Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-20T22:02:33.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond foraging: behavioral science and the future of institutional economics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2007

ALEXANDER J. FIELD
ALEXANDER J. FIELD*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Santa Clara University
*
*Correspondence to: Department of Economics, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA 95053. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Institutions affect economic outcomes, but variation in them cannot be directly linked to environmental factors such as geography, climate, or technological availabilities. Game theoretic approaches, based as they typically are on foraging only assumptions, do not provide an adequate foundation for understanding the intervening role of politics and ideology; nor does the view that culture and institutions are entirely socially constructed. Understanding what institutions are and how they influence behavior requires an approach that is in part biological, focusing on cognitive and behavioral adaptations for social interaction favored in the past by group selection. These adaptations, along with their effects on canalizing social learning, help to explain uniformities in political and social order, and are the bedrock upon which we build cultural and institutional variability.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , December 2007 , pp. 265 - 291
Copyright
Copyright © The JOIE Foundation 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, Daren, Johnson, Simon, and Robinson, James 2001, ‘The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development’, American Economic Review, 91 (December): 1369–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alford, John and Hibbing, John 2004, ‘The Origin of Politics: An Evolutionary Theory of Political Behavior’, Perspectives on Politics, 2 (December): 707–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alford, John, Funk, Carolyn, and Hibbing, John 2005, ‘Are Political Orientations Genetically Transmitted?’, American Political Science Review, 99 (May): 154–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atran, Scott 1990, Cognitive Foundations of Natural History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barkow, Jerome, Leda, Cosmides, and John, Tooby 1992, The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendor, Jonathan and Swistak, Piotr 1997, ‘The Evolutionary Stability of Cooperation’, American Political Science Review, 91: 290–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., and McCabe, K. 1995, ‘Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History’, Games and Economic Behavior, 10: 122–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binmore, Ken 1994, Game Theory and the Social Contract I: Playing Fair, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Boehm, Chritopher 1999, Hierarchy in the Forest: The Evolution of Egalitarian Behavior, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, T. J. Jr. and McGue, M. 2003, ‘Genetic and Environmental Influences on Human Psychological Differences’, Journal of Neurobiology, 54: 4–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyd, Robert and Richerson, Peter 2004, Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boyer, Pascal 2001, Religion Explained, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Camerer, Colin 2003, Behavioral Game Theory, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cosmides, Leda and Tooby, John 1992, ‘Cognitive Adaptations for Social Exchange’, in Barkow et al. (1992), pp. 163–228.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel 2006, Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon, New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Falk, Armin, Fehr, Ernst, and Fischbacher, Urs 2003, ‘Reasons for Conflict: Lessons from Bargaining Experiments’, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 159, 171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, Ernst, Fischbacker, Urs, and Kosfeld, Michael 2005, ‘Neuroeconomic Foundations of Trust and Social Preferences’, American Economic Review, 95 (May): 346–351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Field, Alexander J. 1981, ‘The Problem with the New Institutional Economics: A Critique with Special Reference to the North–Thomas Model of pre-1500 Europe’, Explorations in Economic History, 18 (April): 174–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, Alexander J. 1984, ‘Microeconomics, Norms, and Rationality’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 32 (July): 683–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, Alexander J. 1991. ‘Do Legal Systems Matter?’, Explorations in Economic History, 28 (January): 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, Alexander J. 2001, Altruistically Inclined? The Behavioral Sciences, Evolutionary Theory, and the Origins of Reciprocity, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Field, Alexander J. 2003, ‘The Most Technologically Progressive Decade of the Century’, American Economic Review, 93 (September): 1399–1414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, Alexander J. 2005, ‘Review article on Foundations of Human Sociality: Economic Experiments and Ethnographic Evidence from Fifteen Small Scale Societies’, Quarterly Review of Biology, 80 (December): 453–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, Alexander J. 2006a, ‘Group Selection and Behavioral Economics’, in Altman, Morris (ed.), Foundations and Extensions of Behavioral Economics: A Handbook, New York: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 165–182.Google Scholar
