Hostname: page-component-599cfd5f84-cdgjw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T06:46:34.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studying institutions in the context of natural selection: limits or opportunities?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2013

PASCAL BOYER  and
MICHAEL BANG PETERSEN
PASCAL BOYER*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO 63130, USA
MICHAEL BANG PETERSEN*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
*
*Email: [email protected]
**Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

In this comment, we respond to comments raised by Eastwood (2012) in response to our article on the role of evolutionary psychology in understanding institutions (Boyer and Petersen, 2012). We discuss how evolutionary psychological models account for cultural variation and change in institutions, how sociological institutionalism and evolutionary models can inform each other, how evolutionary psychological models illuminate the role of power in institutional design and the possibility of a ‘general theory’ of institutions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , June 2013 , pp. 187 - 198
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alesina, A. and Glaeser, E. L. (2004), Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe: A World of Difference, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. R. (1983), Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Boehm, C. (1999), Hierarchy in the Forest: The Evolution of Egalitarian Behavior, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, P. (2001), Religion Explained: Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Boyer, P. and Petersen, M. B. (2012), ‘The Naturalness of (Many) Social Institutions: Evolved Cognition as their Foundation’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 8 (1): 1–25.Google Scholar
Brown, D. E. (1991), Human Universals, New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Charness, G., Rigotti, L., and Rustichini, A. (2007), ‘Individual Behavior and Group Membership’, American Economic Review, 97 (4): 1340–1352.Google Scholar
Christie, N. (2004), A Suitable Amount of Crime, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. (1994), ‘Beyond Intuition and Instinct Blindness: Toward an Evolutionarily Rigorous Cognitive Science’, Cognition, 50 (1–3): 41–77.Google Scholar
Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. (1995), ‘From Evolution to Adaptations to Behavior: Toward an Integrated Evolutionary Psychology’, in Wong, R. (ed.), Biological Perspectives on Motivated Activities, Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing, pp. 11–74.Google Scholar
Daly, M. and Wilson, M. (1998), The Truth About Cinderella: A Darwinian View of Parental Love, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. and Powell, W. W. (1983), ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields’, American Sociological Review, 48 (2): 147–160.Google Scholar
Dubreuil, B. (2010), Human Evolution and the Origins of Hierarchies: The State of Nature, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1996), Grooming, Gossip, and the Evolution of Language, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (2003), ‘Evolution of the Social Brain’, Science, 302 (5648): 1160–1161.Google Scholar
Eastwood, J. (2012), ‘Reflections on the Implications of Evolutionary Psychology for the Theory of Institutions’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 8 (4): 537–550.Google Scholar
Fessler, D. M. T., Holbrook, C., and Snyder, J. K. (2012), ‘Weapons Make the Man (Larger): Formidability is Represented as Size and Strength in Humans’, PLoS One, 7 (4): e32751.Google Scholar
Garland, D. (1990), Punishment and Modern Society: A Study in Social Theory, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. (1983), Nations and Nationalism, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gilens, M. (1999), Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goette, L., Huffmann, D., and Meier, S. (2006), ‘The Impact of Group Membership on Cooperation and Norm Enforcement: Evidence using Random Assignment to Real Social Groups’, American Economic Review (Papers & Proceedings), 96 (2): 212–216.Google Scholar
Gudeman, S. (1986), Economics as Culture: Models and Metaphors of Livelihood, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (1999), Evolution and Institutions: On Evolutionary Economics and the Evolution of Economics, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Kelly, R. L. (1995), The Foraging Spectrum: Diversity in Hunter-Gatherer Lifeways, Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Knight, J. (1995), ‘Models, Interpretations and Theories: Constructing Explanations of Institutional Emergence and Change’, in Knight, J. and Sened, I. (eds.), Explaining Social Institutions, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 95–120.Google Scholar
Kurzban, R., Neuberg, S., and Buss, D. M. (2005), ‘Managing Ingroup and Outgroup Relationships’, in Buss, D. M. (ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley, pp. 653–675.Google Scholar
Maryanski, A. and Turner, J. H. (1992), The Social Cage: Human Nature and the Evolution of Society, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, P. and Kesteren, J. van (2002), ‘Cross-National Attitudes to Punishment’, in Roberts, J. and Hough, M. (eds.), Changing Attitudes to Punishment, Portland, OR: Willan Publishing, pp. 63–92.Google Scholar
Medina, L. F. (2007), A Unified Theory of Collective Action and Social Change, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Munro, D. J. (1971), The Concept of Man in Contemporary China, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E. and Cohen, D. (1996), Culture of Honor: The Psychology of Violence in the South, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
North, D. C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance, Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, M. (1965), The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Petersen, M. B. (2012), ‘Social Welfare as Small-Scale Help: Evolutionary Psychology and the Deservingness Heuristic’, American Journal of Political Science, 56 (1): 1–16.Google Scholar
Petersen, M. B., Sell, A., Tooby, J., and Cosmides, L. (2010), Evolutionary Psychology and Criminal Justice: A Recalibrational Theory of Punishment and Reconciliation. In Human Morality and Sociality: Evolutionary & Comparative Perspectives, Høgh-Olesen, Henrik (ed.) (pp. 72–131), Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Petersen, M. B., Sznycer, D., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. (2012), ‘Who Deserves Help? Evolutionary Psychology, Social Emotions, and Public Opinion about Welfare’, Political Psychology, 33 (3): 395–418.Google Scholar
Posner, R. A. (2001), ‘A Theory of Primitive Society, with Special Reference to Law’, in Parisi, F. (ed.), The Collected Essays of Richard A. Posner. Volume 2. The Economics of Private Law, Northampton, MA: Elgar, pp. 3–55.Google Scholar
Richerson, P. J. and Boyd, R. (2006), Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sell, A., Tooby, J., and Cosmides, L. (2009), ‘Formidability and the Logic of Human Anger’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106 (35): 15073–15078.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, A. D. (1987), The Ethnic Origins of Nations, Oxford (UK) and New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Spierenburg, P. (1984), The Spectacle of Suffering, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sznycer, D., Takemura, K., Delton, A. W., Sato, K., Robertson, T. E., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. (2012), ‘Cross-Cultural Differences and Similarities in Proneness to Shame: An Adaptationist and Ecological Approach’, Evolutionary Psychology, 10 (2): 352–370.Google Scholar
Tooby, J. and Cosmides, L. (1992), ‘The Psychological Foundations of Culture’, in Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. (eds.), The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 19–136.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. and Daly, M. (1992), ‘The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Chattel’, in Barkow, J. H. and Cosmides, L. (eds.), The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, London: Oxford University Press, pp. 289–322.Google Scholar
Yamagishi, T. and Yamagishi, M. (1994), ‘Trust and Commitment in the United States and Japan’, Motivation and Emotion, 18 (2): 129–166.Google Scholar