Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T12:43:48.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Elite collective agency and the state

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2019

Korkut Alp Ertürk
Korkut Alp Ertürk*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper explores how elites can develop capacity for collective agency through coordination.. The challenge for elites is to simultaneously deter the state from abusing power while at the same time relying on it to discipline defectors in their midst..The basic insight holds that the credibility of the state's threats depends on the cost of carrying them out, which elites can control. The elites can coordinate by being compliant when the ruler's threats serve their collective interest, which by reducing the cost of carrying them out make them more credible. On the other hand, their coordinated non-compliance has the opposite effect...

Keywords

Elitescollective agencystate powercoordinationcredible threatssubgame imperfect equilibrium
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , February 2020 , pp. 13 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Moselle, B. and Polak, B. (2001), ‘A Model of the Predatory State’, Journal of Law and Economics and Organization, 17(1): 1–13.Google Scholar
Konrad, K. and Skaperdas, S. (2012), ‘The Market for Protection and the Origin of the State’, Economic Theory, 50(2): 417–443.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. (2006), Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. (2012), Why Nations Fail? The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty, New York: Crown Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Albertus, M. (2015), Autocracy and Redistribution: The Politics of Land Reform, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Albertus, M. and Menaldo, V. (2014), ‘Gaming Democracy: Elite Dominance during Transition and the Prospect of for Redistribution’, British Journal of Political Science, 44(3): 575–603.Google Scholar
Ansell, B. and Samuels, D. (2014), Inequality and Democratization: An Elite-Competition Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barzel, Y. (2002), A Theory of the State: Economic Rights, Legal Rights, and the Scope of the State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, R. (2001), Prosperity and Violence: The Political Economy of Development, New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Bates, R. (2008), When Things Fall Apart: State Failure in Late Century Africa, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, R. (2010), ‘A Review of Douglass C. North, John Joseph Wallis, and Barry R. Weingast's Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History’, Journal of Economic Literature, 48(3): 752–756.Google Scholar
Bates, R., Greif, A. and Singh, S. (2002), ‘Organizing Violence’, Journal of Conflict Resolutions, 6(5): 599–628.Google Scholar
Dal Bo, E. and Dal Bo, P. (2011), ‘Workers, Warriors and Criminals: Social Conflict in General Equilibrium’, Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(4): 646–677.Google Scholar
Francois, P., Rainer, I. and Trebbi, F. (2015), ‘How is Power Shared in Africa?’ Econometrica, 83(2): 465–503.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, M. (2004), ‘Stable Alliance Formation in Distributional Conflict’, European Journal of Political Economy, 20(4): 829–852.Google Scholar
Gennaioli, N. and Voth, H-J. (2015), ‘State Capacity and Military Conflict’, Review of Economic Studies, 82(4): 1409–1448.Google Scholar
Greif, A. (1994), ‘On the Political Foundations of the Late Medieval Commercial Revolution: Genoa during the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries’, Journal of Economic History, 54(4): 271–87.Google Scholar
Greif, A. (2005), ‘Commitment, Coercion, and Markets: The Nature and Dynamics of Institutions Supporting Exchange’, in Menard, C. and Shirley, M. (eds), Handbook of New Institutional Economics, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 727–786.Google Scholar
Grossman, H. and Kim, M. (1995), ‘Swords or Ploughshares? A Theory of the Security Claims to Property’, Journal of Political Economy, 103(6): 1275–1288.Google Scholar
Haber, S. (2006), ‘Authoritarian Government’, in Weingast, B. and Whittman, D. (eds), Handbook Political Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hardin, R. (1995), One for All. The Logic of Group Conflict, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, S. (1999), Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
North, D. (1981), Structure and Change in Economic History, New York: Norton.Google Scholar
North, D. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
North, D. and Weingast, B. (1989), ‘Constitutions and Commitment: Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice’, Journal of Economic History, 49(4): 803–832.Google Scholar
North, D., Wallis, J. and Weingast, B. (2009), Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, M. (1982), The Rise and Decline of Nations, New York: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, M. (1993), ‘Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development’, American Political Science Review, 87(3): 567–575.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2003), ‘How Types of Goods and Property Rights Jointly Affect Collective Action’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15(3): 239–270.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2015), Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, G. (1996), The Military Revolution: Military Intervention and the Rise of the West, 1500–1800, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skaperdas, S. (1992), ‘Cooperation, Conflict, and Power in the Absence of Property Rights’, American Economic Review, 82(4): 720–738.Google Scholar
Skaperdas, S. (1998), ‘On the Formation of Alliances in Conflict and Contests’, Public Choice, 96(1/2): 25–42.Google Scholar
Skaperdas, S. and Sympoulos, C. (2002), ‘Insecure Property Rights and the Stability of Exchange’, Economic Journal, 112(476): 133–146.Google Scholar
Smith, V. (1975), ‘The Economics of the Primitive Hunter Culture, Pleistocene Extinctions and the Rise of Agriculture’, Journal Political Economy, 83(4): 727–756.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. (1990), Coercion, Capital and European State, Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Usher, D. (1989), ‘The Dynastic Cycle and the Stationary State’, American Economic Review, 79(5), 1031–1043.Google Scholar
Van Bavel, B., Ansink, E. and van Besouw, B. (2017), ‘Understanding the Economics of Limited Access Orders: Incentives, Organizations and the Chronology of Developments’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 13(1): 109–131.Google Scholar
Van Besouw, B., Ansink E., E., and van Bavel, B. (2016), ‘The Economics of Violence in Natural States’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 132: 139–156.Google Scholar
Weingast, B. (1997), ‘The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law’, American Political Science Review, 91(2): 245–263.Google Scholar