Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:52:44.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Individuality and habits in institutional economics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2019

Heath Spong
Heath Spong*
Affiliation:
School of Business, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper a sophisticated conception of individuality is developed that extends beyond simple heterogeneity and is consistent with the approach of institutional economics. Studies of human biological and psychological development are used to illustrate the foundations of human individuality and the impact of the social environment on individual development. The link between the social environment and ongoing agential properties is established through the role of habits, which provide some continuity to individual personalities over time and assist them in navigating the social context they inhabit. Reflexivity is established via an agency-structure framework that endows individuals a changeable self-concept and an ability to interpret their relationship to the social context. The coordination of different individuals is explained not simply through reference to institutional structure, but also through the agent-level properties of shared habits. While reducing differences between individuals to one of degrees, shared habits are shown to be particularly important in the context of agent-sensitive institutions. Finally, the potential for different institutional experiences to impact the reflexivity of individuals is explored.

Keywords

Individualityinstitutionsshared habitscoordination
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 15 , Issue 5 , October 2019 , pp. 791 - 809
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akerlof, G. A. and Kranton, R. E. (2000), ‘Economics and Identity’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3): 715–753.Google Scholar
Akerlof, G. A. and Kranton, R. E. (2005), ‘Identity and the Economics of Organizations’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19: 9–32.Google Scholar
Akerlof, G. A. and Kranton, R. E. (2008), ‘Identity, Supervision, and Work Groups’, American Economic Review, 98(2): 212–217.Google Scholar
Archer, M. S. (1995) Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Archer, M. S. (2000) Being Human: The Problem of Agency, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Archer, M. S. (2003) Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Archer, M. S. (2012) The Reflexive Imperative in Late Modernity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Badano, J. L. and Katsanis, N. (2002), ‘Beyond Mendel: An Evolving View of Human Genetic Disease Transmission’, Nature Reviews: Genetics, 3: 779–789.Google Scholar
Becker, G. S. (1992), ‘Habits, Addictions and Traditions’, Kyklos, 45(3): 327–346.Google Scholar
Bhaskar, R. (1989 [1979]) The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philisophic Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences, Brighton, Harvester.Google Scholar
Björklund, A., Jäntti, M. and Solon, G. (2007), ‘Nature and Nurture in the Intergenerational Transmission of Socioeconomic Status: Evidence from Swedish Children and their Biological and Rearing Parents’, B. E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 7(2): Article 4.Google Scholar
Bornstein, M. H. (2017), ‘The Specificity Principle in Acculturation Science’, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(1): 3–45.Google Scholar
Boulanger, G. (2015), ‘Seeing Double, Being Double: Longing, Belonging, Recognition, and Evasion in Psychodynamic Work with Immigrants’, American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 75(3): 287–303.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. (1969). Cost and Choice: An Inquiry into Economic Theory, Chicago: Markham Publishing.Google Scholar
Burdon, R. H. (1999), Genes and the Environment, London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Davis, J. B. (2003), The Theory of the Individual in Economics: Identity and Value, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Davis, J. B. (2011), Individuals and Identity in Economics, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dennet, D. C. (1981), Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dopfer, K. and Potts, J. (2004), ‘Evolutionary Realism: A New Ontology for Economics’, Journal of Economic Methodology, 11(2): 195–212.Google Scholar
Dopfer, K. and Potts, J. (2008), The General Theory of Economic Evolution, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Falck, O., Heblich, S. and Luedemann, E. (2012), ‘Identity and Entrepreneurship: Do School Peers Shape Entrepreneurial Intentions?’ Small Business Economics, 39(1): 39–59.Google Scholar
Fleetwood, S. (2008a), ‘Structure, Institution, Agency, Habit, and Reflexive Deliberation’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 4(2): 183–203.Google Scholar
Fleetwood, S. (2008b), ‘Institutions and Social Structures’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38(3): 241–265.Google Scholar
Fleetwood, S. (2017), ‘The Critical Realist Conception of Open and Closed Systems’, Journal of Economic Methodology, 24(1): 41–68.Google Scholar
Fuller, C. (2013), ‘Reflexivity, Relative Autonomy and the Embedded Individual in Economics’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 9(1): 109–129.Google Scholar
Fuller, J. (2010), Promoting Good Choices: Patterns of Habit and the Role of Government, Melbourne: Per Capita.Google Scholar
