Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:47:48.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Competitive federalism, government's dual role and the power to tax

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2016

VIKTOR J. VANBERG
VIKTOR J. VANBERG*
Affiliation:
University of Freiburg and Walter Eucken Institut Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Theories of competitive federalism generally focus on exit as the principal mechanism for making governments responsive to the interests of those who are subject to their powers. This paper draws attention to the fact that democratic governments act in two distinguishable roles, as ‘territorial enterprises’ and as ‘club enterprises’. As territorial enterprises they define and enforce the rules and terms that apply to everybody, whether citizen or alien, who resides and/or operates within their jurisdictional boundaries. As club enterprises, they define and enforce the rules and terms of membership in the respective polity. The focus of this paper is on the implications of the fact that ‘exit’ means something different when one looks at governments’ role as territorial enterprises (exit = leaving the territory) in contrast to their role as club enterprises (exit = giving up one's membership status/citizenship).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , December 2016 , pp. 825 - 845
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References 55

Brennan, G. and Buchanan, J. M. (1980), The Power to Tax – Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Breton, A. (1987), ‘Towards a Theory of Competitive Federalism’, European Journal of Political Economy, 3: 263–329.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. (1960 [1949]), ‘The Pure Theory of Government Finance’, in Buchanan, J. M. (ed.), Fiscal Theory and Political Economy – Selected Essays, Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, pp. 8–23.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. (1975), The Limits of Liberty – Between Anarchy and Leviathan, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. (1977 [1976]), ‘Taxation in Fiscal Exchange’, in Buchanan, J. M., Freedom in Constitutional Contract, College Station and London: Texas A&M University Press, pp. 254–270.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. (1984), ‘Ethical Limits of Taxation’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 86: 102–114.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. (2000 [1979]), ‘Constitutional Constraints on Governmental Taxing Power’, Debt and Taxes, Vol. 14 of The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, pp. 250–265.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. (2001 [1985]), ‘Political Economy and Social Philosophy’, Moral Science and Moral Order, Vol. 17 of The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, pp. 235–250.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. (2001 [1995]), ‘Federalism as an Ideal Political Order and an Objective for Constitutional Reform’, Federalism, Liberty, and the Law, Vol. 18, the Collected Works of James M. Buchanan, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, pp. 67–78.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. (2001 [1995/96]), ‘Federalism and Individual Sovereignty’, Federalism, Liberty, and the Law, Vol. 18 of The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, pp. 79–89.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. and Flowers, M. R. (1987), The Public Finances. An Introductory Textbook, Sixth Edition, Homewood, Ill: Irwin.Google Scholar
Dercks, A. (1996), Redistributionspolitik und föderale Ordnung, Köln: Institut für Wirtschaftspolitik an der Universität zu Köln.Google Scholar
De Viti de Marco, A. (1936 [1928]), First Principles of Public Finance, London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Dye, T. R. (1990), American Federalism: Competition Among Governments, Lexington, Massachusetts/Toronto: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Feld, L. (2005), ‘The European Constitution Project from the Perspective of Constitutional Political Economy’, Public Choice, 122: 417–448.Google Scholar
Gerloff, W. (1928), ‘Die Rechtfertigung der Besteuerung’, in Teschemacher, H. (ed.), vol. 2, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), pp. 141–157.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1948 [1939]), ‘The Economic Conditions of Interstate Federalism’, in Hayek, F. A., Individualism and Economic Order, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 255–272.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1960), The Constitution of Liberty, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1973), Law, Legislation and Liberty, Vol. 1, Rules and Order, London and Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1978), ‘Whither Democracy?’, New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 152–162.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1979), The Political Order of a Free People. Vol. 3 of Law, Legislation and Liberty, London and Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. (1970), Exit, Voice and Loyalty. Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kerber, W. (2000), ‘Interjurisdictional Competition Within the European Union’, Fordham International Law Journal, 23: S217–S249.Google Scholar
Knight, F. H. (1982 [1947]), ‘The Sickness of Liberal Society’, Freedom and Reform – Essays in Economics and Social Philosophy, Indianapolis: Liberty Press, pp. 440–478.Google Scholar
Lindahl, E. (1919), Die Gerechtigkeit der Besteuerung, Lund: Gleerupska Universitets-Bokhandeln.Google Scholar
Musgrave, R. A. (1969), ‘Theories of Fiscal Federalism’, Public Finance, 24: 521–532.Google Scholar
Musgrave, R. A. (1999), ‘Fiscal Federalism’, in Buchanan, J. M. and Musgrave, R. A. (eds.), Public Finance and Public Choice. Two Contrasting Visions of the State, Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 155–175.Google Scholar
Niskanen, W. (2006), ‘Build a Wall around the Welfare State, Not around the Country’, Cato Policy Report, September/October 2006, Washington: Cato Institute.Google Scholar
Nowrasteh, A. and Cole, S. (2013), ‘Building a Wall around the Welfare State, Instead of the Country’, Policy Analysis No. 732, July 25, 2013, Washington: Cato Institute.Google Scholar
Oates, W. E. (1972), Fiscal Federalism, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1966), The Open Society and Its Enemies, 2vls., Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Preuss, H. (1964 [1889]), Gemeinde, Staat, Reich als Gebietskörperschaften – Versuch einer deutschen Staatskonstruktion auf Grundlage der Genossenschaftstheorie, Neudruck der Ausgabe Berlin 1889, Aalen: Scientia Verlag.Google Scholar
Proudhon, P.-J. (2012 [1861]), Theorie der Steuer, Marburg: Metropolis-Verlag (the French original Théorie de l'Impot was published in 1861).Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971), A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1999), The Law of People, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schanz, G. (1892), ‘Zur Frage der Steuerpflicht’, Finanzarchiv, 9: 1–74.Google Scholar
Schönberger, C. (2005), Unionsbürger – Europas föderales Bürgerrecht in vergleichender Sicht, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Schönberger, C. (2007), ‘European Citizenship as Federal Citizenship. Some citizenship lessons of comparative federalism’, European Review of Public Law, 19: 61–81.Google Scholar
Sinn, H.-W. (1990), ‘The Limits to Competition Between Economic Regimes’, Empirica, 17: 3–14.Google Scholar
Sinn, H.-W. (1994), ‘How Much Europe? Subsidiarity, Centralization and Fiscal Competiton’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 41: 85–107.Google Scholar
Sinn, H.-W. (1997), ‘The Selection Principle and Market Failure in Systems Competition’, Journal of Public Economics, 66: 247–274.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. J. (1965), ‘The Tenable Range of Functions of Local Government’, in Phelps, E. S. (ed.), Private Wants and Public Needs, rev. ed., New York: W.W. Norton, 167–176.Google Scholar
Tiebout, C. (1956), ‘A Pure Theory of Local Expenditure’, Journal of Political Economy, 64: 416–424.Google Scholar
Vanberg, V. J. (2011), ‘Competition among governments: The state's two roles in a globalized world’, in Choi, Y. B. (ed.), Institutional Economics and National Competitiveness, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 24–43.Google Scholar
Vaubel, R. (2008), ‘A history of thought on institutional competition’, in Bergh, A. and Höijer, R. (eds.), Institutional Competition, Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 29–66.Google Scholar
Weingast, B. R. (1995), ‘The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market Preserving Federalism and Economic Development’, Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 11: 1–31.Google Scholar
Weingast, B. R. (2008), ‘The Performance and Stability of Federalism’, in Ménard, C. and Shirley, M. M. (eds.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 149–172.Google Scholar