Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:44:15.802Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Linking alternative theories of the firm – a first empirical application to the liquefied natural gas industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2009

SOPHIA RUESTER  and
ANNE NEUMANN
SOPHIA RUESTER*
Affiliation:
Dresden University of Technology, Germany
ANNE NEUMANN
Affiliation:
Dresden University of Technology, Germany
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper provides an empirical analysis linking two theories of firms' strategic behavior. We analyze corporate strategies in the emerging global market for liquefied natural gas. First, following Porter, we identify three strategic target market positions: chain optimization, flexibility strategy, and national oil companies (NOCs). Each target market position is supported by an underlying resource profile. Second, following transaction cost economics, we hypothesize that specific investments under uncertainty provide incentives to integrate vertically. We test these economic relationships empirically applying a two-stage procedure. Estimation results show that the three strategic choices of target market position, resource profile, and organizational structure are interrelated. We show that NOCs rely on less idiosyncratic assets than companies following a flexibility strategy and companies following a flexibility strategy rely on less idiosyncratic assets than chain optimizers. An increase in hold-up potential results in a higher probability of a firm organizing transactions within its own hierarchy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , April 2009 , pp. 47 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © The JOIE Foundation 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., and Mitton, T. (2005), ‘Determinants of Vertical Integration: Finance, Contracts, and Regulation’, WP 11424, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argyres, N. (1996), ‘Evidence on the Role of Firm Capabilities in Vertical Integration Decisions’, Strategic Management Journal, 17 (2): 129–150.3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BP (2007), ‘Statistical Review of World Energy 2006’, London.Google Scholar
Coase, R. H. (1937), ‘The Nature of the Firm’, Economica, 4 (4): 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornot-Gandolphe, S. (2005), ‘LNG Cost Reductions and Flexibility in LNG Trade Add to Security of Gas Supply’, in IEA, Energy Prices and Taxes, Paris: IEA/OECD.Google Scholar
Day, G. S. and Klein, S. (1987), ‘Cooperative Behavior in Vertical Markets: The Influence of Transaction Costs and Competitive Strategies’, Houston, M. J. (eds), Review of Marketing, Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association, pp. 39–66.Google Scholar
EIA (2003), ‘The Global LNG Market – Status and Outlook’, DOE/EIA-0637, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Gosh, M. and John, G. (1999), ‘Governance Value Analysis and Marketing Strategy’, Journal of Marketing, 63 (4): 131–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, S. J. and Hart, O. D. (1986), ‘The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration’, Journal of Political Economy, 94 (4): 691–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henzisz, W. J. (2000), ‘The Institutional Environment for Economic Growth’, Economics and Politics, 12 (1): 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschhausen, C. v. and Neumann, A. (2006), ‘Long-term Contracts and Asset Specificity Revisited – An Empirical Analysis of Producer−Importer Relations in the Natural Gas Industry’, MIT-CEEPR Discussion Paper 06-010.Google Scholar
Iniss, H. (2004), ‘Operational Vertical Integration in the Gas Industry, with Emphasis on LNG: Is It Necessary to Ensure Viability?’, Centre for Energy, Petroleum and Mineral Law, University of Dundee.Google Scholar
Jensen, J. T. (2003), ‘The LNG Revolution’, Energy Journal, 24 (2): 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, J. T. (2004), ‘The Development of a Global LNG Market. Is It Likely? If So, When?’, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Joskow, P. L. (2005), ‘Vertical Integration’, Handbook of New Institutional Economics, Springer/Springer.Google Scholar
Klein, B. (1988), ‘Vertical Integration as Organizational Ownership: The Fisher Body-General Motors Relationship Revisited’, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 4 (1): 199–213.Google Scholar
Klein, B., Crawford, R. G., and Alchian, A. A. (1978), ‘Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process’, Journal of Law and Economics, 21 (4): 297–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlois, R. N. (1992), ‘Transaction Cost Economics in Real Time’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 1 (1): 99–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddala, G. S. (1993), Limited-dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Masten, S. (1995), ‘Empirical research in transaction cost economics: challenges, progress, directions’, in Groenewegen, J. (ed.), Transaction Cost Economics and Beyond, Amsterdam: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Monteverde, K. and Teece, D. J. (1982), ‘Appropriable Rents and Quasi-Vertical Integration’, Journal of Law and Economics, 25 (2): 321–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickerson, J. A. (1997), ‘Towards an Economizing Theory of Strategy’, Olin Working Paper 97-107.Google Scholar
Nickerson, J. A., Hamilton, B. H., and Wada, T. (2001), ‘Market Position, Resource Profile, and Governance: Linking Porter and Williamson in the Context of International Courier and Small Package Services in Japan’, Strategic Management Journal, 22 (3): 251–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nissen, D. (2004), ‘Commercial LNG – Structure and Implications’, Presentation at 14th Repsol YPF Seminar Managing Energy Markets, La Coruna, 26 May.Google Scholar
Nissen, D. (2006), ‘The Evolution of Commercial LNG: Optionality, Security, and Coasian Efficiency’, Presentation at 29th IAEE International Conference, Potsdam, 7–10 June.Google Scholar
Nissen, D. (2007), ‘The Commercialization of Asia-Pacific LNG’, Presentation at 30th IAEE International Conference, Wellington, 18–21 February.Google Scholar
Poppo, L. and Zenger, T. (1998), ‘Testing Alternative Theories of the Firm: Transaction Cost, Knowledge Based, and Measurement Explanations for Make-or-Buy Decisions in Information Services’, Strategic Management Journal, 19 (2): 853–877.3.0.CO;2-B>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, M. E. (1996), ‘What is Strategy?’, Harvard Business Review, November/December, pp. 61–78.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1971), ‘The Vertical Integration of Production: Market Failure Considerations’, American Economic Review, 61 (2): 112–123.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1983), ‘Credible Commitments: Using Hostages to Support Exchanges’, American Economic Review, 73 (4): 519–540.Google Scholar