Hostname: page-component-599cfd5f84-v8j7l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T06:21:41.833Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How (not) to measure institutions: a reply to Robinson and Shirley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2012

STEFAN VOIGT
STEFAN VOIGT*
Affiliation:
Institute of Law and Economics, University of Hamburg, Hamburg and CESifo, Munich, Germany
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

This is a short reply to the comments by James Robinson and Mary Shirley on my paper ‘How (not) to measure institutions’.

Type
Comment
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , March 2013 , pp. 35 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brady, Henry, David, Collier and Jason, Seawright (2006), Toward a Pluralistic Vision of Methodology, Political Analysis, 14: 353–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayo, B. and Voigt, S. (2007), ‘Explaining De Facto Judicial Independence’, International Review of Law and Economics, 27 (3): 269–290.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. A. (2013), ‘Measuring Institutions in the Tobriand Islands: A Comment of Voigt's Paper’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 9 (1): March.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roland, G. (2004), ‘Understanding Institutional Change: Fast-Moving and Slow-Moving Institutions’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 38 (4): 109–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirley, M. M. (2013), ‘Measuring Institutions: How to be Precise though Vague’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 9 (1): March.CrossRefGoogle Scholar