Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-9nwgx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-23T05:14:15.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A social-leverage mechanism on the Silk Road: the private emergence of institutions in central Asia, from the 7th to the 9th century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2016

YANLONG ZHANG  and
WOLFRAM ELSNER
YANLONG ZHANG*
Affiliation:
Institute of Economics, Tsinghua University, Peking, China
WOLFRAM ELSNER*
Affiliation:
iino–Institute of Institutional and Innovation Economics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
*
*Email: [email protected]
**Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We explain archaeological evidence of Sogdian merchants in central Asia in early medieval, remote long-distance trade on the emerging Silk Road. In fact, it began as barter, but was based on the social organization that Sogdians developed in their communities when migrating east. Their particular way of generating trust and institutionalized cooperation was by social leverage, involving third parties as contract witnesses and/or guarantors. These usually had own commercial relations with the contractors, facilitating crediting and exchange – and credible threat to defectors. While Greif (1989) had been criticized for overlooking courts in the Maghribi case, we discuss a differentiated (latent) role for courts. We also discuss property rights versus possession, transactions costs and price implications. We analyze the mechanism in historical cases and game-theoretical reconstructions, and explain trade flourishing under strong uncertainty.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 2017 , pp. 379 - 400
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Axelrod, R. (2006), The Evolution of Cooperation, New York, USA: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Barbara, D. (2016), ‘Tit-for-tat in Trade Policies: Nothing but a Fest for Vested Interests?’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 12 (1): 217–239.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1990), Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dohi, T. (1988), ‘On the Dunhuang Chinese Fragments Concerning the Hang Uighur Trade’, in Papers in Honour of Professor M. Kuriharaon his 70th birthday, Tokyo, pp. 399–436 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
Elisseeff, V. (2000), The Silk Roads: Highways of Culture and Commerce, New York, USA: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Elsner, W. and Heinrich, T. (2009), ‘A Simple Theory of ‘Meso’. On the Co-evolution of Institutions and Platform Size. With an Application to Varieties of Capitalism and ‘Medium-sized’ Countries’, Journal of Social-Economics, 38 (5): 843–858.Google Scholar
Elsner, W. and Schwardt, H. (2014), ‘Trust and Arena Size: Expectations, Institutions, and General Trust, and Critical Population and Group Sizes’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 10 (1): 107–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, L. (2001), ‘Sogdians in Northwest China’, in Juliano, A. L. and Lerner, J. A. (eds.), Monks and Merchants. Silk Road Treasures from Northern China. Gansu and Ningxia 4th-7th Century, New York: H.N. Abrams & Asia Society, pp. 239–245.Google Scholar
Frank, R. H. (1987), ‘If Homo Economics Could Choose His Own Utility Function, Would He want one with Conscience?’, American Economic Review, 77 (4): 593–604.Google Scholar
Gernet, J. (1957), ‘La vente en Chine d'après les contrâts de Touen-Houang, (IXe-Xe siècles)’, T'oung Pao, 45 (4/5): 295–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goitein, S. D. (1988), A Mediterranean Society: The Jewish Communities of the Arab World as Portrayed in the Documents of the Cairo Geniza, Vol. V: The Individual, Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Greif, A. (1989), ‘Reputation and Coalitions in Medieval Trade: Evidence on the Maghribi Traders’, The Journal of Economic History, 49 (4): 857–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greif, A., Milgrom, P., and Weingast, B. R. (1994), ‘Coordination, Commitment, and Enforcement: The Case of the Merchant Guild’, Journal of Political Economy, 102 (4): 745–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greif, A. and Mokyr, J. (2016), ‘Institutions and Economic History: A Critique of Professor McCloskey’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 12 (1): 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grenet, F. (2007), ‘Religious Diversity among Sogdian Merchants in Sixth-Century China: Zoroastrianism, Buddhism, Manichaeism, and Hinduism’, Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 27 (2): 463–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, V. (1995), Negotiating Daily Life in Traditional China: How Ordinary People Used Contracts, 600-1400, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, V. (2003), ‘New Work on the Sogdians, the Most Important Traders on the Silk Road, A.D. 500-1000’, T'oung Pao, 89 (1): 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, V. (2005), ‘How Business Was Conducted on the Chinese Silk Road During the Tang Dynasty, 618-907’, in Goetzmann, W. N. and Rouwenhorst, K. G. (eds.), The Origins of Value, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 43–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, V. (2010), The Impact of the Silk Road Trade on a Local Community: The Turfan Oasis, 500-800, New Haven: Yale University Press. http://history.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/hansen-silk-road-trade.pdf. Retrieved 2016-07-23.Google Scholar
Hardin, R. (2006), Trust: Key Concepts, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Henning, W. B. (1948), ‘The Date of the Sogdian Ancient Letters’, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 12 (3–4): 601–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, G. (2002), How Economics Forgot History: The Problem of Historical Specificity in Social Science, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. (2005), ‘Much of the ‘economics of property rights’ devalues property and legal rights’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 11 (4): 683–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikeda, O. (1981), ‘Les Marchands Sogdiens Dans Les Documents de Dunhuang et de Turfan’, Journal Asiatique, 269 (1): 77–79.Google Scholar
James, H. S. (2002), ‘The Trust Paradox: A Survey of Economic Inquiries into the Nature of Trust and Trustworthiness’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 47 (3): 291–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, B. (1994), Dunhuang Tulufan Wenshu yu Sichou zhi lu (In Chinese alphabetic writing) (Documents from Dunhuang and Turfan about the Silk Road), Peking, China: Wenwu Chubanshe Press.Google Scholar
MacCormack, G. (1985), ‘The Law of Contract in China under the Tang and Sung Dynasties’, Revue Internationale des Droits de L'antiquité, 32 (7): 17–68.Google Scholar
Macneil, I. R. (1980), The New Social Contract, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Milgrom, P. R., North, D. C., and Weingast, B. R. (1990), ‘The Role of Institutions in the Revival of Trade: The Law Merchant, Private Judges, and the Champagne Fairs’, Economics and Politics, 2 (1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. C. (1981), Structure and Change in Economic History, New York, USA: Norton.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, E. G. (1955), The Background of the Rebellion of An Lu-Shan, Oxford: University of Oxford Press.Google Scholar
Rong, X. (1999), ‘Beichao Sui Tang Sute Ren de Qianxi ji qi Juluo (In Chinese Alphabetic Writing) (The Sogdian Migration and Colonies in pre-Tang and Tang China)’, in Xingyuan, L. (ed.), Guoxue Yanjiu, Peking: Peking University Press, vol. 6, pp. 27–86.Google Scholar
Rose, J. (2010), ‘The Sogdians: Prime Movers between Boundaries’, Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 30 (3): 410–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims-Williams, N. (1996), ‘The Sogdian Merchants in China and India’, in Cadonna, A. and Lanciotti, L. (eds.), Cina e Iran da Alessandro Magno alla Dinastia Tang, Florence: Leo S. Olschki Editore, pp. 51–52.Google Scholar
Skaff, J. K. (2003), ‘The Sogdian Trade Diaspora in East Turkestan during the Seventh and Eighth Centuries’, Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, 46 (4): 475–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaissière, E. D. L. (2005), Sogdian Traders: a History, Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamamoto, T. and Ikeda, O. (1987), Tun-huang and Turfan Documents, Tokyo: Toyo Bunko.Google Scholar