Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:37:52.052Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What is a firm? A reply to Jean-Philippe Robé

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2021

Simon Deakin ,
David Gindis Open the ORCID record for David Gindis [Opens in a new window]  and
Geoffrey M. Hodgson
Simon Deakin
Affiliation:
Faculty of Law and Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
David Gindis
Affiliation:
Hertfordshire Business School, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
Geoffrey M. Hodgson*
Affiliation:
Loughborough University London, Institute of International Management, Stratford, London, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In his recent book on Property, Power and Politics, Jean-Philippe Robé makes a strong case for the need to understand the legal foundations of modern capitalism. He also insists that it is important to distinguish between firms and corporations. We agree. But Robé criticizes our definition of firms in terms of legally recognized capacities on the grounds that it does not take the distinction seriously enough. He argues that firms are not legally recognized as such, as the law only knows corporations. This argument, which is capable of different interpretations, leads to the bizarre result that corporations are not firms. Using etymological and other evidence, we show that firms are treated as legally constituted business entities in both common parlance and legal discourse. The way the law defines firms and corporations, while the product of a discourse which is in many ways distinct from everyday language, has such profound implications for the way firms operate in practice that no institutional theory of the firm worthy of the name can afford to ignore it.

Keywords

Business corporationsfirmslegal institutionalismlegal personalitytheory of the firmB52D20K10L20
Type
Note
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 17 , Issue 5 , October 2021 , pp. 861 - 871
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Millennium Economics Ltd.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Z., Barnard, C., Deakin, S. and Fraser Butlin, S. (2021), Deakin and Morris’ Labour Law (7th. ed.), Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Adelstein, R. P. (2013), ‘Firms as Persons’, Cahiers d'économie politique, 65: 161–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnhart, R. K. (1988), Chambers Dictionary of Etymology, Edinburgh and New York: Chambers Harrap.Google Scholar
Blumberg, P. I. (1993), The Multinational Challenge to Corporation Law: The Search for a New Corporate Personality, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Braun, E. (2020), ‘Carl Menger: Contribution to the Theory of Capital (1888), Section V’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 16(4): 557–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cambridge University Press (2021), ‘Firm’, in Cambridge Dictionary, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, online at: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/firm. Retrieved 5 Feb 2021.Google Scholar
Ciepley, D. (2020), ‘The Anglo-American Misconception of Stockholders as “Owners” and “Members”: Its Origins and Consequences’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 16(5): 623–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, R. H. (1937), ‘The Nature of the Firm’, Economica, 4(16): 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, D. H. and Grossman, P. Z. (2002) ‘The Meaning of Property Rights: Law versus Economics?’ Land Economics, 78(3): August, 317–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins (2021) ‘Firm’ in Collins Dictionary, online at: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/firm. Retrieved 5 Feb 2021.Google Scholar
Deakin, S. (2003), ‘Enterprise-Risk: The Juridical Nature of the Firm Revisited’, Industrial Law Journal, 32(2): 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deakin, S. (2012a), ‘The Juridical Nature of the Firm’, in Clarke, T. and Branson, D. (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Corporate Governance, London: Sage, pp. 113–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deakin, S. (2012b), ‘The Corporation as Commons: Rethinking Property Rights, Governance and Sustainability in the Business Enterprise’, Queen's Law Journal, 37(2): 339–381.Google Scholar
Deakin, S. (2019), ‘Juridical Ontology and the Theory of the Firm’, in Gagliardi, F. and Gindis, D. (eds.), Institutions and Evolution of Capitalism: Essays in Honour of Geoffrey M. Hodgson, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deakin, S. (2020), ‘Decoding Employment Status’, King's Law Journal, 31(2): 180–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deakin, S., Gindis, D., Hodgson, G. M., Huang, K. and Pistor, K. (2017), ‘Legal Institutionalism: Capitalism and the Constitutive Role of Law’, Journal of Comparative Economics, 45(1): 188–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (2020), ‘Business Population Estimates for the UK and the Regions 2020’, London: UK Government National Statistics. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/business-population-estimates-2020. Retrieved 8 February 2021.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1970), ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Enhance its Profits’, New York Times Magazine, 13 September, 32–33, 122–126.Google Scholar
Gindis, D. (2009), ‘From Fictions and Aggregates to Real Entities in the Theory of the Firm’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 5(1): 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gindis, D. (2016), ‘Legal Personhood and the Firm: Avoiding Anthropomorphism and Equivocation’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 12(3): 499–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gindis, D. (2020a), ‘On the Origins, Meanings and Influence of Jensen and Meckling's Definition of the Firm’, Oxford Economic Papers, 72(4): 966–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gindis, D. (2020b), ‘Ernst Freund as a Precursor of the Rational Study of Corporate Law’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 16(5): 597–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greif, A. (1996), ‘The Study of Organizations and Evolving Organizational Forms Through History: Reflections from the Late Medieval Family Firm’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 5(2): 473–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, S. and Hart, O. D. (1986), ‘The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration’, Journal of Political Economy, 94(4): 691–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansmann, H. and Kraakman, R. (2000), ‘The Essential Role of Organizational Law’, Yale Law Journal, 110(3): 387–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansmann, H., Kraakman, R. R. and Squire, R. (2006), ‘Law and the Rise of the Firm’, Harvard Law Review, 119(5): 1333–1403.Google Scholar
Harris, R. (2020), Going the Distance: Eurasian Trade and the Rise of the Business Corporation, 1400-1700, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2002), ‘The Legal Nature of the Firm and the Myth of the Firm-Market Hybrid’, International Journal of the Economics of Business, 9(1): 37–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2014), ‘What is Capital? Economists and Sociologists Have Changed its Meaning – Should it be Changed Back?’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 38(5): 1063–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2015a), Conceptualizing Capitalism: Institutions, Evolution, Future, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2015b), ‘Much of the “Economics of Property Rights” Devalues Property and Legal Rights’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 11(4): 683–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2019), ‘Taxonomic Definitions in Social Science, with Firms, Markets and Institutions as Case Studies’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 15(2): 207–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmström, B. and Milgrom, P. (1994), ‘The Firm as an Incentive System’, American Economic Review, 84(4): 972–991.Google Scholar
Honoré, A. M. (2013), ‘Ownership’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 9(2): 227–255, (originally published as: ‘Ownership’, in A.G. Guest (ed.) Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961).Google Scholar
Ireland, P. W. (1999), ‘Company Law and the Myth of Shareholder Ownership’, Modern Law Review, 62(1): 32–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H. (1976), ‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure’, Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraakman, R. R. (2001), ‘The Durability of the Corporate Form’, in DiMaggio, P. (ed.), The Twenty-First-Century Firm: Changing Economic Organization in International Perspective, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 147–160.Google Scholar
Langlois, R. N., Yu, T. F.-L. and Robertson, P. L. (eds) (2002), Alternative Theories of the Firm, 3 Vols, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Machlup, F. (1967), ‘Theories of the Firm: Marginalist, Behavioral, Managerial’, American Economic Review, 57(1): 1–33.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. (1920), Principles of Economics: An Introductory Volume (8th edn.), London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ménard, C. (2014), ‘Embedding Organizational Arrangements: Toward a General Model’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 10(4): 567–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ménard, C. (2021), ‘Hybrids: Where Are We?’, Journal of Institutional Economics, published online, doi:10.1017/S1744137421000230/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menger, C. (1888), ‘Zur Theorie des Kapitals’, Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 17: 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merriam-Webster (2021), ‘Firm’, in Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, online at: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/firm. Retrieved 5 Feb 2021.Google Scholar
OECD (2017), Entrepreneurship at a Glance 2017, Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Pistor, K. (2019), The Code of Capital: How the Law Creates Wealth and Inequality, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1962), ‘The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory’, Minerva, 1(1): 54–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robé, J.-P. (2011), ‘The Legal Structure of the Firm’, Accounting, Economics and Law, 1(1): 1–86.Google Scholar
Robé, J.-P. (2012), ‘Being Done with Milton Friedman’, Accounting, Economics and Law, 2(2): 1–33.Google Scholar
Robé, J.-P. (2020), Property, Power and Politics: Why We Need to Rethink the World Power System, Bristol: Bristol University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, R. (1950), Definition, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Samuels, W. J. (2007), The Legal-Economic Nexus, New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, P. J. (2017), ‘The Corporation in History’, in Baars, G. and Spicer, A. (eds.), The Corporation: A Critical, Multi-Disciplinary Handbook, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stout, L. A. (2012), The Shareholder Value Myth: How Putting Shareholders First Harms Investors, Corporations and the Public, San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting, London and New York: Free Press and Macmillan.Google Scholar