Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:01:17.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Editorial introduction to ‘Collectivist planning’ by Michael Polanyi (1940)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2019

Geoffrey M. Hodgson  and
Michael Polanyi
Geoffrey M. Hodgson*
Affiliation:
Loughborough University London
Michael Polanyi
Affiliation:
Loughborough University London
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

After an esteemed academic career as a chemist, Michael Polanyi switched to the social sciences and made significant contributions to our understanding of the nature and role of knowledge in society. Polanyi's argument concerning knowledge led him to emphasise the vital importance of decentralised mechanisms of adjustment and coordination, including markets. His article ‘Collectivist Planning’ (1940) enters into debates about the possibility (or otherwise) of centrally planning scientific and economic activity. This early article also foreshadows post-war debates within the Mont Pèlerin Socierty (formed in 1947) concerning the economic role of the state and the future of liberalism.

Keywords

Michael Polanyiknowledgesciencesocialismmarkets
Type
Fragment
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 15 , Issue 6 , December 2019 , pp. 1055 - 1074
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, R. T. (1998), Beyond Liberalism: The Political Thought of F. A. Hayek and Michael Polanyi, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Bladel, J. P. (2005), ‘Against Polanyi-Centrism: Hayek and the Re-emergence of “Spontaneous Order”’, Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 8(4): 15–30.Google Scholar
Block, F. and Somers, M. (2014), The Power of Market Fundamentalism: Karl Polanyi's Critique, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burgin, A. (2012), The Great Persuasion: Reinventing Free Markets since the Depression, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dale, G. (2010), Karl Polanyi: The Limits to the Market, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
D'Amico, D. J. (2015), ‘Spontaneous Order’, in Boettke, Peter J. and Coyne, Christopher (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Austrian Economics, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 115–142.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1993), ‘Coevolution of Neocortical Size, Group Size, and Language’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16(4): 681–694.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (2010), How many Friends does One Person Need? Dunbar's Number and other Evolutionary Quirks, London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (2011), ‘Constraints on the Evolution of Social Institutions and their Implications for Information Flow’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(3): 345–371.Google Scholar
Gulick, L. and Urwick, L. (eds) (1937), Papers on the Science of Administration, New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1944), The Road to Serfdom, London: George Routledge.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2007), ‘The Impossibility of Social Democracy by Albert E. F. Schäffle’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 3(1): 113–125.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2015), Conceptualizing Capitalism: Institutions, Evolution, Future, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2017), ‘Karl Polanyi on Economy and Society: A Critical Analysis of Core Concepts’, Review of Social Economy, 75(1): 1–25.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2019a), ‘How Mythical Markets Mislead Analysis: An Institutionalist Critique of Market Universalism’, Socio-Economic Review, published online.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2019b), Is Socialism Feasible? Towards an Alternative Future, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2019c), Is There a Future for Heterodox Economics? Institutions, Ideology and a Scientific Community, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Jacobs, S. (2000), ‘Spontaneous Order: Michael Polanyi and Friedrich Hayek’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 3(4): 49–67.Google Scholar
Jacobs, S. and Mullins, P. (2016), ‘Friedrich Hayek and Michael Polanyi in Correspondence’, History of European Ideas, 42(1): 107–30.Google Scholar
Jaques, E. (1988), Requisite Organisation, A Total System for Effective Managerial Organization and Managerial Leadership for the 21st Century, Gloucester, MA: Cason Hall.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. (1993), The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lavoie, D. (1985), Rivalry and Central Planning: The Socialist Calculation Debate Reconsidered, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, K. D. (1978), Organizational Structures, Northbrook, IL: AHM Publishing.Google Scholar
Mirowski, P. (1998), ‘Economics, Science and Knowledge: Polanyi vs. Hayek’, Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical, 25(1): 29–42.Google Scholar
Mirowski, P. and Plehwe, D. (eds) (2009), The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nye, M. J. (2011), Michael Polanyi and His Generation: Origins of the Social Construction of Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Oğuz, F. (2010), ‘Hayek on Tacit Knowledge’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 6(2), June: 145–165.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1940), The Contempt of Freedom: The Russian Experiment and After, London: Watts.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1941), ‘The Growth of Thought in Society’, Economica (new series), 8(32): 428–456.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. (1944), The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time, New York: Rinehart.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1944), ‘Patent Reform’, Review of Economic Studies, 11(2): 61–76.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1945), Full Employment and Free Trade, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1948), ‘Planning and Spontaneous Order’, The Manchester School, 16: 237–268. Reprinted in Polanyi (1951).Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1951), The Logic of Liberty: Reflections and Rejoinders, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1957), ‘The Foolishness of History: November 1917–November 1957’, Encounter, 9(5): 33–37. Reprinted in Polanyi (1997).Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1958), Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1962a), ‘The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory’, Minerva, 1(1): 54–73.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1962b), ‘Tacit Knowing: Its Bearing on Some Problems of Philosophy’, Reviews of Modern Physics, 34(4): 601–615.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1967), The Tacit Dimension, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1997), Society, Economics and Philosophy: Selected Papers, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Röpke, W. (1960), A Humane Economy: The Social Framework of the Free Market, Chicago: Henry Regnery.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, H. (2018), The Lost History of Liberalism: From Ancient Rome to the Twenty-First Century, Princeton NJ and Oxford UK: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schäffle, A. E. F. (1870), Kapitalismus und Sozialismus: mit besonderer Riicksicht auf Geschäfts und Vermögensformen, Tübingen: Laupp.Google Scholar
Schäffle, A. E. F. (1892), The Impossibility of Social Democracy: Being a Supplement to ‘The Quintessence of Socialism’, London: Swan Sonnenschein and New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Schäffle, A. E. F. (1908), The Quintessence of Socialism, London: Swan Sonnenschein and New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1947), Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1957), Models of Man: Social and Rational. Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Steele, D. R. (1992), From Marx to Mises: Post-Capitalist Society and the Challenge of Economic Calculation, La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Vatiero, M. (2010), ‘ The Ordoliberal notion of market power: an institutionalist reassessment’, European Competition Journal, 6(3): 689–707.Google Scholar
Vaughn, K. I. (1980), ‘Economic Calculation under Socialism: The Austrian Contribution’, Economic Inquiry, 18(4): 535–554.Google Scholar
Webb, S. J. and Webb, B. (1935), Soviet Communism: A New Civilisation? London: Longmans Green and Left Book Club.Google Scholar