Field, Alexander J. 2006b, ‘Technological Change and US Economic Growth during the Interwar Years’, Journal of Economic History, 66 (March): 203–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, Alexander J. 2007. ‘Why Multilevel Selection Matters’, Journal of Bioeconomics, 9 (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Frank, Robert 1988, Passions within Reasons: The Strategic used Emotions, New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund 1962, Civilization and its Discontents, New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford 1973, The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gintis, Herbert 2000, Game Theory Evolving, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Glaeser, Edward L., Porta, Rafael de la, Lopez di Silanes, Florencio, and Shleifer, Andrei 2005, ‘Do Institutions Cause Growth?’, NBER Working Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaeser, Edward L., Laibson, David I., Scheinkman, Jose A., and Soutter, Christine L. 2000, ‘Measuring Trust’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115 (August): 811–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golding, William 1962, Lord of the Flies, New York: Coward-McCann.Google Scholar
Greif, Avner 2006, Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Robert E. and Jones, Charles 1999, ‘Why do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output per Worker than Others?’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114 (February): 83–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, Gilbert 1998, ‘Moral Philosophy and Linguistics’, in Fodor, J., Keyser, J., and Brand, A. (eds), Celebration: An Electronic Festschrift in Honor of Noam Chomsky, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich 1988, The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, Joseph, Robert, Boyd, Samuel, Bowles, Colin, Camerer, Ernst, Fehr, and Herbert, Gintis 2004, Foundations of Human Sociality: Economic Experiments and Ethnographic Evidence from Fifteen Small-Scale Societies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxley, Thomas 1902, Evolution and Ethics, and other Essays, New York: D. Appleton and Co.Google Scholar
Kuran, Timur 1995, Private Truths, Public Lies, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
LeDoux, Joseph 1996, The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life, New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Mathews, R.C.O. 1986, ‘The Economics of Institutions and the Sources of Economic Growth’, Economic Journal, 96: 903–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, Maynard Smith and Szathmany, Eors 1995, The Major Transitions in Evolutions, Oxford: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
McDermott, Rose 2004, ‘The Feeling of Rationality: The Meaning of Neuroscience for Political Science’, Perspectives on Politics, 2 (December): 691–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1981, Structure and Change in Economic History, New York: Norton & Co.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. and Robert, Paul Thomas 1973, The Rise of the Western World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Talcott 1937, The Structure of Social Action, New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven 2002, How the Mind Works: The Modern Denial of Human Nature, New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Poundstone, William 1992, Prisoner's Dilemma, New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Rabin, Mathew 1993, ‘Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics’, American Economic Review, 83 (December): 1281–1302.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, Ariel 2001, ‘A Theorist's View of Experiments’, European Economic Review, 45 (May): 615–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, Larry 2005, ‘Foundations of Human Sociality: A Review Essay’, Journal of Economic Literature, 43 (June): 488–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Herbert 1955, ‘A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69: 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, Elliott and Wilson, David Sloan 1998, Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sterelny, Kim 2003, Thought in a Hostile World: The Evolution of Human Cognition, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri and Billig, Michael 1974, ‘Familiarity and Categorization in Intergroup Behavior’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10: 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taleb, Nassim 2005, Fooled by Randomness: The Hidden Role of Change in Life and in the Markets, New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Trivers, Robert 1971, ‘The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism’, Quarterly Review of Biology, 46: 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, George C. 1966, Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver 2000, ‘The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead’, Journal of Economic Literature, 38: 595–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, David Sloan 2006, ‘Human Groups as Adaptive Units: Toward a Permanent Consensus’, in Carruthers, P., Laurence, S., and Stich, S. (eds), The Innate Mind: Culture and Cognition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, David Sloan and Sober, Elliott 1994, ‘Reintroducing Group Selection to the Human Behavioral Sciences’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17: 585–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, David Sloan and Wilson, Edward O. 2008, ‘Rethinking the Theoretical Foundation of Sociobiology’, Quarterly Review of Biology.Google Scholar
Wright, Sewall 1995, ‘Tempo and Mode in Evolution’, Ecology, 26: 415–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar