Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T16:33:36.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Frank A. Fetter (1863–1949): Capital (1930)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2008

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Fragment
Copyright
Copyright © The JOIE Foundation 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arrow, Kenneth J. (1999), ‘Observations on social capital’, in Dasgupta, Partha and Serageldin, Ismail (eds), Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective, Washington, DC: World Bank, pp. 35.Google Scholar
Baron, Stephen, Field, John, and Schuller, Tom (eds) (2000), Social Capital: Critical Perspectives, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. (1964), Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis with Special Reference to Education, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. (1996), Accounting for Tastes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1977), Outline of a Theory of Practice, translated by Nice, Richard, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1990), The Logic of Practice, translated by Nice, Richard from the French edition of 1980, Stanford and Cambridge: Stanford University Press and Polity Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, James S. (1988), ‘Social capital in the creation of human capital’, American Journal of Sociology, 94 (supplement): S95S120.Google Scholar
Coleman, James S. (1990), Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dei Ottati, Gabi (1994), ‘Trust, interlinking transactions and credit in the industrial district’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 18 (6): 529546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetter, Frank A. (1927), ‘Clark's reformulation of the capital concept’, in Hollander, Jacob H. (ed.), Economic Essays Contributed in Honor of John Bates Clark, New York: Macmillan, pp. 136156.Google Scholar
Fetter, Frank A. (1930), ‘Capital’, in Seligman, Edwin R. A. and Johnson, Alvindr (eds), Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 3, New York: Macmillan, pp. 187190.Google Scholar
Fine, Ben (2001), Social Capital versus Social Theory: Political Economy and Social Science at the Turn of the Millennium, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis (2000), Social Capital and Civil Society, International Monetary Fund Working Paper WP/00/74, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Hanifan, Lyda J. (1916), ‘The rural school community center’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 67: 130138.Google Scholar
Harcourt, Geoffrey C. (1972), Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hartwick, John (1991), ‘Degradation of environmental capital and national accounting procedures’, European Economic Review, 35(23): 642649.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey M. (2001), How Economics Forgot History: The Problem of Historical Specificity in Social Science, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Knies, Karl (1873), Das Geld, Berlin: Weidman.Google Scholar
Knorringa, Peter and van Staveren, Irene (2007), ‘Beyond social capital: a critical approach’, Review of Social Economy, 65 (1): 19.Google Scholar
Lindenberg, Siegwart (1993), ‘Club hierarchy, social metering and context instruction: governance structures in response to varying self-command capital’, in Lindenberg, S. and Schreuder, H. (eds), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Organization Studies, Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 195220.Google Scholar
Marshall, Alfred (1890), Principles of Economics: An Introductory Volume, 1st edn, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl (1867), Das Kapital: Kritik der politischen Ökonomie, vol. 1, Hamburg: Meissner.Google Scholar
Mouzelis, Nicos (1995), Sociological Theory: What Went Wrong? Diagnosis and Remedies, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. (1995), ‘Tuning in, tuning out: the strange disappearance of social capital in America’, PS: Political Science and Politics, 28 (4): 664683.Google Scholar
Putnams, Robert D. (2000), Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas (1978), Scientific Progress: A Philosophical Essay on the Economics of Research in Natural Science, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Robinson, Joan (1979), Collected Economic Papers – Volume Five, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Samuels, Warren J. (1989), ‘Austrian and institutional economics: some common elements’, Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 6: 5371.Google Scholar
Schultz, Theodore W. (1960), ‘Capital formation by education’, Journal of Political Economy, 68 (4): 571583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1954), History of Economic Analysis, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Solow, Robert M. (1999), ‘Notes on social capital and economic performance’, in Dasgupta, Partha and Serageldin, Ismail (eds), Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective, Washington, DC: World Bank, pp. 610.Google Scholar
Sombart, Werner (1902), Der moderne Kapitalismus: Historisch-systematische Darstellung des gesamteuropäischen Wirtschaftslebens von seinen Anfängen bis zur Gegenwart, 1st edn, 2 vols, Munich und Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Tomer, John F. (1987), Organizational Capital: The Path to Higher Productivity and Well-Being, New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein B. (1904), The Theory of Business Enterprise, New York: Charles Scribners.Google Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein B. (1919), The Place of Science in Modern Civilization and Other Essays, New York: Huebsch.Google Scholar
Wynarczyk, Peter (1992), ‘Comparing alleged incommensurables: institutional and Austrian economics as rivals and possible complements?’, Review of Political Economy, 4 (1): 1836.Google Scholar