 - 532
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This article is the result of research in progress on a book, partially supported by the Research Center at New Mexico State University, dealing with Mexican reaction to United States Cuban policy since Castro.

References

1 Cline, Howard F., “Mexico: A Maturing Democracy,” Current History, 24, no. 139 (March, 1953): 136–142 Google Scholar.

2 Quoted in: Ceniceros, José, Mexico's Attitude in Its International Relations (Mexico City: Ministry of Foreign Relations, 1935), p. 11 Google Scholar.

3 México. Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores. Dirección General de Prensa y Publicidad. Algunos aspectos de la política internacional de la Revolución (México: Tall. Graf. de la Nación, 1960), p. 7 (hereafter cited as Algunos aspectos).

4 Toledano, Vicente Lombardo, “The Labor Movement,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 208 (March, 1940), 49 CrossRefGoogle Scholar (hereafter cited as The Annals).

5 y Nufiez, Lucio Mendieta, “The Balance of Agrarian Reform,” The Annals, 208 (March, 1940), 126 Google Scholar.

6 Sáenz, Aarón, La política internacional de la Revolución (México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1961), p. 4 Google Scholar.

7 Sáenz, Moisés and Priestley, Herbert Ingram, Some Mexican Problems (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1926, p. 7.Google Scholar

8 México, , Algunos aspectos, p. 8.Google Scholar

9 Mateos, Adolfo López, Pensamiento y programa (México: Editorial la Justicia, 1961), p. 1 Google Scholar.

10 The Political Constitution of the United States of Mexico, Article 89.

11 Tucker, William Pierce, The Mexican Government Today (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1957), p. 187 Google Scholar.

12 Mateos, López, Pensamiento y programa (México: Editorial la Justicia, 1961), p. 271 Google Scholar.

13 Nervo, Padilla, “La política internacional de México expuesta por el Lie. Padilla Nervo, Secretario de Relaciones Exteriores,” Revista Internacional y Diplomática, 3, no. 27 (enero 31, 1953), 6 Google Scholar.

14 México, Algunos aspectos, pp. 15-16.

15 El Universal, September 1, 1960, p. 1.

16 Ibid., September 2, 1959, p. 1.

17 México, Algunos aspectos, p. 14.

18 Bemis, Samuel Flagg, The Latin American Policy of the United States (New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1943), p. 260 Google Scholar.

19 Beteta, Ramón, “Mexico's Foreign Relations,” The Annals, 208 (March, 1940), 173 Google Scholar.

20 The “Dulles Resolution” related to steps to be taken by the inter-American system to meet the danger of communism in the hemisphere, and called for hemispheric consultation should such a problem arise.

21 El Universal, March 13, 1954, p. 1.

22 Ibid., September 2, 1954, p. 1.

23 Ibid., March 8, 1954, p. 14, second section.

24 Castañeda, Jorge, “Pan Americanism and Regionalism: a Mexican View,” International Organization, X (1956), 383 Google Scholar. In an article on the editorial page of El Universal of March 8, 1954, Antonio Espinosa de la Monteros proclaimed a declaration of independence from the United States saying that the “gold of Wall Street” could not pervert Mexico from her goal of equality.

25 Mateos, López, Pensamiento y programa, pp. 3–4 Google Scholar.

26 México, Algunos aspectos, p. 9.

27 Mateos, López, Pensamiento y programa, p. 2.Google Scholar

28 Quintanilla, Luís, A Latín American Speaks (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1943), p. 34 Google Scholar.

29 México, , Algunos aspectos, p. 18.Google Scholar

30 Ceniceros, José Angel, Mexico's Attitude in Its Foreign Relations (Mexico City: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 1935), pp. 24–25 Google Scholar.

31 México, Algunos aspectos, p. 9.

32 Although Mexico was among the first Western Hemisphere nations to grant recognition to the Soviet Union, which it did in 1924, that recognition lasted only three years, and diplomatic relations were broken in 1927 only to be resumed during World War II. See Cline, op. cit., p. 178, and Scott, Robert E., Mexican Government in Transition (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1959), p. 100 Google Scholar.

33 Tannenbaum, Frank, Mexico: The Struggle for Peace and Bread (New York Alfred A. Knopf, 1950), p. 45 Google Scholar.