Harris, J. R. (1998), The Nurture Assumption: Why Children Turn Out The Way They Do, New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Harris, J. R. (2006), No Two Alike: Human Nature and Human Individuality, New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1973), Rules and Order. Volume 1. Law Legislation and Liberty, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hinchman, L. P. (1990), ‘The Idea of Individuality: Origins, Meaning, and Political Significance’, Journal of Politics, 52(3): 759–781.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2002), ‘Reconstitutive Downward Causation: Social Structure and the Development of Individual Agency’, in Fullbrook, E. (ed.), Intersubjectivity in Economics: Agents and Structures, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2003), ‘The Hidden Persuaders: Institutions and Individuals in Economic Theory’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27(2): 159–175.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2004), ‘Reclaiming Habit for Institutional Economics’, Journal of Economic Psychology, 25: 651–660.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2006), ‘What are Institutions?’ Journal of Economic Issues, 4(1): 1–25.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2010), ‘Choice, Habit and Evolution’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 20(1): 1–18.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2015), Conceptualizing Capitalism: Institutions, Evolution, Future, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. and Knudsen, T. (2004), ‘The Firm as an Interactor: Firms as Vehicles for Habits and Routines’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(3): 281–307.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. and Knudsen, T. (2010), Darwin's Conjecture: The Search for General Principles of Social and Economic Evolution, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jobling, M., Hurles, M. and Tyler-Smith, C. (2004), Human Evolutionary Genetics: Origins, Peoples, and Disease, New York: Garland/Routledge.Google Scholar
Jordan, E. (1921), ‘The Definition of Individuality.’ Philosophical Review, 30(6): 566–584.Google Scholar
Kirzner, I. (1997), ‘Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach’, Journal of Economic Literature, 35(4): 60–85.Google Scholar
Lachmann, L. M. (1971), The Legacy of Max Weber, Berkeley, CA: Glendessary Press.Google Scholar
Lane, D., Malerba, F., Maxfield, R. and Orsenigo, L. (1996), ‘Choice and Action’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 6: 43–76.Google Scholar
Lawlor, M. S. (2006), ‘William James's Psychological Pragmatism: Habit, Belief and Purposive Human Behaviour’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30(3): 321–345.Google Scholar
Lerner, J. and Malmendier, U. (2011), ‘With a Little Help from My (Random) Friends: Success and Failure in Post-Business School Entrepreneurship’, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 16918.Google Scholar
Levit, G. S., Hossfeld, U. and Witt, U. (2011), ‘Can Darwinism be “Generalized” and of What Use Would This Be?’ Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 21(4): 545–562.Google Scholar
Liem, M. and Kunst, M. (2013) ‘Is there a Recognizable Post-Incarceration Syndrome among Released “Lifers”?’ International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 36(3–4): 333–337.Google Scholar
Lisman, J. and Sternberg, E. (2013), ‘Habit and Nonhabit Systems for Unconscious and Conscious Behavior: Implications for Multitasking.’ Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(2): 273–283.Google Scholar
Nanda, R. and Sorensen, J. B. (2010), ‘Workplace Peers and Entrepreneurship’, Management Science, 56(7): 1116–1126.Google Scholar
Neal, D. T., Wood, W. and Drolet, A. (2013) ‘How do People Adhere to Goals when Willpower is Low? The Profits (and Pitfalls) of Strong Habits’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(6): 959–975.Google Scholar
Nicolaou, N. and Shane, S. (2009), ‘Can Genetic Factors Influence the Likelihood of Engaging in Entrepreneurial Activity?’ Journal of Business Venturing, 24(1): 1–22.Google Scholar
North, D. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O'Driscoll, G. and Rizzo, M. (1996), The Economics of Time and Ignorance, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
O'Hare, J. K., Ade, K. K., Sukharnikova, T., Van Hooser, S. D., Palmeri, M. L., Henry, H. H. and Calakose, N. (2016), ‘Pathway-Specific Striatal Substrates for Habitual Behavior’, Neuron, Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Parrington, J. (2015), Deeper Genome: Why there is more to the Human Genome than Meets the Eye, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2004), ‘Why Nature and Nurture Won't Go Away’, Daedalus, 133(4): 5–17.Google Scholar
Plomin, R. and Daniels, D. (1987), ‘Why Are Children in the Same Family so Different from One Another?’ Behavioral Brain Sciences, 10(1): 1–16.Google Scholar
Plomin, R., Owen, M. J. and McGuffin, P. (1994), ‘The Genetic Basis of Complex Human Behaviors’, Science, 264(51): 1733–1739.Google Scholar
Rothman, A. J., Sheeran, P. and Wood, W. (2009) ‘Reflective and Automatic Processes in the Initiation and Maintenance of Dietary Change’, Annals of Behavioural Medicine, 38 (Suppl 1): 4–17.Google Scholar
Rowe, D. (1994), The Limits of Family Influence: Genes, Experience, and Behavior, New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Shackle, G. L. S. (1979), Imagination and the Nature of Choice. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1956), ‘Rational Choice and the Structure of the Environment’, Psychological Review, 63(2): 129–138.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1957), Models of Man, Social and Rational: Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1776), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. (1993 edition, edited by Sutherland, Kathryn), New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sonn, C. C., Ivey, G., Baker, A., Meyer, K. (2017) ‘Post-Apartheid South African Immigrants in Australia: Negotiating Displacement, Identity, and Belonging’, Qualitative Psychology, 4(1): 41–54.Google Scholar
Tullock, G. (1994), The Economics of Non-Human Societies. Arizona: Pallas Press Tuscon.Google Scholar
Vanberg, V. J. (2002), ‘Rational Choice versus Program-Based Behavior: Alternative Theoretical Approaches and their Relevance for the Study of Institutions’, Rationality and Society, 14(1): 7–53.Google Scholar
Vanberg, V. J. (2004), ‘The Rationality Postulate in Economics: Its Ambiguity, Its Deficiency and Its Evolutionary Alternative’, Journal of Economic Methodology, 11(1): 1–29.Google Scholar
Verplanken, B. and Faes, S. (1999) ‘Good Intentions, Bad Habits, and Effects of Forming Implementation Intentions on Healthy Eating’, European Journal of Social Psychology, 29: 591–604.Google Scholar
Witt, U. (2009), ‘Propositions about Novelty’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 79(1–2): 311–329.Google Scholar
Wood, W. and Neal, T. (2007), ‘A New Look at Habits and the Habit-Goal Interface’, Psychological Review, 114(4): 843–863.Google Scholar
Wood, W. and Neal, T. (2009), ‘The Habitual Consumer’, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19: 579–592.Google Scholar
Wood, W. and Rünger, D. (2016), ‘Psychology of Habit’, Annual Review of Psychology, 67: 11.1–11.26.Google Scholar