Hostname: page-component-599cfd5f84-8nxqw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T06:45:24.383Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A forum on minds and institutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

TEPPO FELIN
TEPPO FELIN*
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, Saïd Business School, Park End Street, OX2 7QE Oxford, UK
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purpose of this special topic forum is to call for research on the topic of minds and institutions. I briefly discuss three specific research opportunities: (1) bounded rationality versus mind, (2) many minds and the interfaces of institutions, (3) the affordances of institutions and arbitrage. I then briefly introduce the two special topic forum papers and highlight how they link to the topic of minds and institutions.

Type
A forum on minds and institutions
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , September 2015 , pp. 523 - 534
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arrow, K. (1974), Limits of Organization, W.W. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. and Debreu, G. (1954), ‘Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy’, Econometrica, 22 (3): 265–290.Google Scholar
Baldwin, C. (2008), ‘Where do transactions come from?’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 17: 155–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, C. and Hippel, E. (2011), ‘Modeling a paradigm shift: From producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation’, Organization Science, 22 (6): 1399–1417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benkler, Y. (2002), ‘Coase's penguin, or linux and the nature of the firm’, Yale Law Journal, 112 (3): 369–447.Google Scholar
Bolton, G. E. and Ockenfels, A. (2012), ‘Behavioral economic engineering’, Journal of Economic Psychology, 33 (3): 665–676.Google Scholar
Boudreau, K. J., Lacetera, N., and Lakhani, K. R. (2011), ‘Incentives and problem uncertainty in innovation contests’, Management Science, 57 (5): 843–863.Google Scholar
Caldwell, B. (2004), Hayek's Challenge: An Intellectual Biography of F. A. Hayek, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clippel, G. d. (2014), ‘Behavioral implementation’, American Economic Review, 104 (10): 2975–3002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, R. H. (1937), ‘The Nature of the Firm’, Economica, 4: 386–405.Google Scholar
Crowther-Heyck, H. (2005), Herbert A. Simon: The Bounds of Reason in Modern America, Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Denrell, J., Fang, C., and Winter, S. G. (2003), ‘The economics of strategic opportunity’, Strategic Management Journal, 24 (10): 977–990.Google Scholar
Devins, C., Koppl, R., Kauffman, S., and Felin, T. (2015), Against Design, SSRN Working Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dosi, G. and Marengo, L. (2014), ‘The dynamics of organizational structures and performances under diverging distributions of knowledge and different power structures’, Journal of Institutional Economics, published online. doi.org/10.1017/S1744137414000204.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (2000), Ulysses Unbound: Studies in Rationality, Precommitment, and Constraints, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felin, T. and Knudsen, T. (2012), ‘A theory of nascent entrepreneurship and organization’, Managerial and Decision Economics, 33 (5–6): 409–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felin, T. and Zenger, T. R. (2009), ‘Entrepreneur as theorist: On the origins of collective beliefs and novel strategies’, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3 (2): 127–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felin, T. and Zenger, T. R. (2014), ‘Open or closed innovation: Problem solving and the governance choice’, Research Policy, 43 (5): 914–925.Google Scholar
Felin, T., Kauffman, S., Koppl, R., and Longo, G. (2014), ‘Economic opportunity and evolution: Beyond landscapes and bounded rationality’ Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 8 (4): 269–282.Google Scholar
Goodin, R. E. (ed.) (1999), The Theory of Institutional Design, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gombrich, E. (1956), Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation, London, UK: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. (1945), ‘The Use of Knowledge in Society’, American Economic Review, 35: 519–30.Google Scholar
Heath, C., Larrick, R. P., and Klayman, J. (1998), ‘Cognitive repairs: How organizations compensate for the shortcomings of individual learners’, Research in Organizational Behavior, 20: 1–37.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. (1970), Exit, Voice, and Loyalty, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, D. (2009), ‘The interface theory of perception’, in Dickinson, S., Tarr, M., Leonardis, A., and Schiele, B. (eds.), Object Categorization, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kandel, E. (2012), The Age of Insight, New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Katz, E. and Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955), Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications, Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Koenderink, J. J. (2010), ‘Vision and information’, Perception beyond inference: The information content of visual processes, Albertazzi, L. G., Tonder, J. and Vishwanath, D. (eds.), Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Landemore, H. and Elster, J. (2012), Collective Wisdom: Principles and Mechanisms, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Litov, L. P., Moreton, P., and Zenger, T. R. (2012), ‘Corporate strategy, analyst coverage, and the uniqueness paradox’, Management Science, 58 (10): 1797–1815.Google Scholar
Malmgren, H. B. (1961), ‘Information, expectations and the theory of the firm’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75 (3): 399–421.Google Scholar
March, J. (1962), ‘The business firm as a political coalition’, Journal of Politics, 24 (4): 662–678.Google Scholar
Menard, C. and Shirley, M. M. (2014), ‘The future of new institutional economics: From early intuitions to a new paradigm’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 10 (4): 541–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. C. (2005), Understanding the Process of Economic Change, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1969), Objective Knowledge, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, T.C., Lovallo, D. and Fox, C.R. (2011), ‘Behavioral strategy’, Strategic Management Journal, 32(special issue): 1369–1386.Google Scholar
Rothschild, E. (2001), Economic Sentiments: Adam Smith, Condorcet, and the Enlightenment. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sah, R. K. and Stiglitz, J. E. (1985), ‘The architecture of economic systems: Hierarchies and polyarchies’, American Economic Review, 76 (4): 716–727.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (2009), The Idea of Justice, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Simmel, G. (2011), Philosophy of Money, New York, New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1955), ‘A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69 (1): 99–118.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1956), ‘Rational choice and the structure of the environment’, Psychological Review, 63 (2): 129–138.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1991), ‘Organizations and markets’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5 (2): 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1996), The Sciences of the Artificial, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, A. (1990), Information and Organizations, Berkeley, California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2012), ‘Behavioral economics and paternalism’, Yale Law Journal, 122: 1826–1899.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. and Hastie, R. (2014), ‘Garbage in, garbage out? Some micro sources of macro errors’, Journal of Institutional Economics, published online. doi.org/10.1017/S1744137413000398.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, A. (1840/2000), Democracy in America, Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Uexküll, J. (1934/2010), A Foray into the Worlds of Animals and Humans, Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Van den Steen, E. (2005), ‘Organizational beliefs and managerial vision’, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 21 (1): 256–283.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Wright, J. D. and Ginsburg, D. H. (2012), ‘Behavioral law and economics: Its origins, fatal flaws, and implications for liberty’, Northwestern University Law Review, 106 (3): 1033–1090.Google Scholar
Zenger, T., Felin, T., and Bigelow, L. (2011), ‘Theories of the firm-market boundary’, Academy of Management Annals, 5 (1): 89–133.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, E. W. (1999), ‘The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount’, American Journal of Sociology, 104 (5): 1398–1438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar