Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:57:40.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Carl Menger: Contribution to the Theory of Capital (1888), Section V

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2020

Eduard Braun*
Affiliation:
Institute of Management and Economics, Clausthal University of Technology, Julius-Albert Str. 2, 38678Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Fragment
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Böhm-Bawerk, E. V. ([1889](1930)), The Positive Theory of Capital, trans. Smart, W., New York: G. E. Stechert & Co.Google Scholar
Braun, E. (2015), ‘Carl Menger's Contribution to Capital Theory’, History of Economic Ideas, 23(1): 7799.Google Scholar
Braun, E. (2017), ‘The Theory of Capital as a Theory of Capitalism’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 13(2): 305325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, E., Lewin, P. and Cachanosky, N. (2016), ‘Ludwig von Mises's Approach to Capital as a Bridge between Austrian and Institutional Economics’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 12(4): 847866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1934), ‘Carl Menger’, Economica 1(4): 393420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2004), ‘Austrian Economics, Evolutionary Psychology and Individual Actions’, Advances in Austrian Economics, 7: 6178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2008), ‘Frank A. Fetter (1863–1949): Capital (1930)’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 4(1): 127132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2014), ‘What is Capital? Economists and Sociologists have Changed Its Meaning: Should It be Changed Back?Cambridge Journal of Economics, 38(5): 10631086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2019), ‘Austrian Economics is still not Institutional Enough’, Advances in Austrian Economics, 24: 101110.Google Scholar
Hülsmann, G. (2007), Mises. The Last Knight of Liberalism, Auburn, Al: Mises Institute.Google Scholar
Jevons, W. S. (1871). The Theory of Political Economy, Londonet al.: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kirzner, I. (1997), ‘Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach’, Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1): 6085.Google Scholar
Menger, C. ([1871](2007)), Principles of Economics (J. Dingwall and B. F. Hoselitz Trans.), Auburn, AL: Mises Institute.Google Scholar
Menger, C. ([1883](1985)), Investigations into the Method of the Social Sciences with Special Reference to Economics (Nock, F. J. Trans.), New Yorket al.: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Menger, C. (1888a), ‘Zur Theorie des Kapitals’, Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 17: 149.Google Scholar
Menger, C. (1888b), ‘Contribution à la Théorie du Capital’, Revue d’Économie Politique, 2(6): 577594.Google Scholar
Menger, C. (2007), ‘Sobre la Theoría del Capital’, Procesos de Mercado. Revista Europea de Economía Política, 4(1): 177228.Google Scholar
Mises, L. (1949), Human Action – A Treatise on Economics, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Petrzak, Y. (2020), ‘An Outline of Carl Menger's Capital Theory 1867–1888,' Conference paper presented on Febr. 22nd, 2020, at the Austrian Student Scholars Conference 2020 at Grove City College.Google Scholar
Samuels, W. J. (1989), ‘Austrian and Institutional Economics: Some Common Elements’, Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 6: 5371.Google Scholar
Sombart, W. (1919), Der Moderne Kapitalismus, Vol. 2.1. München and Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. J. (1937), ‘The Economics of Carl Menger,’ Journal of Political Economy, 45(2): 229250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walras, L. ([1874](1954)), Elements of Pure Economics or the Theory of Social Wealth (Jaffé, W. Trans.), London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Wynarczyk, P. (1992), ‘Comparing Alleged Incommensurables: Institutional and Austrian Economics as Rivals and Possible Complements?’, Review of Political Economy, 4(1): 1836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar