Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:26:04.873Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Organizations matter: they are institutions, after all

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2010

JOHN LINARELLI*
Affiliation:
University of La Verne College of Law, Ontario California, United States
*

Abstract:

Judge Posner (2010) offers a substantial agenda for organization economics. He advises us on how organization economics can shed substantial light on some of the most pressing social problems of the day. I comment on two of the areas he selects for discussion and offer some comments on the relationship of organization economics to new institutional economics. Judge Posner surely is right to argue that organization economics can help us understand the failures of corporate governance in regulating executive pay. Moreover, with additional and more institutionally nuanced theorizing, organizational economics should further our understanding of the work of judiciaries in the civilian and common law traditions. Judge Posner tells us that organization economics and new institutional economics are related fields. I make a plea for economic holism. Organizations are institutions. While getting clear on disciplinary boundaries and the differing kinds and concepts of institutions is important, logical differences in concepts like ‘organization’ and ‘institution’ may be less important than what to emphasize in theory construction and what to test for with those theories. The success of organization economics will be in whether the different emphases produce new insights. Judge Posner is right to tell us that new insights are coming and will continue to come from organization economics. This is true however we conceptualize the field as a school of thought.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The JOIE Foundation 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bainbridge, S. M. (2008), The New Corporate Governance in Theory and Practice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Easterbrook, F. H. and Fischel, D. R. (1991), The Economic Structure of Corporate Law, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gordley, J. (2006), Foundations of Private Law: Property, Tort, and Unjust Enrichment, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hackney, J. (2007), Under Cover of Science: American Legal-Economic Theory and the Question for Objectivity, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2006), ‘What are institutions?’, Journal of Economic Issues, 40: 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLean, R. G. (1982), ‘Judicial discretion in the civil law’, Louisiana Law Review, 43: 4556.Google Scholar
Macy, J. R. (2008), Corporate Governance: Promises Kept, Promises Broken, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mattei, U. (1997), Comparative Law and Economics, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merryman, J. H. and Perez-Perdomo, R. (2007), The Civil Law Tradition; An Introduction to the Legal Systems or Europe and Latin America, 3rd edn, Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Posner, R. A. (1999), Overcoming Law, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Posner, R. A. (2001), Frontiers of Legal Theory, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Posner, R. A. (2007), Economic Analysis of Law, 7th edn, New York: Aspen.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. (2010), ‘From the new institutional economics to organization economics: with applications to corporate governance, government agencies, and legal institutions’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 6 (1): 137.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (2005), ‘What is an institution?’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 1: 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar