Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-22T08:47:45.258Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are institutional transplants viable? An examination in light of the proposals by Jeremy Bentham

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2012

JUAN PABLO COUYOUMDJIAN
JUAN PABLO COUYOUMDJIAN*
Affiliation:
Facultad de Gobierno & Facultad de Economía y Negocios, Universidad del Desarrollo, Av. Plaza 680, Santiago, Chile
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

The problem of institutional transplantation is an important issue. In Jeremy Bentham's work, we find practical as well as theoretical proposals regarding this problem. Here, we view his work as an invitation to reflect on the overall nature of the question of institutional design and transplantation. The transfer of institutions requires knowledge of ‘place and time’ that will allow for an accommodation of the transferred institutions to their new soil. However, an awareness of this type of knowledge and thus relying on its actually being available is not viable from a practical point of view. This is due to the fact that the core of informal institutions is tacit, which imposes a fundamental constraint on the process of institutional transplantation; informal norms must co-exist with formal rules, and such merging requires some accommodation of both types of rules.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 489 - 509
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bahmueller, C. (1981), The National Charity Company: Jeremy Bentham's Silent Revolution, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bello, A. (1848)/1981), ‘Constituciones’, in Obras Completas de Andrés Bello, vol. 23, Caracas, Venezuela: Fundación La Casa de Bello, pp. 253–261.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (1838), ‘A General View of a Complete Code of Laws’, in Bowring, J. (ed.), The Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol. 3, Edinburgh, UK: William Tait, pp. 155–210.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (1962), ‘Of the Influence of Time and Place in Matters of Legislation’, in Bowring, J. (ed.), The Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol. 1, New York: Russell & Russell, pp. 170–194.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (1983a). Deontology Together with a Table of the Springs of Action and the Article on Utilitarianism, Goldworth, A. (ed.), The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham, Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (1830)/1983b). Constitutional Code, Volume 1, Rosen, F. and Burns, J. H. (eds.), The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham, Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (1989). First Principles Preparatory to Constitutional Code, Schofield, P. (ed.), The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham, Oxford UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (1789)/1996), An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, Burns, J. H. and Hart, H. L. A. (eds.), with a new Introduction by F. Rosen, The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham, Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (1998), Legislator of the World: Writings on Codification, Law and Education, Schofield, P. and Harris, J. (eds.), The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham, Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (2011), ‘Place and Time’, in Engelmann, S. G. (ed.), Selected Writings: Jeremy Bentham, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 152–219.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, D., Pistor, K., and Richard, J.-F. (2003), ‘The Transplant Effect’, The American Journal of Comparative Law, 51 (1): 163–203.Google Scholar
Boettke, P. J., Coyne, C., and Leeson, P. T. (2008), ‘Institutional Stickiness and the New Development Economics’, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 67 (2): 331–358.Google Scholar
Carlyle, T. (1829)/1885), ‘Signs of the Times’, in Critical and Miscellaneous Essays (a new edition complete in one volume), New York: D. Appleton, pp. 187–196.Google Scholar
Chwe, M. S.-Y. (2003), Rational Ritual: Culture, Coordination, and Common Knowledge, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Conway, S. (1990), ‘Bentham and the Nineteenth-Century Revolution in Government’, in Bellamy, R. (ed.), Victorian Liberalism: Nineteenth-Century Political Thought and Practice, London: Routledge, pp. 71–90.Google Scholar
Couyoumdjian, J. P. (2008), ‘An Expert at Work: Revisiting Jeremy Bentham's Proposals on Codification’, Kyklos, 61 (4): 503–519.Google Scholar
David, R. and Brierley, J. E. C. (1978), Major Legal Systems in the World Today: An Introduction to the Comparative Study of Law, 2nd ed.New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
de Avila, A. (1979), ‘The Influence of Bentham in the Teaching of Penal Law in Chile’, The Bentham Newsletter, 5: 13–28.Google Scholar
de Jong, M., Lalenis, K., and Mamadouh, V. (eds.) (2002), The Theory and Practice of Institutional Transplantation: Experiences with the Transfer of Policy Institutions, Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Denzau, A. T. and North, D. C. (1994), ‘Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions’, Kyklos, 47 (1): 3–31.Google Scholar
Dinwiddy, J. R. (1989), Bentham, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dinwiddy, J. R. (1978)/1992), ‘Bentham and the Early Nineteenth Century’, in Radicalism and Reform in Britain, 1780–1850 (reprinted), London: The Hambledon Press, pp. 291–313.Google Scholar
Djankov, S., Glaeser, E., Porta, R. La, Lopez-de-Silanes, F., and Shleifer, A. (2003), ‘The New Comparative Economics’, Journal of Comparative Economics, 31 (4): 595–619.Google Scholar
Dumont, Étienne (1802), Traités de législation civile et pénale. Par M. Jérémie Bentham. Pub. en françois, par Ét. Dumont, Paris: Bossange, Masson et Besson.Google Scholar
Ellickson, R. C. (1991), Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, P. (2004), ‘Development as Institutional Change: The Pitfalls of Monocropping and the Potentials of Deliberation’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 38 (4): 30–52.Google Scholar
Finer, S. E. (1972), ‘The transmission of Benthamite ideas 1820–1850’, in Sutherland, G. (ed.), Studies in the Growth of Nineteenth-Century Government, Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 11–32.Google Scholar
Glendon, M. A., Carozza, P. G., and Picker, C. B. (2008), Comparative Legal Traditions in a Nutshell, 3rd ed.St.Paul, MN: Thomson West.Google Scholar
Grajzl, P. and Dimitrova-Grajzl, V. (2009), ‘The Choice in the Lawmaking Process: Legal Transplants vs. Indigenous Law’, Review of Law & Economics, 5 (1): article 26. Available at: http://www.bepress.com/rle/vol5/iss1/art26 (accessed 1 March 2012).Google Scholar
Halévy, E. (1928)/1955), The Growth of Philosophical Radicalism (Mary Morris, trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Halperín Donghi, T. (1973), The Aftermath of Revolutions in Latin America (Josephine de Bunsen, trans.). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. B. (1964) (ed.), The Transfer of Institutions, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Hardin, R. (1989), ‘Why a Constitution?’, in Grofman, B. and Wittman, D. (eds.), The Federalist Papers and New Institutionalism, New York: Agathon Press, pp. 100–120.Google Scholar
Harris, J. (1998), ‘Bernardino Rivadavia and Benthamite “Discipleship”’, Latin American Research Review, 33 (1): 129–149.Google Scholar
Harrison, R. (1983), Bentham, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1945), ‘The Use of Knowledge in Society’, The American Economic Review, XXXV (4): 519–530.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1960), The Constitution of Liberty, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1967), ‘Rules, Perception and Intelligibility’, in Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 43–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1973)–1979), Law, Legislation and Liberty, 3 volumes, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hume, L. J. (1981), Bentham and Bureaucracy, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jaksić, I. (2001), Andrés Bello: Scholarship and Nation-Building in Nineteenth-Century Latin America, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kingston, C. and Caballero, G. (2009), ‘Comparing Theories of Institutional Change’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 5 (2): 151–180.Google Scholar
Knack, S. and Keefer, P. (1995), ‘Institutions and Economic Performance: Cross-Country Tests Using Alternative Institutional Measures’, Economics and Politics, 7 (3): 207–227.Google Scholar
Legrand, P. (1997), ‘The Impossibility of Legal Transplants’, Maastricht Journal of European & Comparative Law, 4 (2): 111–124.Google Scholar
Loveman, B. (1993), The Constitution of Tyranny: Regimes of Exception in Spanish America, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. (2003), ‘Long-Run Development and the Legacy of Colonialism in Spanish America’, American Journal of Sociology, 109 (1): 50–106.Google Scholar
McKennan, T. (1981), ‘Benthamism in Santander's Colombia’, The Bentham Newsletter, 5: 29–43.Google Scholar
Menger, C. (1883)/1996), Investigations into the Method of the Social Sciences, Grove City, PA: Libertarian Press.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1969), ‘Bentham (1838)’, in Robson, J. M. (ed.) Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society, Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. 10, Toronto, Ontario: University of Toronto Press, pp. 75–115.Google Scholar
Morse, R. (1964), ‘The Heritage of Latin America’, in Hartz, L. (ed.), The Founding of New Societies: Studies in the History of the United States, Latin America, South Africa, Canada, and Australia, New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, pp. 123–177.Google Scholar
Mukand, S. W. and Rodrik, D. (2005), ‘In Search of the Holy Grail: Policy Convergence, Experimentation, and Economic Performance’, The American Economic Review, 95 (1): 374–383.Google Scholar
North, D. C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
North, D. C. (2005), Understanding the Process of Economic Change, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ordeshook, P. (1992), ‘Constitutional Stability’, Constitutional Political Economy, 3 (2): 137–175.Google Scholar
Ordeshook, P. (2002), ‘Are “Western” Constitutions Relevant to Anything Other than the Countries they Serve?’, Constitutional Political Economy, 13 (1): 3–24.Google Scholar
Peardon, T. P. (1951)/1993), ‘Bentham's Ideal Republic’, in Parekh, B. (ed.), Jeremy Bentham: Critical Assessments, vol. 3 (reprinted), London: Routledge, pp. 621–644.Google Scholar
Platteau, J.-P. (2000), Institutions, Social Norms and Economic Development, London: Harwood.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1958), Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1966)/1983), The Tacit Dimension, Gloucester, UK: Peter Smith.Google Scholar
Roberts, D. (1959)/1993), ‘Jeremy Bentham and the Victorian Administrative State’, in Parekh, B. (ed.), Jeremy Bentham: Critical Assessments, vol. 3 (reprinted), London: Routledge, pp. 879–894.Google Scholar
Rodrik, D. (2000), ‘Institutions for High-Quality Growth: What They Are and How to Acquire Them’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 35 (3): 3–31.Google Scholar
Roland, G. (2004), ‘Understanding Institutional Change: Fast-Moving and Slow-Moving Institutions’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 38 (4): 109–131.Google Scholar
Rosen, F. (1983), Jeremy Bentham and Representative Democracy: A Study of the Constitutional Code, Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Runst, P. and Wagner, R. E. (2011), ‘Choice, Emergence, and Constitutional Process: A Framework for Positive Analysis’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 7 (1): 131–141.Google Scholar
Safford, F. (1985), ‘Politics, Ideology and Society in Post-Independence Spanish America’, in Bethell, L. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Latin America, vol. III, From Independence to c.1870, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 347–421.Google Scholar
Schelling, T. C. (1960), The Strategy of Conflict, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schleifer, J. T. (2000), The Making of Tocqueville's Democracy in America, 2nd ed., Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, http://oll.libertyfund.org/title/667/67117 (accessed 1 March 2012).Google Scholar
Schofield, P. ((1991)–1992), ‘The Constitutional Code of Jeremy Bentham’, King's College Law Journal, 2, 40–62.Google Scholar
Scott, J. (1998), Seeing like a State, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sugden, R. (1986), The Economics of Rights, Co-operation, and Welfare, Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Thomas, W. (1979), The Philosophic Radicals: Nine Studies in Theory and Practice 1817–1841, Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, A. de (1835)/1990), Democracy in America, vol. 1, New York: Vintage Classics.Google Scholar
Véliz, C. (1980), The Centralist Tradition in Latin America, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, A. (1993), Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law, 2nd. ed., Athens, Greece: The University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. (2000), ‘The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead’, Journal of Economic Literature, XXXVIII (3): 595–613.Google Scholar
Williford, M. (1980), Jeremy Bentham on Spanish America: An Account of His Letters and Proposals to the New World, Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Young, H. P. (1996), ‘The Economics of Convention’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10 (2), 105–122.Google Scholar
Zweynert, J. (2009), ‘Interests versus Culture in the Theory of Institutional Change’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 5 (3), 339–360.Google Scholar
Zweynert, J. and Goldschmidt, N. (2006), ‘The Two Transitions in Central and Eastern Europe as Processes of Institutional Transplantation’, Journal of Economic Issues, XL (4): 895–918.Google Scholar