Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T00:05:05.994Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why are cooperatives important in agriculture? An organizational economics perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2007

VLADISLAV VALENTINOV
VLADISLAV VALENTINOV*
Affiliation:
Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Central and Eastern Europe, Halle, Germany
*
*Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Central and Eastern Europe, Theodor-Lieser-Strasse 2, 06120 Halle, Germany. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

This paper develops an organizational economics explanation for agricultural cooperatives by building upon the transaction cost theory of family farms. According to this theory, the importance of family farms in Western agriculture is a result of the low feasibility of hierarchical organization in agricultural production due to supervision and monitoring difficulties. This paper argues that the transaction cost-economizing effect of family farms has a price in the form of their limited ability to realize economies of scale and to develop market power comparable to that of their up- and downstream trading partners. The role of agricultural cooperatives is shown to help overcome these limitations in order to take advantage of the transaction-cost economizing properties of family farms. This explanation of agricultural cooperatives is sector-specific in the sense that it traces the benefits of cooperative organization back to the organizational attributes of agricultural production.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , April 2007 , pp. 55 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © The JOIE Foundation 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research has been supported by Marie Curie Incoming International Fellowship of the Sixth Framework Program of the European Community (Contract No. MIF1-CT-2005-514036). The European Commission is not liable for any use that may be made of this publication. The author is grateful to Geoffrey M. Hodgson and two anonymous referees for helpful comments.

References

Ben-Ner, Avner 1984, ‘On the Stability of the Cooperative Type of Organization’, Journal of Comparative Economics, 8 (3): 247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Ner, Avner 1987, ‘Producer Cooperatives: Why Do They Exist in Capitalist Economies?’, in Powell, Walter W. (ed.), The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Binswanger, Hans and Rosenzweig, Mark 1986, ‘Behavioral and Material Determinants of Production Relations in Agriculture’, Journal of Development Studies, 22: 503–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonus, Holger 1986, ‘The Cooperative Association as a Business Enterprise: A Study in the Economics of Transactions’, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 142: 310–339.Google Scholar
Buccirossi, Paolo, Marette, Stephan, and Schiavina, Alessandra 2002, ‘Competition Policy and the Agribusiness Sector in the European Union’, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 29 (3): 373–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaddad, Fabio and Cook, Michael 2004, ‘Understanding New Cooperative Models: An Ownership-Control Rights Typology’, Review of Agricultural Economics, 26 (3): 348–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, Ronald 1937, ‘The Nature of the Firm’,Economica, 4: 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Michael 1995, ‘The Future of US Agricultural Cooperatives: A Neo-institutional Approach’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77: 1153–1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Michael and Iliopoulos, Constantine 2000, ‘Ill-defined Property Rights in Collective Action: the Case of Agricultural Cooperatives’, in Ménard, Claude (ed.), Institutions, Contracts, and Organizations: Perspectives from New Institutional Economics, London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Fama, Eugene and Jensen, Michael 1983, ‘Separation of Ownership and Control’, Journal of Law and Economics, 26: 301–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, Eugene and Jensen, Michael 1985, ‘Organizational Forms and Investment Decisions’, Journal of Financial Economics, 14: 101–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansmann, Henry 1988, ‘Ownership of the Firm’, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 4 (2): 267–304.Google Scholar
Hansmann, Henry 1996, The Ownership of Enterprise, Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Harkin, Thomas 2004, ‘Economic Concentration and Structural Change in the Food and Agriculture Sector: Trends, Consequences and Policy Options’, US Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition & Forestry White Paper, on Internet: http://harkin.senate.gov/agriculture/CommStaffConcentrationPaper.pdf. Accessed on 10.03.2006.Google Scholar
Harris, Milton and Raviv, Artur 1979, ‘Optimal Incentive Contracts with Imperfect Information’, Journal of Economic Theory, 20: 231–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hathaway, Dale 1963, Government and Agriculture: Public Policy in a Democratic Society, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Heffernan, William 1999, ‘Consolidation in the Food and Agriculture System’, Report to the National Farmers Union, on Internet: http://www.foodcircles.missouri.edu/whstudy.pdf. Accessed on 10.03.2006.Google Scholar
Jensen, Michael and Meckling, William 1976, ‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure’, Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Michael and Meckling, William 1979, ‘Rights and Production Functions: An Application to Labor-Managed Firms and Codetermination’, Journal of Business, 52: 469–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Nancy and Ruttan, Vernon 1994, ‘Why Are Farms So Small?’, World Development, 22 (5): 691–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menard, Claude 2004, ‘The Economics of Hybrid Organizations’, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 160: 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollak, Robert 1985, ‘A Transaction Cost Approach to Families and Households’, Journal of Economic Literature, 23: 581–608.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert 1993, Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Putterman, Louis 1982, ‘Some Behavioral Perspectives on the Dominance of Hierarchical over Democratic Forms of Enterprise’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3: 139–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Guenter 1991, ‘Why Is the Agriculture of Advanced Western Economies Still Organized by Family Farms? Will This Continue To Be So in the Future?’, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 18: 443–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Guenter 1993a, ‘Why Collectivization of Agriculture in Socialist Countries has Failed: A Transaction Cost Approach’, in Csaki, Csaba, and Kislev, Yoav (eds), Agricultural Cooperatives in Transition, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Guenter 1993b, Über die Besonderheiten der landwirtschaftlichen Produktion: das ‘Wesen’ und die Zukunft des landwirtschaftlichen Betriebes, Institut für Agrarökonomie der Universität Göttingen, Diskussionsbeitrag 9307.Google Scholar
Seitz, Wesley, Nelson, Gerald, and Halcrow, Harold 1994, Economics of Resources, Agriculture, and Food, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Sporleder, Thomas 1992 ‘Managerial Economics of Vertically Coordinated Agricultural Firms’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 74: 1226–1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staatz, John 1987, ‘Farmers’ Incentives to Take Collective Action via Cooperatives: A Transaction Cost Approach’, in Royer, Jeffrey (ed.), Cooperative Theory: New Approaches, Agricultural Cooperative Service, Service Report 18, Washington, DC: USDA.Google Scholar
Staatz, John 1989, Farmer Cooperative Theory: Recent Developments, Agricultural Cooperative Service, Research Report 84, Washington, DC: USDA.Google Scholar
Sykuta, Michael and Cook, Michael 2001, ‘Cooperative and Membership Commitment: A New Institutional Economics Approach to Contracts and Cooperatives’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83: 1273–1279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
USDA 2002, Agricultural cooperatives in the 21st century, Agricultural Cooperative Service, Cooperative Information Report 60, Washington, DC: USDA.Google Scholar
Vitaliano, Peter 1983, ‘Cooperative Enterprise: Alternative Conceptual Bases for Analyzing a Complex Institution’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65: 1078–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Oliver 1975, Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver 1985, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver 1991, ‘Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 269–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Oliver 1996, The Mechanisms of Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar