Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:12:03.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A machine-learning history of English caselaw and legal ideas prior to the Industrial Revolution I: generating and interpreting the estimates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2020

Peter Grajzl  and
Peter Murrell
Peter Grajzl
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, The Williams School of Commerce, Economics, and Politics, Washington and Lee University, Lexington, VA, USA CESifo, Munich, Germany
Peter Murrell*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD20742, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The history of England's institutions has long informed research on comparative economic development. Yet to date, there exists no quantitative evidence on a core aspect of England's institutional evolution, that embodied in the accumulated decisions of English courts. Focusing on the two centuries before the Industrial Revolution, we generate and analyze the first quantitative estimates of the development of English caselaw and its associated legal ideas. We achieve this in two companion papers. In this, the first of the pair, we build a comprehensive corpus of 52,949 reports of cases heard in England's high courts before 1765. Estimating a 100-topic structural topic model, we name and interpret all topics, each of which reflects a distinctive aspect of English legal thought. We produce time series of the estimated topic prevalences. To interpret the topic timelines, we develop a tractable model of the evolution of legal-cultural ideas and their prominence in case reports. In the companion paper, we will illustrate with multiple applications the usefulness of the large amount of new information generated by our approach.

Keywords

CaselawEnglish historyidea diffusioninstitutional developmentmachine learningC8N00K10Z10P10
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , February 2021 , pp. 1 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, D and Robinson, J. A. (2012), Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty, New York, NY: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
Baker, J. H. (1971a), ‘New Light on Slade's Case’, Cambridge Law Journal, 29(1): 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, J. H. (1971b), ‘New Light on Slade's Case’, Cambridge Law Journal, 29(2): 213–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, J. H. (2019), An Introduction to English Legal History, 5th edition, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaydes, L., Grimmer, J. and McQueen, A. (2018), ‘Mirrors for Princes and Sultans: Advice on the Art of Governance in the Medieval Christian and Islamic Worlds’, Journal of Politics, 80(4): 1150–1167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blei, D. M. (2012), ‘Probabilistic Topic Models’, Communications of the ACM, 55(4): 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y. and Jordan, M. I. (2003), ‘Latent Dirichlet Allocation’, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3(4/5): 993–1022Google Scholar
Coffman, D., Leonard, A. and Neal, L. (eds.) (2013). Questioning Credible Commitment: Perspectives on the Rise of Financial Capitalism, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (2011), The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Funk, K. and Mullen, L. A. (2018), ‘The Spine of American Law: Digital Text Analysis and U.S. Legal Practice’, The American Historical Review, 123(1): 132–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grajzl, P. and Murrell, P. (2019), ‘Toward Understanding 17th Century English Culture: A Structural Topic Model of Francis Bacon's Ideas’, Journal of Comparative Economics, 47(1): 111–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grajzl, P. and Murrell, P. (2020), ‘Characterizing a Legal-Intellectual Culture: Bacon, Coke, and Seventeenth – Century England’, Cliometrica, forthcoming. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11698-020-00202-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grajzl, P. and Murrell, P. (2021), ‘A Machine-Learning History of English Caselaw and Legal Ideas Prior to the Industrial Revolution II: Applications’, Journal of Institutional Economics, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Grimmer, J. and Stewart, B. M. (2013), ‘Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts’, Political Analysis, 21(3): 267–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, S., McMahon, M. and Prat, A. (2018), ‘Transparency and Deliberation Within the FOMC: A Computational Linguistics Approach’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2(1): 801–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1960), The Constitution of Liberty, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Henrich, J. (2001), ‘Cultural Transmission and the Diffusion of Innovations: Adoption Dynamics Indicate That Biased Cultural Transmission Is the Predominate Force in Behavioral Change’, American Anthropologist, 103(4): 992–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holden, J. M. (1955), The History of Negotiable Instruments in English Law, London: University of London.Google Scholar
Hoppit, J. (2017), Britain's Political Economies, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibbetson, D. (1984), ‘Sixteenth Century Contract Law: Slade's Case in Context’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 4(3): 295–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, D. S. (2016), ‘Constitutional Archetypes’, Texas Law Review, 95(2): 153–243.Google Scholar
Lieberman, D. (1989), The Province of Legislation Determined. Legal Theory in Eighteenth-Century Britain, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livermore, M. A. and Rockmore, D. N. (2019), Law as Data: Computation, Text, and the Future of Legal Analysis, Santa Fe, NM: The Santa Fe Institute Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livermore, M. A., Riddell, A. B. and Rockmore, D. N. (2017), ‘The Supreme Court and the Judicial Genre’, Arizona Law Review, 59(4): 837–901Google Scholar
Lobban, M. (1991), The Common Law and English Jurisprudence, 1760–1850, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mohr, J. W. and Bogdanov, P. (2013), ‘Introduction − Topic Models: What They Are and Why They Matter’, Poetics, 41(6): 545–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. C. and Weingast, B. (1989), ‘Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England’, Journal of Economic History, 49(4): 803–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, M. A. (2006), Evolutionary Dynamics: Exploring the Equations of Life, Kindle Edition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogilvie, S. and Carus, A. W. (2014), ‘Institutions and Economic Growth in Historical Perspective’, in Aghion, P., and Durlauf, S.N. (eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth (Vol. 2), Amsterdam, Elsevier, pp. 403–513.Google Scholar
Reich, J., Tingley, D., Leder-Luis, J., Roberts, M. E. and Stewart, B. M. (2015), ‘Computer-Assisted Reading and Discovery for Student-Generated Text in Massive Open Online Courses’, Journal of Learning Analytics, 2(1): 156–184.Google Scholar
Renton, A. W. (1900–1932), The English Reports, Great Britain, Parliament, House of Lords, Edinburgh, UK: W. Green & Sons.Google Scholar
Rice, D. (2019), ‘Measuring the Issue Content of Supreme Court Opinions’, Journal of Law and Courts, 7(1): 107–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M. and Airoldi, E. M. (2016), ‘A Model of Text for Experimentation in the Social Sciences’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 111(515): 988–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M. and Tingley, D. (2019), ‘stm: R Package for Structural Topic Models’, Journal of Statistical Software, 91(2): 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Kushner Gadarian, S., Albertson, B. and Rand, D. G. (2014), ‘Structural Topic Models for Open-Ended Survey Responses’, American Journal of Political Science, 58(4): 1064–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schama, S. (2003), A History of Britain: The British Wars, 1603–1776 (Vol. 2), New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Taddy, M. A. (2012), ‘On Estimation and Selection for Topic Models’, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp. 1184–1193.Google Scholar
Veeder, V. V. (1901), ‘The English Reports, 1292–1865’, Harvard Law Review, 15(1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voltaire, (1734), Letters on England, Kindle Edition. Edited by H. Morley. 1894 Edition by Cassell & Co. Salt Lake City, UT: Project Gutenberg.Google Scholar
Wallach, H. M., Murray, I., Salakhutdinov, R. and Mimno, D. (2009), ‘Evaluation Methods for Topic Models’, ICML ’09 Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1105–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winfield, P. H. (1925), The Chief Sources of English Legal History, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar