Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:06:46.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Institutions, ideas and economic change: some reflections on Geoffrey Hodgson's ‘Culture and Institutions’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2021

Joel Mokyr
Joel Mokyr*
Affiliation:
Departments of Economics and History, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA Berglas School of Economics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Professor Hodgson in his review of my A Culture of Growth (Princeton University Press, 2016) raises a number of important issues. One of them is the usefulness of the concept of a ‘market for ideas’ as an analytical tool in discussing the way cultural change affects economic change. Even though there is no price mechanism that clears the market, many basic components of the economic analysis of markets carry through and enriched by evolutionary concepts. A second question is the importance of cultural entrepreneurs, who play an important role in my book. It should be stressed that such ‘Vital Few’ were rarely indispensable, yet their influence on subsequent events may have imparted a direction on events and accelerated them. In any event, the success of such entrepreneurs was an indication of an intellectual environment sufficiently open to new ideas to be consistent with major new ideas such as the possibility and desirability of sustained economic progress.

Keywords

Economic growthevolutionary models
Type
Note
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 18 , Special Issue 1: Institutions and Culture in Economic Contexts , February 2022 , pp. 169 - 174
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Millennium Economics Ltd.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Note: Segments of this paper are adapted from Mokyr (2018).

References

Alesina, A. and Giuliano, P. (2015), ‘Culture and Institutions’, Journal of Economic Literature, 53(4): 898–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, A. (2002), Geometrical Landscapes: The Voyages of Discovery and the Transformation of Mathematical Practice, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Connor, S. (2004), The Book of Skin, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dittmar, J. E. and Meisenzahl, R. R. (2020), ‘Public Goods Institutions, Human Capital, and Growth: Evidence from German History’, The Review of Economic Studies, 87(2): 959–996.Google Scholar
Grell, O. P. (2007), ‘In Search of True Knowledge: Ole Worm (1588–1654) and the True Philosophy’, in Smith, P. H. and Schmidt, B. (eds.), Making Knowledge in Early Modern Europe, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 214–232.Google Scholar
Hanlon, W. (2015), ‘Necessity is the Mother of Invention: Input Supplies and Directed Technical Change’, Econometrica, 83(1): 67–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, G. (2021), ‘Culture and Institutions: A Review of Joel Mokyr's a Culture of Growth’, Journal of Institutional Economics, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137421000588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huff, T. (2011), Intellectual Curiosity and the Scientific Revolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, M. and Gráda, C. Ó. (2021), ‘Connecting the Scientific and Industrial Revolutions: The Role of Practical Mathematics’, Journal of Economic History, in press.Google Scholar
Kelly, M., Mokyr, J. and Gráda, C. Ó. (2021), ‘The Mechanics of the Industrial Revolution.’ Unpublished.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J. (2002), The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J. (2018), ‘Culture, Growth, and Economic Thought: Some Afterthoughts’, European Journal for the History of Economic Thought, 25(6): 1526–1536.Google Scholar
Morris, I. (2010), Why the West Rules – For Now, New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.Google Scholar
Price, D. J. D. S. (1984), ‘Notes towards a Philosophy of the Science/Technology Interaction’, in Laudan, R. (ed.), The Nature of Knowledge: Are Models of Scientific Change Relevant?, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 105–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiser, S. J. (1978), Medicine and the Reign of Technology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, N. (1969), ‘The Direction of Technological Change: Inducement Mechanisms and Focusing Devices’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 18(1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squicciarini, M. P. and Voigtländer, N. (2015), ‘Human Capital and Industrialization: Evidence from the Age of Enlightenment’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(4): 1825–1883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar