Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:19:19.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measuring institutions: how to be precise though vague

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2012

MARY M. SHIRLEY*
Affiliation:
The Ronald Coase Institute, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, USA

Abstract:

In his article on measuring institutions, Stephan Voigt (2012) proposes a pragmatic approach to develop more concrete, objective institutional variables than the broad abstractions used in most cross-country growth regressions. Voigt's approach has important strengths, but cross-country growth regressions, even with precisely measured institutions, are less likely to yield new insights than other methodologies.

Type
Comment
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Feld, L. P. and Voigt, S. (2003), ‘Economic Growth and Judicial Independence’, CSifo Working Paper No. 906.Google Scholar
Glaeser, G., Edward, R. L. P., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., and Shleifer, A. (2004), ‘Do Institutions Cause Growth?’,Journal of Economic Growth, 9 (3): 271303.Google Scholar
Knack, S. and Keefer, P. (1995), ‘Institutions and Economic Performance: Cross-Country Tests Using Alternative Institutional Measures’, Economics and Politics, 7 (3): 207228.Google Scholar
North, D. C., Wallis, J. J., and Weingast, B. R. (2009), Violence and Social Order: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shirley, M. (2008), Institutions and Development, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voigt, S. (2012), ‘How (Not) to Measure Institutions’, Journal of Institutional Economics, doi:10.1017/S1744137412000148.Google Scholar