Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:28:57.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nasir ad-Din Tusi on social cooperation and the division of labor: Fragment from The Nasirean Ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2008

GUANG-ZHEN SUN*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia

Extract

Nasir ad-Din Tusi's (born 1201 in Tus in northeastern Persia; died 1274 in Baghdad), has been far more influential for his various contributions to astronomy and mathematics, including founding the Maraghah observatory (in Iranian Azerbaijan) and his brilliant reformulations of the Ptolemaic planetary model, which served as an important inspiration for Nicolaus Copernicus (1473–1543) revolutionary work than for anything else. Nonetheless, he also stands as one major figure in the medieval Islamic philosophical ethics and a profound thinker on socio-economic matters, as is attested by his masterpiece Akhlāq-i Nāsirī (The Nasirean Ethics – titled after his first name), from which the following Fragment is taken. He may be deservingly credited as an important pioneer of the science of political economy.

Type
Fragment
Copyright
Copyright © The JOIE Foundation 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Essid, M. Yassine (1987), ‘Islamic Economic Thought’, in Lowry, S. Todd (ed.), Pre-Classical Economic Thought: from the Greeks to the Scottish Enlightenment, Boston: Kluwer, pp. 77102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghazanfar, Shaikh M. (2003), Medieval Islamic Economic Thought: Filling the ‘Great Gap’ in European Economics, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ghazanfar, Shaikh M. and Azim Islahi, A. (1990), ‘Economic Thought of an Arab Scholastic: Abu Hamid al-Ghazali (1058–1111)’, History of Political Economy, 22: 381403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hitti, Philip K. (2002), History of the Arabs, 10th edition, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosseini, Hamid S. (1998), ‘Seeking the Roots of Adam Smith's Division of Labor in Medieval Persia’, History of Political Economy, 30: 653681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosseini, Hamid S. (2003), ‘Contributions of Medieval Muslim Scholars to the History of Economics and Their Impact: A Refutation of the Schumpeterian Great Gap’, in Samules, Warren, Biddle, Jeff, and Davis, John (eds), Blackwell's Companion to The History of Economic Thought, Blackwell, pp. 2845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landreth, Harry and Colander, David C. (2001), History of Economic Thought, 4th edition, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Lowry, S. Todd (2003), ‘Forward’, in Ghazanfar (2003), pp. xi–xiii.Google Scholar
Saliba, George (2002), ‘Greek Astronomy and the Medieval Arabic Tradition’, American Scientist, 90 (4): 360367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1954/1994), History of Economic Analysis, New York: OxfordUniversity Press.Google Scholar
Siddiqi, Bakhtyar Husain (1963), ‘Nasir al-Din Tusi’, in Sharif, M. M. (ed.), A History of Muslim Philosophy, Wiesbaden, Germany: Otto Harrassowitz, pp. 564580.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam (1776/1950), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, edited by Cannan, Edwin, 6th Edition, London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Sun, Guang-Zhen (2005) (Ed. with Introduction), Readings in the Economics of the Division of Labor, New Jersey and Singapore: The World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Guang-Zhen forthcoming, The Economics of the Division of Labor: A History, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tusi, Nasir al-Din (1964), Akhlaq-i Nasiri (The Nasirean Ethics), Translated by Wickens, G. M., London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Walzer, R. (1960), ‘Philosophical ethics’, in Gibb, H. A. R. et al. . (eds), The Encyclopaedia of Islam, London: Luzac & Co., pp. 327329.Google Scholar
Wickens, G. M. (1964), ‘Translator's Introduction’, in Tusi (1964), pp. 9–22.Google Scholar