Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:18:42.555Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Riding in cars with boys: Elinor Ostrom's adventures with the police

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2013

PETER BOETTKE ,
LIYA PALAGASHVILI  and
JAYME LEMKE
PETER BOETTKE*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA
LIYA PALAGASHVILI*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA
JAYME LEMKE*
Affiliation:
Political Theory Project, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
*
*Email: [email protected]
***Email: [email protected]
**Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

More than 40 years ago, Elinor Ostrom began her adventures with the police. In order to combat the conventional view that ‘bigger means better’, Ostrom pioneered a fieldwork-based framework for measuring police services that utilized consumer surveys and thereby created a community-centered model of analysis for public services. In this paper, we contend that although Ostrom's career demonstrated the importance of employing multiple methods, her most enduring contributions and legacy came from on-the-ground research. Her case studies and fieldwork proved to be necessary for examining complex systems beyond the state–market dichotomy, and these methods of analysis should be defended as critical for inquiry into the variety of institutional arrangements.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 9 , Issue 4: Elinor Ostrom Memorial Issue , December 2013 , pp. 407 - 425
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aligica, P. (forthcoming), Institutional Diversity, Pluralism, and Institutional Theory, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aligica, P. and Boettke, P. (2009), Challenging Institutional Analysis and Development: The Bloomington School, New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aligica, P. and Boettke, P. (2010), ‘Elinor Ostrom, 1933–2012’, in Durlauf, S. and Blume, L. (eds.), New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Online Edition, http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2010_O000109.Google Scholar
Aligica, P. and Boettke, P. (2011), ‘Two Social Philosophies of the Ostroms’ Institutionalism’, Policy Studies Journal, 39 (1): 29–49.Google Scholar
Boettke, P. (2010), ‘Is the Only Form of ‘Reasonable Regulation’ Self-Regulation? Lessons From Lin Ostrom on Regulating the Commons and Cultivating Citizens’, Public Choice, 143 (3–4): 283–291.Google Scholar
Boettke, P. and Coyne, C. (2005), ‘Methodological Individualism, Spontaneous Order and the Research Program of the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 57 (2): 145–158.Google Scholar
Boettke, P., Coyne, C., and Leeson, P. (2011), ‘Quasimarket Failure’, Public Choice, 149 (1–2): 209–224.Google Scholar
Chamlee-Wright, E (2010), The Cultural and Political Economy of Recovery, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Herzberg, R. and Allen, B. (2012), ‘Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012)’, Public Choice, 153 (3–4): 263–268.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. (2005), ‘Generalizing Darwinism to Social Evolution: Some Early Attempts,’ Journal of Economic Issues, 39 (4): 899–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishak, S. T. (1972), Consumers’ Perception of Police Performance: Consolidation vs. Deconcentration: The Case of Grand Rapids, Michigan Metropolitan Area, Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Kiser, L. and Ostrom, E. (1982), ‘Three Worlds of Action: A Metatheoretical Synthesis of Institutional Approaches’, in Ostrom, E. (ed.), Strategies of Political Inquiry, New York: Russell Sage, pp. 179–222.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1982), ‘Beyond Positivism’, in Ostrom, E. (ed.), Strategies of Political Inquiry, New York: Russell Sage, pp. 11–28.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1990), Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, V. (1997), The Meaning of Democracy and the Vulnerability of Democracies, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1998), ‘A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action’, The American Political Science Review, 92 (1): 1–22.Google Scholar
Ostrom, V. (1999a), ‘Polycentricity (Part One)’, in McGinnis, M. (ed.), Polycentricity and Local Public Economies, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, V (1999b), ‘Polycentricity (Part Two)’, in McGinnis, M. (ed.), Polycentricity and Local Public Economies, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2005), Understanding Institutional Diversity, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2006), ‘Converting Threats into Opportunities’, PS: Political Science and Politics, 40 (1): 3–12.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2009), ‘Elinor Ostrom – Biographical’, The Nobel Foundation. <http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/2009/ostrom.html> (accessed Decemebr 15, 2012).+(accessed+Decemebr+15,+2012).>Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2010), ‘Beyond Market and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems’, American Economic Review, 100: 641–672.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2011), ‘Honoring James Buchanan’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 80: 370–373.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. and Basurto, X. (2011), ‘Crafting Analytical Tools to Study Institutional Change’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 7: 317–343.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., Baugh, W., Gaurasci, R., Parks, R., and Whitaker, G. (1973a), Community Organization and the Provision of Police Services, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., Parks, R., and Whitaker, G. (1973b), ‘Do We Really Want to Consolidate Urban Police Forces? A Reappraisal of Some Old Assertions’, Public Administration Review, 33 (5): 423–432.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., Parks, R., and Whitaker, G. (1978), Patterns of Metropolitan Policing, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., Parks, R., Whitaker, G., and Percy, S. (1979), ‘The Public Service Production Process: A Framework for Analyzing Police Services’, in Baker, R. and Meyer, F. (eds.), Evaluating Alternative Law Enforcement Policies, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C., and Warren, R. (1961), ‘The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas’, American Political Science Review, 55: 831–842. Reprinted in Michael McGinnis (ed.), Polycentricity and Local Public Economies, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. and Whitaker, G. (1973), ‘Does Local Community Control of Police make a Difference?’, American Journal of Political Science, 17 (1): 48–76. Reprinted in Michael McGinnis, ed., Polycentricity and Local Public Economies, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. and Whitaker, G. (1974), ‘Community Control and Government Responsiveness: The Case of Police in Black Communities’, in Rogers, D. and Hawley, W. (eds.), Improving the Quality of Urban Management in Urban Affairs Annual Reviews, 8: 303–334, Beverly Hills, LA: Sage. Reprinted in Michael McGinnis, ed., Polycentricity and Local Public Economies, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1999Google Scholar
Ostrom, V. and Ostrom, E. (1977), ‘Public goods and public choices’, in Savas, E.S. (ed.), Alternatives for delivering public services: towards improved performance, pp. 7–49. Boulder, Westview Press.Google Scholar
Parks, R. (1979), Assessing the Influence or Organization on Performance: A Study of Police Services in Residential Neighborhoods, Ph.D. dissertation, Bloomington, Indiana University, Department of Political Science.Google Scholar
Parks, R. (1985), ‘Metropolitan Structure and Systemic Performance: The Case of Police Service Delivery’, in Hanf, K. and Toonen, T. (eds.), Policy Implementation in Federal and Unitary Systems, Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 161–191.Google Scholar
Poteete, A., Janssen, M., and Ostrom, E. (2010), Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, B. and Lipsey, C. M. (1974), ‘Metropolitan Reform: Citizen Evaluations of Performa-nces in Nashville-Davidson County, Tennessee’, Publius, 4: 19–34.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1990), ‘Invariants of Human Behavior’, Annual Review of Psychology, 41: 1–19.Google Scholar