Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T03:34:08.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Learning the law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2008

CHRISTOPH ENGEL
CHRISTOPH ENGEL*
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn, Germany
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the population, the knowledge of the law is at best fragmentary. It takes law students years to handle the law properly. How is the law nonetheless able to govern people's lives? To find an explanation, this paper draws on neurobiology, developmental psychology, and the psychology of learning.

Typically, the law reaches its addressees indirectly. The law is not followed, it is learned. There are two learning objects. In childhood, individuals acquire normative proficiency, i.e. the ability to handle normative expectations. This procedural knowledge is gradually filled with the declarative knowledge of individual normative expectations of legal origin.

If the law changes, through secondary learning, individuals must acquire new normative expectations. To that end, some intermediary must translate the new rule into a more contextualized social mirror rule. If changes are fundamental, as after the fall of the iron curtain, individuals must also learn new ways to handle normative expectations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , December 2008 , pp. 275 - 297
Copyright
Copyright © The JOIE Foundation 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, M. D. (2000), ‘Expressive Theories of Law: A Skeptical Overview’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 148: 1363–1501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E. and Pildes, R. H. (2000), ‘Expressive Theories of Law: A General Restatement’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 148: 1503–1575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. R. (2000), Learning and Memory: An Integrated Approach, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., and Lebiere, C. (2004), ‘An Integrated Theory of the Mind’, Psychological Review, 111: 1036–1060.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Astington, J. W. and Olson, D. R. (1995), ‘The Cognitive Revolution in Children's Understanding of Mind’, Human Development, 38: 179–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubert, V. (1969), Sociology of Law: Selected Readings, Baltimore: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1977), Social Learning Theory, Englewood Cliffs: Prenctice Hall.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1986), Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. and Walters, R. H. (1963), Social Learning and Personality Development, New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. (1992), The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, F. C. (1932), Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boyle, J. (1997), ‘Foucault in Cyberspace. Surveillance, Sovereignty, and Hardwired Censors’, University of Cincinnati Law Review, 66: 177–205.Google Scholar
Brehm, S. S. and Brehm, J. W. (1981), Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Carpendale, J. and Lewis, C. (2004), ‘Constructing an Understanding of Mind: The Development of Children's Social Understanding within Social Interaction’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27: 79–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Centner, T. J. (1997), ‘Reforming Outdated Fence Law Provisions: Good Fences Make Good Neighbors Only if They Are Fair’, Journal of Environmental Law and Litigation, 12: 267–304.Google Scholar
Chapman, M. (1988), Constructive Evolution: Origins and Development of Piaget's Thought, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coase, R. (1960), ‘The Problem of Social Cost’, Journal of Law and Economics, 3: 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooter, R. (1998), ‘Expressive Law and Economics’, Journal of Legal Studies, 27: 585–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diekmann, A. (1980), Die Befolgung von Gesetzen. Empirische Untersuchungen zu einer rechtssoziologischen Theorie, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. (1998), ‘The New Institutionalisms. Avenues of Collaboration’, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 154: 696–705.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. and Powell, W. W. (1991), ‘Introduction’, in Powell, Walter W. und DiMaggio, Paul J. (eds), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–38.Google Scholar
Domjan, M. (1998), The Principles of Learning and Behavior, Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Pub.Google Scholar
Eckensberger, L. H. and Breit, H. (1997), ‘Recht und Moral im Kontext von Kohlbergs Theorie der Entwicklung moralischer Urteile und ihrer handlungstheoretischen Rekonstruktion’, in Lampe, Ernst-Joachim (eds), Zur Entwicklung von Rechtsbewußtsein, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 253–340.Google Scholar
Ellickson, R. C. (1986), ‘Of Coase and Cattle: Dispute Resolution among Neighbours in Shasta County’, Stanford Law Review, 38: 623–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellickson, R. C. (1991), Order without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, R. A. (1995), Simple Rules for a Complex World, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, R. A. (2006), ‘Intuition, Custom, and Protocol: How to Make Sound Decisions with Limited Knowledge’, New York University Journal of Law and Liberty, 2: 1–27.Google Scholar
Feeley, M. (1970), ‘Coercion and Compliance: A New Look at an Old Problem’, Law and Society Review, 4: 505–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanagan, P. M. (2003), ‘Trespass-Zoning: Ensuring Neighborhoods a Safer Future by Excluding those with a Criminal Past’, Notre Dame Law Review, 79: 327–387.Google Scholar
Friedman, L. M. (1975), The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective, New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Glimcher, P. W. (2003), Decisions, Uncertainty, and the Brain: The Science of Neuroeconomics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P. and Taylor, R. C. R. (1996), ‘Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms’, Political Studies, 44: 936–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammer, J. and Keller, H. (1997), ‘Überlegungen zur Entstehung des Rechtsempfindens aus entwicklungs-psychobiologischer Sicht’, in Lampe, Ernst-Joachim (ed.), Zur Entwicklung von Rechtsbewußtsein, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 152–181.Google Scholar
Hebb, D. O. (1949), The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Heyes, C. (2001), ‘Causes and Consequences of Imitation’, Trends in Cognitive Science, 5: 253–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirsch, E. E. (1982), ‘Die Steuerung des menschlichen Verhaltens’, Juristenzeitung: 41–47.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (1988), Economics and Institutions: A Manifesto for a Modern Institutional Economics, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2006), ‘What Are Institutions?’, Journal of Economic Issues, 40: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2007), On the Institutional Foundations of Law: The Insufficiency of Custom and Private Ordering.Google Scholar
Hogan, R. and Henley, N. (1970), ‘Nomotics: The Science of Human Rule Systems’, Law and Society Review, 5: 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Immergut, E. M. (1998), ‘The Theoretical Core of the New Institutionalism’, Politics and Society, 26: 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jhering, R. v. (1884), ‘Über die Entstehung des Rechtsgefühls’, Österreichische Juristenzeitung, 7: 121.Google Scholar
Jhering, R. v. (1904), Der Zweck im Recht, Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel.Google Scholar
Jones, H. W. (1969), The Efficacy of Law, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, L. (1981), The Meaning and Measurement of Moral Development, Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.Google Scholar
Kornhauser, L. A. (2000), ‘Three Roles for a Theory of Behaviour in a Theory of Law’, Rechtstheorie, 31: 197–252.Google Scholar
Korobkin, R. B. and Ulen, T. S. (2000), ‘Law and Behavioral Science. Removing the Rationality Assumption from Law and Economics’, California Law Review, 88: 1051–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreppner, K. (1997), ‘Einfluss von Familienkommunikation auf das Entstehen von Vorläufern des Rechtsempfindens bei Kleinstkindern’, in Lampe, Ernst-Joachim (ed.), Zur Entwicklung von Rechtsbewußtsein, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 341–370.Google Scholar
Landa, J. T. (1998), Trust, Ethnicity, and Identity: Beyond the New Institutional Economics of Ethnic Trading Networks, Contract Law, and Gift-Exchange, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lessig, L. (1999), Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Loader, L. (1992), ‘Trespass to Property: Shopping Centers’, Journal of Law and Social Policy, 8: 254–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lüdemann, J. (2004), Edukatorisches Staatshandeln, Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1969), Legitimation durch Verfahren, Neuwied am Rhein: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
Mayntz, R. (1984), ‘Durchsetzung und Wirksamkeit des Rechts’, in Irle, Martin (ed.), Die Durchsetzung des Rechts, Mannheim: Bibliographisches Institut, pp. 9–22.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1934), Mind, Self and Society From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist, Chicago.Google Scholar
Messick, D. M. and Brewer, M. B. (1983), ‘Solving Social Dilemmas: A Review’, Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 4.Google Scholar
Milgram, S. (1974), Obedience to Authority, New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Miller, N. E. and Dollard, J. (1941), Social Learning and Imitation, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Newcomb, T. M. (1943), Personality and Social Change, New York: Dryden.Google Scholar
North, D. C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. C. (2005), Understanding the Process of Economic Change, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opp, K.-D. (1971), ‘Einige Bedingungen für die Befolgung von Gesetzen’, Kriminologisches Journal, 1: 1–25.Google Scholar
Palmer, T. L. (1992), ‘Determining Liability of Ranchers and Farmers for Injuries Caused by Fencing or not Fencing Rangelands’, Journal of Agricultural Taxation and Law, 14: 25–37.Google Scholar
Pavlov, I. P. and Anrep, G. V. (1927), Conditioned Reflexes: An Investigation of the Physiological Activity of the Cerebral Cortex, London: Oxford University Press/Humphrey Milford.Google Scholar
Peters, B. G. (1999), Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism, London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. and Gabain, M. (1932), The Moral Judgment of the Child, London: Trubner.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1958), Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Powell, W. W. and DiMaggio, P. (1991), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rachlinski, J. J. (2003), ‘The Uncertain Psychological Case for Paternalism’, Northwestern University Law Review, 97: 1165–1225.Google Scholar
Rehbinder, M. (1983), ‘Fragen des Rechtswissenschaftlers an die Nachbarwissenschaften zum sog. Rechtsgefühl’, in Gruter, Margaret und Rehbinder, Manfred (eds), Der Beitrag der Biologie zu Fragen von Recht und Ethik, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 261–274.Google Scholar
Reidenberg, J. (1996), ‘Governing Networks and Rule-Making in Cyberspace’, Emory Law Journal, 45: 911–930.Google Scholar
Reidenberg, J. (1998), ‘Lex Informatica: The Formulation of Information Policy Rules Through Technology’, Texas Law Review, 76: 553–593.Google Scholar
Rutherford, M. (1994), Institutions in Economics: The Old and the New Institutionalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, T. C. (1960), The Strategy of Conflict, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schlicht, E. (1998), On Custom in the Economy, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selman, R. L. (1984), Die Entwicklung des sozialen Verstehens: Entwicklungspsychologische und klinische Untersuchungen, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1957), Models of Man: Social and Rational. Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Society Setting, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Singer, W. (1991), ‘Die Entwicklung kognitiver Strukturen – ein selbstreferentieller Lernprozess’, in Schmidt, Siegfried J. (ed.), Gedächtnis: Probleme und Perspektiven der interdisziplinären Gedächtnisforschung, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 96–126.Google Scholar
Singer, W. (1999), ‘Neuronal Synchrony: A Versatile Code for the Definition of Relations?’, Neuron, 24: 49–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, W. (2001), ‘Was kann ein Mensch wann lernen?’, Universitas, 56: 880–892 and 1011–1019.Google Scholar
Singer, W. (2003), ‘Hirnentwicklung – neuronale Plastizität – Lernen’, in Klinke, Rainer und Silbernagl, Stefan (eds), Lehrbuch der Physiologie, Stuttgart: Thieme, pp. 743–756.Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1938), The Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis, New York: Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
Stein, D. L. (1998), ‘Keep off the Grass: Prohibiting Nonemployee Union Access without Discriminating’, New York University Law Review, 73: 2029–2063.Google Scholar
Sumner, W. G. (1907), Folkways: A Study of the Sociological Importance of Usages, Manners, Customs, Mores, and Morals, Boston: Ginn.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (ed.) (2000), Behavioral Law and Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. and Thaler, R. (2003), ‘Libertarian Paternalism’, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 93: 175–179.Google Scholar
Tapp, J. L. and Kohlberg, L. (1971), ‘Developing Senses of Law and Legal Justice’, Journal of Social Issues, 27: 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teuchert-Noodt, G. and Schmitz, S. (1997), ‘Neuroethologische Grundlagen zur Genese von Rechtsnormen beim Menschen’, in Lampe, Ernst-Joachim (ed.), Zur Entwicklung von Rechtsbewußtsein, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 134–151.Google Scholar
Thorndike, E. L. (1898), Animal Intelligence: An Experimental Study of the Associative Processes in Animals, New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, M. (2001), Cognitive Dimensions of Social Science, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, T. R. (1990), Why People Obey the Law, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, K. R. (1987), ‘The Coase Theorem and California Animal Trespass Law’, Journal of Legal Studies, 16: 149–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Hayek, F.-A. (1952), The Sensory Order: An Inquiry into the Foundations of Theoretical Psychology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
von Hayek, F.-A. (1982), Law, Legislation and Liberty: A New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wadsworth, B. J. (1996), Piaget's Theory of Cognitive and Affective Development: Foundations of Constructivism, White Plains, NY: Longman Publishers.Google Scholar
Würtenberger, T. (1996), Die Akzeptanz von Verwaltungsentscheidungen: Verwaltung 2000, Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Young, H. P. (1993), ‘The Evolution of Conventions’, Econometrica, 61: 57–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zitelmann, E. (1879), Irrtum und Rechtsgeschäft: Eine psychologisch-juristische Untersuchung, Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar