Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-20T21:46:23.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The rise, decline and rise of incomes policies in the US during the post-war era: an institutional-analytical explanation of inflation and the functional distribution of income

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2007

MARK SETTERFIELD
MARK SETTERFIELD*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Trinity College, Hartford, CT and Associate Member Cambridge Centre for Economic and Public Policy, Cambridge University. Email: [email protected]
*
*Correspondence to: Mark Setterfield, Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, Trinity College, Hartford, CT 06106, USA. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

This paper is based on the premise that at any point in time, macroeconomic performance is best understood in terms of certain ‘fundamental’ features of the income-generating process that are embedded in a relatively enduring institutional framework, that both affects and is affected by macroeconomic outcomes themselves. This results in the evolution of capitalist economies through a succession of discrete, medium-term episodes of macroeconomic performance. The purpose of the paper is to apply this vision to the explanation of inflation and the functional distribution of income in the post-war US economy. A conflicting claims model of inflation is developed, in which inflation is the result of conflict over the functional distribution of income. It is then shown how an account of the different, relatively enduring institutions within which this ‘fundamental’ macroeconomic process has been embedded over the past 50 years can be used to calibrate the analytical model, giving rise to an explanation of inflation and the functional distribution of income in the US as having evolved through three discrete episodes. Moreover, once the institutional context of macroeconomic performance is properly recognized in this manner, inflation and the functional distribution of income in the US over the past 50 years are seen to be explained by the rise, decline, and rise of successive incomes policies.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , August 2007 , pp. 127 - 146
Copyright
Copyright © The JOIE Foundation 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akerlof, G. 2002, ‘Behavioral macroeconomics and macroeconomic behavior’, American Economic Review, 92: 411–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, R. N., Beck, J., and Kruger, D. H. 1996, Labor Law, Industrial Relations and Employee Choice, Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.Google Scholar
Blueston, B. and Harrison, B. 1982, The Deindustrialization of America: Plant Closings, Community Abandonment, and the Dismantling of Basic Industry, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bowles, S., Gordon, D. M., and Weisskopf, T. E. 1990, After the Waste Land, Armonk, NY: T. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Boyer, R. 1990, The Regulation School: A Critical Introduction, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, K. 2000, ‘Uneasy terrain: the impact of capital mobility on workers, wages and union organizing’, Report to the US Trade Deficit Review Commission.Google Scholar
Burdekin, R. C. K. and Burkett, P. 1996, Distributional Conflict and Inflation: Theoretical and Historical Perspectives, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chick, V. and Caserta, M. 1997, ‘Provisional equilibrium and macroeconomic theory’, in Arestis, P., Palma, G., and Sawyer, M. (eds), Markets, Unemployment and Economic Policy: Essays in Honour of Geoff Harcourt, Vol. II, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Clarida, R., Gali, J., and Gertler, M. 1999, ‘The science of monetary policy: a new Keynesian perspective’, Journal of Economic Literature, 37: 1661–1707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarida, R., Gali, J., and Gertler, M. 2000, ‘Monetary policy rules and macroeconomic stability: evidence and some theory’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115: 147–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornwall, J. 1990, The Theory of Economic Breakdown: An Institutional-Analytical Approach, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cornwall, J. and Cornwall, W. 2001, Capitalist Development in the Twentieth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crandall, R. W. 1993, Manufacturing on the Move, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Crotty, J. 1994, ‘Are Keynesian uncertainty and macrotheory compatible? Conventional decision making, institutional structures and conditional stability in Keynesian macromodels’, in Dymski, G. and Pollin, R. (eds), New Perspectives in Monetary Macroeconomics, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Collard, F. and Dellas, H. 2004, ‘The great inflation of the 1970s’, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System International Finance Discussion Paper No. 799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreher, A. and Gaston, N. 2005, ‘Has globalisation really had no effect on unions?’ Swiss Institute for Business Cycle Research, Working Paper No. 110Google Scholar
Dutt, A. K. 1994, ‘Analytical political economy: an introduction’, in Dutt, A. K. (ed.), New Directions in Analytical Political Economy, Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Epstein, G. and Schor, J. 1990, ‘Macropolicy in the rise and fall of the Golden Age’, in Marglin, S. A. and Schor, J. B. (eds), The Golden Age of Capitalism: Reinterpreting the Post War Experience, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Glyn, A. A.Hughes, A. Lipietz, and Singh, A. 1990, ‘The rise and fall of the Golden Age’, in Marglin, S. A. and Schor, J. B. (eds), The Golden Age of Capitalism: Reinterpreting the Post War Experience, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hunt, A. 2002, ‘Incomes policy’, in Snowdon, B. and Vane, H. R. (eds), An Encyclopedia of Macroeconomics, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. J. L. Knetsch, and Thaler, R. 1986, ‘Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: entitlements in the market’, American Economic Review, 76: 728–741.Google Scholar
Kalecki, M. 1971, ‘Costs and prices’, in Selected Essays on the Dynamics of the Capitalist Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kotz, D. M., McDonough, T., and Reich, M. (eds), 1994, Social Structures of Accumulation: The Political Economy of Growth and Crisis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kregel, J. 1976, ‘Economic methodology in the face of uncertainty’, Economic Journal, 86: 209–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavoie, M. 1992, Foundations of Post-Keynesian Economic Analysis, Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Lee, F. 1998, Post-Keynesian Pricing Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maddison, A. 1991, Dynamic Forces in Capitalist Development: A Long-Run Comparative View, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marglin, S. A and Schor, J. B. (eds) 1990, The Golden Age of Capitalism: Reinterpreting the Post War Experience, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Orphanides, A. and Williams, J. C. 2004, ‘The decline of activist stabilization policy: natural rate misperceptions, learning and expectations’, European Central Bank Working Paper No. 337.Google Scholar
Osterman, P. 1999, Securing Prosperity: The American Labor Market: How It Has Changed and What to Do about It, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palley, T. I. 1998, Plenty of Nothing: The Downsizing of the American Dream and the Case for Structural Keynesianism, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palley, T. I. (2006), ‘A Post Keynesian framework for monetary policy: why interest rate operating procedures are not enough’, in Rochon, L. P. and Gnos, C. (eds), Economic Policies: Perspectives from the Keynesian Heterodoxy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Setterfield, M. 1997, ‘Should economists dispense with the notion of equilibrium?’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 20: 47–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Setterfield, M. 2003, ‘Critical realism and formal modelling: incompatible bedfellows?’, in Downward, P. (ed.), Applied Economics and the Critical Realist Critique, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Setterfield, M. 2005, ‘Interactions in analytical political economy: an introduction’, in Setterfield, M. (ed.), Interactions in Analytical Political Economy: Theory, Policy and Applications, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Setterfield, M. and Cornwall, J. 2002, ‘A neo-Kaldorian perspective on the rise and decline of the Golden Age’, in Setterfield, M. A. (ed.), The Economics of Demand-Led Growth: Challenging the Supply Side Vision of the Long Run, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Setterfield, M. and Lovejoy, T. 2006, ‘Aspirations, bargaining power and macroeconomic performance’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 29: 117--148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L. 2004, Reconstructing Macroeconomics: Structuralist Proposals and Critiques of the Mainstream, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar